Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effectiveness of Publicity versus Advertising: A Meta-Analysis

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2)

Abstract

Many organizations have placed increasingly importance on marketing-oriented publicity compared to advertising (Ries and Ries 2002; Shimp 2007). The main distinction between advertising and publicity is found in their definitions. Advertising is paid communication that identifies the message sponsor. Publicity secures editorial space in media (i.e., space that is not paid for) for promotion purposes (Kotler and Keller 2006) and does not identify a sponsor. Despite the widespread belief among practitioners that publicity outperforms advertising (e.g., Hausman 2003; Pohl 2008), previous study results are far from consistent: some studies find no differences between the impact of publicity and advertising (e.g., Hallahan 1999a; Hallahan 1999b; Jo 2004; Schmidt and Hitchon 1999), and some studies show that advertising outperforms publicity (e.g., Jacoby and Hoyer 1989; Salmon et al. 1985). The present study shows whether and under what conditions marketing-oriented publicity outperforms advertising in terms of communication effectiveness. For this purpose, we conduct an integrative meta-analysis of research on the effects of marketing-oriented publicity versus advertising that provides generalized results. We explain inconsistent results of previous studies by examining the effects of relevant moderator variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahluwalia, R.; Burnkrant, R. E. & Unnava, H. R. (2000), “Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37 (May), 203-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basuroy, S.; Chatterjee, S. & Ravid, S. A. (2003), “How Critical Are Critical Reviews? The Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 (October), 103-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, W. H.; Johnson, J. L.; Rich, G. A.; Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995), “On the Interchangeability of Objective and Subjective Measures of Employee Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48 (3), 587-605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, G. T. (1994), “Does Publicity Outperform Advertising? An Experimental Test of the Third-Party Endorsement,” in: Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 6 (3), 185-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celebi, S. I. (2007), “The Credibility of Advertising Versus Publicity for New FMCGs in Turkey,” in: Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 12 (2), 161-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. & Maheswaran, D. (1994), “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: The Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgements,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66 (3), 460-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, C.; Slater, M. D. & Kelly, K. A. (1995), “Advertising Versus Product Publicity: The Effects on Credibility and Purchase Intent,” Paper presented to Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, August 1995, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988), “Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,” Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous, A. & Hébert, C. (1991), “Une Étude Comparative Des Effets De La Publicité Écrite Conventionelle Et Du Public-Reportage,” in: Schellinick, T. (1991) (eds.): Marketing: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Niagara Fall, Ontario, 102-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R.; Daily, C. M.; Certo, S. T. & Roengpitya, R. (2003), “Meta-Analyses of Financial Performance and Equity: Fusion or Confusion?,” in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 (1), 13-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2009), “A Meta-analysis of Humor in Advertising,” in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 37 (2), 191-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruder, C. L.; Cook, T. D.; Hennigan, K. M.; Flay, B. R.; Alessis, C. & Halamaj, J. (1978), “Empirical Test of the Absolute Sleeper Effect Predicted From the Discounting Cue Hypothesis,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 36 (10), 1061-1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. (1999a), “Content Class as a Contextual Cue in the Cognitive Process of Publicity Versus Advertising,” in: Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 11 (4), 293-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. (2008), “Need for Cognition as Motivation to Process Publicity and Advertising,” in: Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 14 (3), 169-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. E. (1995), “Product Publicity Versus Advertising: An Investigation of Third-Party Endorsement Effects, the Role of Content Class as a Contextual Processing Cue,” Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. E. (1999b), “No, Virginia, It’s Not True What They Say About Publicity’s ’Implied Third-Party Endorsement’ Effect,” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 25 (3), 331-350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. & Mills, J. (1999), “Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology,” American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, D.; Wilkinson, J. B. & Prough, G. E. (1991), “Advertorials: Effective? Deceptive? Or Tempest in a Teapot?,” in: Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol. 2 (4), 41-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, D. M.; Wilkinson, J. B. & Prough, G. E. (1989), “Advertorials: Do Consumers See the Wolf in the Sheep’s Clothing?,” in: Bloom, P. (1989) (eds.): 1989 AMA Educators’ Proceedings: Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, Ill, 308-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, M. (2003), “PR vs. Ads: Are You Getting What You Pay For?,” in: Brandweek, Vol. 44 (5), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, J. E. & Anderson, S. C. (1990), “The Interaction of Peripheral Cues and Message Arguments on Cognitive Responses to an Advertisement,” in: Goldberg, M.; Gorn, G. and Pollay, R. (1990) (eds.): Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, 237-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning-Thurau, T.; Houston, M. B. & Walsh, G. (2006), “The Differing Roles of Success Drivers Across Sequential Channels: An Application to the Motion Picture Industry,” in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34 (4), 559-575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (2004), “Methods of Meta-Analysis. Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings,” Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. & Hoyer, W. D. (1989), “The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 (March), 434-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H. S. (2003), “Compounding Consumer Interest. Effects of Advertising Campaign Publicity on the Ability to Recall Subsequent Advertisements,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 32 (4), 29-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H. S.; Suh, J. and Donovan, D. T. (2008), “Salient Effects of Publicity on Advertised Brand Recall and Recognition: The List-Strength Paradigm,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 37 (1), 45-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H. S.; Zhao, X. & An, S. (2006), “Examining Effects of Advertising Campaign Publicity in a Field Study,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 46 (June), 171-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, S. (2004), “Effect of Content Type on Impact: Editorial Vs. Advertising,” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 30, 503-512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, E.; Schulz-Hardt, S. & Frey, D. (2005), “Giving Advice or Making Decisions in Someone Else’s Place: The Influence of Impression, Defense, and Accuracy Motivation on the Search for New Information,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31 (7), 977-990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B.-H.; Pasadeos, Y. & Barban, A. (2001), “On the Deceptive Effectiveness of Labeled and Unlabeled Advertorial Formats,” in: Mass Communication & Society, Vol. 4 (3), 265-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2006), “Marketing Management,” Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumkale, G. T. & Albarracin, D. (2004), “The Sleeper Effect in Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review,” in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 130 (1), 143-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küster-Rohde, F. (2009), “Immediate and Delayed Effects of Credibility on Different Types of Advertising Messages,” Dissertation, Free University Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. T. (2001), “Practical Meta-Analysis,” Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loda, M. D. & Coleman, B. C. (2005), “Sequence Matters: A More Effective Way to Use Advertising and Publicity,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 45 (December), 362-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loda, M. D.; Norman, W. & Backman, K. (2005), “How Potential Tourists React to Mass Media Marketing: Advertising Versus Publicity,” in: Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 18 (3), 63-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loda, M. D.; Norman, W. & Backman, K. F. (2007), “Advertising and Publicity: Suggested New Applications for Tourism Marketers,” in: Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 45 (February), 259-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, K. R. & Putrevu, S. (1993), “Advertising and Publicity: An Information Processing Perspective,” in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 14, 57-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, K. R. & Putrevu, S. (1998), “Communicating in Print: A Comparison of Consumer Responses to Different Promotional Formats,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 20 (2), 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micu, A. C. (2005), “Testing for a Synergistic Effect Between Online Publicity and Advertising in an Integrated Marketing Communications Context,” Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, G. M. (2008), “Public Relations Adding to Businesses’ Bottom Line,” in: Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 14 (3/4), 195-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, I. L. & Scharbach, S. E. (1971), “Advertising: More Than Meets the Eye?,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 11 (3), 19-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putrevu, S. (2005), “Differences in Readers’ Response Towards Advertising Versus Publicity,” in: Psychological Reports, Vol. 96, 207-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. (1994), “Random Effects Models,” in: Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. V. (1994) (eds.): The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Sage, New York, 301-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, A. & Ries, L. (2002), “The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR,” HarperBusiness, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinallo, D. & Basuroy, S. (2009), “Does Advertising Spending Influence Media Coverage of the Advertiser?,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73 (November), 33-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, S. (2008), “Publicity vs. Advertising in a Cluttered Environment: Effects on Advertising and Brand Identificiation,” in: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 30 (Fall), 27-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. T.; Reid, L. N.; Pokrywczynski, J. & Willett, R. W. (1985), “The Effectiveness of Advocacy Advertising Relative to News Coverage,” in: Communication Research, Vol. 12 (4), 546-567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. & Graham, J. W. (2002), “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art,” in: Psychological Methods, Vol. 7 (2), 147-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. L. & Hitchon, J. C. (1999), “When Advertising and Public Relations Converge: An Application of Schema Theory to the Persuasive Impact of Alignment Ads,” in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 76 (3), 433-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N.; Kumpf, M. & Bussmann, W. (1986), “Resistance to Persuasion as a Consequence of Influence Attempts in Advertising and Non-Advertising Communications,” in: Psychology. A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, Vol. 23 (2/3), 72-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R. & Haddock, C. K. (1994), “Combining Estimates of Effect Sizes,” in: Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. V. (1994) (eds.): The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 261-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T. A. (2007), “Integrated Marketing Communications in Advertising and Promotion,” Mason, OH, Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stammerjohan, C.; Wood, C. M.; Chang, Y. and Thorson, E. (2005), “An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between Publicity, Advertising, and Previous Brand Attitudes and Knowledge,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 34 (4), 55-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, D.; Bleske, G. L. & Zhao, X. (1996), “Modeling Format and Source Effects of an Advocacy Message,” in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 73 (1), 135-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2006), “When Synergy in Marketing Communication Online Enhances Audience Response: The Effects of Varying Advertising and Product Publicity Messages,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 46 (June), 160-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. (2007), “When Web Pages Influence Web Usability: Effects of Online Strategic Communication,” in: Journal of Strategic Communication, Vol. 1 (2), 93-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. S.-L. & Nelson, R. A. (2006), “The Effects of Identical Versus Varied Advertising and Publicity Messages on Consumer Responses,” in: Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 12 (2), 109-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-L.A. (2003), “Customer Testimonials and News Clips as Contextual Cues in the Consumer Cognitive Processing of Online Shopping: How Do They Build Trust and Then Increase Purchase Intention?,” in: Journal of Promotion Management, Vol. 9 (1/2), 145-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, M. (1961), “Does the “Sleeper Effect” Apply to Advertising?,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25 (6), 65-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. B.; Hausknecht, D. & Prough, G. E. (1995), “Reader Categorization of a Controversial Communication: Advertisement Versus Editorial,” in: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 14 (2), 245-254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Germany

    Martin Eisend

  2. Free University Berlin, Germany

    Franziska Küster

Authors
  1. Martin Eisend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska Küster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Shintaro Okazaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eisend, M., Küster, F. (2011). The Effectiveness of Publicity versus Advertising: A Meta-Analysis. In: Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2). Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6854-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation