BITs and Institutional Quality

  • Jan Peter Sasse


Bilateral Investment Treaties are designed to increase investment flows to the signatory states. Section 4.2.1, reviewing the empirical evidence regarding BITs, revealed that some studies have found robust evidence that BITs indeed have a positive impact on investment flows. In addition, BITs might not only fulfil their stated purpose of attracting FDI but may also have external effects on domestic institutional quality. These external effects have been suggested to be either of a positive or negative nature. As the importance of institutional quality on economic growth has been emphasised by a number of authors, the question of an interaction between BITs and domestic institutional quality is of high relevance. This chapter addresses the question of the interplay between BITs and institutional quality using panel data in a fixed effects model. Specifically, we run regressions using the World Governance Indicators as the dependent variable over the time period 1996 to 2007 for non-OECD countries. The number of BITs and changes in domestic regulation in the field of investment are utilised as independent variables. The analysis further controls for GDP per capita, FDI inflows, trade openness, development aid and membership of the ICSID convention.


Trade Openness Institutional Quality Domestic Institution Bilateral Investment Treaty Domestic Regulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Peter Sasse

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations