Skip to main content

Laborexperimente in der Regionalökonomik?! Ein erster Überblick

  • Chapter
  • 1415 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Viele der Phänomene, die Gegenstand der Regionalökonomik sind, entstehen durch die langfristige Interaktion sehr vieler Akteure; sie sind damit einer experimentellen Rekonstruktion kaum zugänglich. Dennoch gibt es einen (noch) kleinen Strauß regionalökonomischer Theorien oder Theoriebausteine, die bereits experimentell getestet wurden. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen ersten Überblick über dieses gerade entstehende Forschungsfeld. In Kapitel 2 und 3 geht es um regionalökonomisch relevante strategische Interaktionen einer kleinen Zahl von Akteuren wie im Hotelling-Modell. Kapitel 4 diskutiert die experimentelle Evidenz zu face-to-face-Interaktionen, die ein wichtiges Element jüngerer Erklärungen von Agglomerationsvorteilen sind. Das Papier schließt mit einem Ausblick auf künftige Einsatzmöglichkeiten der experimentellen Methode in der Regionalökonomik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Anderson, Lisa R., Beth A. Freeborn, Jessica Holmes, Mark Jeffreys, Dan Lass und Jack Soper (2010), Location, Location, Location! A Classroom Demonstration of the Hotelling Model, erscheint in: Perspectives on Economic Education Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Jeffrey (2008), Der gefälschte König, Frankfurt am Main: Scherz

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlen, Jennifer H. und Eric L. Talley (Hrsg., 2008), Experimental Law and Economics, Cheltenham und Northampton (Mass.): Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, Vairam und William Dilla (1992), Computer-Mediated Communication and Structured Interaction in Transfer Pricing Negotiation, Journal of Information Systems 6, 149–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, Vairam und William N. Dilla (1995), Judgment Accuracy and Outcomes in Negotiation: A Causal Modeling Analysis of Decision-Aiding Effects, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61, 289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Melissa, Daniel Nettle und Gilbert Roberts (2006), Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting, Biology Letters 2, 412–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Joyce, John Dickhaut und Kevin McCabe (1995), Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History, Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Charles F. Jr., Karen Nelson Kahler und Lucia M. Paolicelli (1985), The Miscommunication of Deception: An Adaptive Perspective, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21, 331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Nathan, Darren Gergle, Judith S. Olson und Gary M. Olson (2001), Being there versus seeing there: Trust via video, Proceedings of CHI 2001, extended abstracts, New York: ACM Press, 291–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, Jeannette, Axel Ockenfels und Joachim Weimann (2003), The effect of communication media on cooperation, German Economic Review 4, 217–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, Jeannette (2006), Communication Channels and Induced Behavior, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (Special Issue 05), 99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Kruse, Jamie, Mark B. Cronshaw und David J. Schenk (1993), Theory and Experiments on Spatial Competition, Economic Inquiry 31, 139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Kruse, Jamie und David J. Schenk (2000), Location, cooperation and communication: An experimental examination, International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Terence C. und Brian Hare (2007), Engineering Human Cooperation. Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Contributions?, Human Nature 18, 88–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadigan, John, Pamela Schmitt, Robert Shupp und Kurtis Swope (2009), The Holdout Problem and Urban Sprawl: Experimental Evidence, mimeo (United States Naval Academy Department of Economics Working Paper 2009–24)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, Frances (2001), The Death of Distance 2.0, London: Texere

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletta, Jean, Rachel McEwan und Anne Anderson (1998), Communication in virtual supply chain teams, in: Gianni Jacucci, Gustav J. Olling, Kenneth Preiss und Michael Wozny (Hrsg.), Globalization of manufacturing in the digital communications era of the 21st century: Innovation, agility, and the virtual enterprise, Boston, 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney, Thomas, Swee-Hoon Chuah und Robert Hoffmann (2009), Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72, 618–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Richard und Sherstyuk, Katerina (2000), Spatial Competition with Three Firms: An Experimental Study, Economic Inquiry 38, 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Vincent P. and Joel Sobel (1982), Strategic Information Transmission, Econometrica 50, 1431–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Douglas D. und Charles A. Holt (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Douglas D. und Charles A. Holt (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, Robyn M., Jeanne McTavish, und Harriet Shaklee (1977), Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eber, Nicolas (2002), Hotelling in the Classroom, Classroom Expernomics 11, 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckey, Hans-Friedrich (2008), Regionalökonomie, Wiesbaden: Gabler

    Google Scholar 

  • Eich, Günter (1991), Gesammelte Werke Band III (Hörspiele 2), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Etscheit, Georg (2010), Die Spiele kippen! Bauern in Garmisch-Partenkirchen wollen das olympische Wintersportspektakel nicht haben, in: ZEIT 30/2010 vom 22. Juli, S.14

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Björn (2009), Clean Evidence on Face-to-Face: Why Experimental Economics is of Interest to Regional Economists, mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert H., Thomas Gilovich und Dennis T. Regan (1993), The Evolution of One-Shot Cooperation: An Experiment, Ethology and Sociobiology 14, 247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. und Iris Bohnet (1995), Institutions Affect Fairness: Experimental Investigations, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151, 286–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, Norman und Joe Oppenheimer (1998), Some consequences of e-mail vs. faceto-face communication in experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35, 389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, Kevin J. und Daniel M.T. Fessler (2005), Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game, Evolution and Human Behavior 26, 245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Glenn und John A. List (2004), Field Experiments, Journal of Economic Literature 42, 1013–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, Ralph und Andreas Ortmann (2001), Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 383–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, Harold (1929), Stability in Competition, Economic Journal 39, 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, Steffen, Wieland Müller und Nicolaas J. Vriend (2002), The East End, the West End, and King's Cross: on Clustering in the Four-Player Hotelling Game, Economic Inquiry 40, 231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, Dorothea (2010), Experimental Practices in Economics: Performativity and the Creation of Phenomena, Discussion Paper SP II 2010 – 01, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, Edward und Michael Storper (2001), The Economic Geography of the Internet Age, Journal of International Business Studies 32, 641–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Steven D. und Stephen J. Dubner (2009), SuperFreakonomics, London: Lane

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred (1890), The Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London, online edition at www.socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/marshall/prin/index.html

  • Naquin, Charles E., Terri R. Kurtzberg und Liuba Y. Belkin (2008), E-Mail Communication and Group Cooperation in Mixed Motive Contexts, erscheint in: Social Justice Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockenfels, Axel und Reinhard Selten (2000), An Experiment on the Hypothesis of Involuntary Truth-Signalling in Bargaining, Games and Economic Behavior 33, 90–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, Mary, Keiko Ishii, Motoki Watabe und Shinobu Kitayama (2009), Minimal Social Cues in the Dictator Game, Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 358–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, Elena (1998), Trust Breaks Down in Electronic Contexts but Can Be Repaired by Some Initial Face-to-Face Contact, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems 1998, 496–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharlemann, Jörn P.W., Catherine C. Eckel, Alex Kacelnik und Rick K. Wilson (2001), The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face, Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 617–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. (1971), Dynamic Models of Segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 143–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York und London

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, Michael und Anthony J. Venables (2004), Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy, Journal of Economic Geography 4, 351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Valley, Kathleen, Leigh Thompson, Robert Gibbons und Max H. Bazerman (2002), How Communication Improves Efficiency in Bargaining Games, Games and Economic Behavior 38, 127–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, Aldert (2008), Detecting Lies and Deceit. Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd ed., Chichester: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Joseph Tao-yi, Michael Spezio und Colin F. Camerer (2010), Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth Telling and Deception in Sender-Receiver-Games, American Economic Review 100, 984–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frank, B. (2011). Laborexperimente in der Regionalökonomik?! Ein erster Überblick. In: Dreger, C., Kosfeld, R., Türck, M. (eds) Empirische Regionalforschung heute. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6366-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics