Determinants of the Impact of Crises on Organizational Reputation: An Experimental Test of Crisis Communication Strategies and the Moderating Impact of Locus of Control

  • An-Sofie Claeys
  • Verolien Cauberghe
  • Patrick Vyncke


Academic interest in the field of crisis communication has significantly increased over the years (Ulmer et al., 2007). Corporations are becoming more and more aware that crises can and will happen to organizations just like themselves (Benson, 1988). No company can escape all crises during its life cycle, and it is during these crisis situations that the battle to protect credibility in the eyes of stakeholders is most fierce (Hobbs, 1995). It takes many years to build a favorable organizational reputation but only one single crisis to ruin it (Dean, 2004). Since a good reputation is a central goal of every organization, there is a need to study the use of crisis response communication strategies in order to defend reputations during crises (Benoit, 1995; Coombs and Holladay, 2002).


Personality Trait Response Strategy Corporate Reputation Attribution Theory Crisis Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahluwalia, R.; Burnkrant, R. E. & Unnava, H.R. (2000), “Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37 (2), 203-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benoit, W. L. (1995), “Accounts, Excuses, & Apologies : A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies,“ State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  3. Benoit, W. L. (1997), “Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication,” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 23 (2), 177-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, J. A. (1988), “Crisis Revisited: An Analysis of Strategies Used by Tylenol in the Second Tampering Episode, ” in: Central States Speech Journal, Vol. 39 (1), 49-66.Google Scholar
  5. Beretvas, S. N., Suizzo, M., Durham, J. A. & Yarnell, L.M. (2008), “A Reliability Generalization Study of Scores on Rotter’s and Nowicki-Strickland’s Locus of Control Scales,” in: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 68 (1), 97-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, B. E. (1974), “Four Components of the Rotter Internal-External Scale: Belief in a Difficult World, a Just World, a Predictable World, and a Politically Responsive World,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 29 (3), 381-391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S.J. (1996), “Communication and Attributions in a Crisis: An Experimental Study in Crisis Communication,” in: Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 8 (4), 279-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coombs, W. T. (1998), “An analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses from a Better Understanding of the Situation,” in: Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 10 (3), 177-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S.J. (2002), “Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets: Initial Tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory,” in: Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 16 (2), 165-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coombs, W. T. (2004), “West Pharmaceutical’s Explosion: Structuring Crisis Discourse Knowledge, ” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 30 (4), 467-473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coombs, W.T. (2007), “Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory,” in: Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10 (3), 163-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombs, W.T. & Holladay, S. J. (2008), “Comparing Apology to Equivalent Crisis Response Strategies: Clarifying Apology’s Role and Value in Crisis Communication,” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 34 (3), 252-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dean, D.H. (2004), “Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity: Effects of Corporate Reputation, Response, and Responsibility for a Crisis Event, ” in: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 41 (2), 192-211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, P.J., Downey, R.G. & Shiflett, S. (1977), “Locus of Control: Dimensionality and Predictability Using Likert Scales,” in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 62 (2), 214-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutta, M. J. & Vanacker, B. (2000), “Effects of Personality on Persuasive Appeals in Health Communication,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 27 (1), 119-125.Google Scholar
  16. Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A. & Sever, J.M. (2000), “The Reputation Quotient sm: A Multi-Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation,” in: The Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 7 (4), 241-255.Google Scholar
  17. Griffin, M.; Babin, B. J. & Darden, W.R. (1992), “Consumer Assessments of Responsibility for Product-Related Injuries: The Impact of Regulations, Warnings, and Promotional Policies,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19 (1), 870-878.Google Scholar
  18. Hobbs, J. D. (1995), “Treachery by any Other Name: A Case Study of the Toshiba Public Relations Crisis,” in: Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 8 (3), 323-346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, Y. (2006), “Crisis Situations, Communication Strategies, and Media Coverage: A Multicase Study Revisiting the Communicative Response Model,” in: Communication Research, Vol. 33 (3), 180-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelley, H.H. (1973), “The Processes of Causal Attribution,“ in: American psychologist, Vol. 28 (2), 107-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lefcourt, H.M. (1966), “Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement: A Review,” in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 65 (4), 206-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rotter, J.B. (1966), “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement,” in: Psychological Monographs, Vol. 80 (1), 1-27.Google Scholar
  23. Ulmer, R.R.; Seeger, M.W. & Sellnow, T.L. (2007), “Post-Crisis Communication and Renewal: Expanding the Parameters of Post-Crisis Discourse,” in: Public Relations Review, Vol. 33 (2), 130-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiner, B. (2000), “Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behaviour,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27 (3), 382-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • An-Sofie Claeys
    • 1
  • Verolien Cauberghe
    • 1
  • Patrick Vyncke
    • 1
  1. 1.Ghent UniversityBelgium

Personalised recommendations