Theoretical Foundations of Modularization: A Strategic Management Perspective

  • Wolfgang Burr


The principle of modularization has been widely implemented in industrial production over the last 100 years (Sanchez/Mahoney, 1996, 67). Even complex services are increasingly being offered in modular conception. The focus of this article is the question of the specific advantages and disadvantages of modularly designed services. The analysis will be carried out using an economic approach from the field of management studies, namely the resource based view of the firm.


Dynamic Capability Service Architecture Service Module Service Production System Product Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldwin, C.Y.; Clark, K.B. (1997a): Managing in an age of modularity. In: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75 (1997) 5, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, C.Y.; Clark, K.B. (1997b): Sun Wars: Competition within a modular cluster. In: Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. Ed.: Yoffie, D.B. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA 1997, pp. 123–155.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, C.Y.; Clark, K.B. (1998): Modularisierung: Ein Konzept wird universell. In: Harvard Business Manager, Vol. 20 (1998) 2, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
  4. Barney, J.B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In: Journal of Management, Vol. 17 (1991), pp. 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böhmann, T.; Junginger, M.; Krcmar, H. (2003): Modular Service Architectures: A Concept and Method for Engineering IT Services. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), Big Island, Hawaii 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Böhmann, T.; Krcmar, H. (2006): Modulare Servicearchitekturen. In: Service Engineering: Entwicklung und Gestaltung innovativer Dienstleistungen. Eds.: Bullinger, H.-J.; Scheer, A.-W. Springer, Heidelberg 2006, pp. 377–401.Google Scholar
  7. Brumagim, A.L. (1994): A hierarchy of corporate resources. In: Advances in Strategic Management (Vol. 10A). Eds.: Shrivastava, P.; Huff, A.S.; Dutton, J.E. JAI Press, Greenwich, UK 1994, pp. 81–112.Google Scholar
  8. Burr, W. (2002): Service Engineering bei technischen Dienstleistungen: Eine ökonomische Analyse der Modularisierung, Leistungstiefengestaltung und Systembündelung (Vol. 286), DUV, Wiesbaden 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Burr, W. (2003): Markt- und Unternehmensstrukturen bei technischen Dienstleistungen. DUV, Wiesbaden 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Foss, N. (1996): Whither the competence perspective? In: Towards a competence theory of the firm. Eds.: Foss, N.; Knudsen, C. Routledge Chapman & Hall, London, UK 1996, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar
  11. Grant, R. (1991): The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. In: California Management Review, Vol. 33 (1991) 3, pp. 114–135.Google Scholar
  12. Henderson, R.; Clark, K.B. (1990): Architectural Innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 (1990) 1, pp. 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knudsen, C. (1995): Theories of the firm, strategic management and leadership. In: Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. Ed.: Montgomery, C.A. Springer, Berlin 1995, pp. 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Langlois, R.N. (1997): Cogition and Capabilities: Opportunities seized and missed in the history of the computer indstry. In: Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights. Eds.: Garud, R.; Nayyar, P.R.; Baruch, Z.S. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Lippman, S.A.; Rumelt, R.P. (1982): Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. In: Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13 (1982) 2, pp. 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery, C.A. (1995): Of diamonds and rust: A new look at resources. In: Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Toward a synthesis. Ed.: Montgomery, C.A. Springer, Berlin 1995, pp. 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfaffmann, E. (2000): Knowledge-maturity of products, modularity, and the vertical boundaries of the firm. In: Governance, competence, and entrepreneurship. Eds.: Foss, N.J.; Mahnke, V. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 2000, pp. 250–275.Google Scholar
  18. Picot, A.; Reichwald, R.; Wigand, R. (1998): Die grenzenlose Unternehmung. Gabler, Wiesbaden 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Post, H. (1997): Modularity in product design, development, and organisation: A case study of Baan company. In: Strategic learning and knowledge management. Eds.: Sanchez, R.; Heene, A. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1997, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar
  20. Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. (1990): Strategic flexibility in product competition. In: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 (1990) 3, pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
  21. Sanchez, R. (1995): Strategic flexibility in product competition. In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 (1995) Summer, pp. 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanchez, R. (1996): Strategic product creation: Managing new interactions of technology, markets, and organizations. In: European Management Journal, Vol. 14 (1996) 2, pp. 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanchez, R.; Heene, A.; Thomas, H. (Hrsg.) (1996): Dynamics of competence-based competition, Pergamon, Oxford 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Sanchez, R.; Mahoney, J.T. (1996): Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 (1996) Winter, pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  25. Spieß, J. (2002): Interorganisationales Wissensmanagement in Systemlieferantenbeziehungen. Dissertation, Universität der Bundeswehr 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Staehle, W.H. (1991): Redundanz, Slack und lose Kopplung in Organisationen: Eine Verschwendung von Ressourcen? In: Managementforschung. Eds.: Staehle, W.H.; Sydow, J. de Gruyter, Berlin 1991, pp. 313–345.Google Scholar
  27. Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 (1997) 7, pp. 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ulrich, K.T. (1995): The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. In: Research Policy, Vol. 24 (1995) 3, pp. 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weik, K.E. (1976): Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21 (1976) 1, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weik, K.E. (1979): The social psychology of organizing. Longman Higher Education, Reading, MA, USA 1979.Google Scholar
  31. Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm. In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 (1984) 2, pp. 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wernerfelt, B. (1989): From critical resources to corporate strategy. In: Journal of General Management, Vol. 14 (1989) 3, pp. 4–12.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, J.R. (1992): How sustainable is your competitive advantage? In: California Management Review, Vol. 34 (1992) 3, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Burr
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Research & Development and Innovation ManagementUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations