Skip to main content

Brand Placements in Movies: The Impact of Modality, Prominence and Plot Connection on Attitude and Behavioral Intention

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 1)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of three essential brand placement characteristics on brand attitudes towards and purchase intentions of brands placed in movies. Previous studies examining the effectiveness of brand placement have yielded mixed results. The mixed findings indicate that not all brand placements are equally effective. This may be due to a differentiating impact of varying types of brand placements. Modality, prominence and plot connection are key constructs of brand placement that have been repeatedly shown to influence brand placement effectiveness. In the past, a majority of empirical studies measured the effectiveness of brand placements in terms of how well they are remembered (Babin and Carder 1996; Gupta and Lord 1998; Johnstone and Dodd 2000; Nelson 2002; Roehm, Roehm and Boone 2004; Vollmers and Mizerski 1994). However, since research has shown that recall may be a poor predictor of persuasion (Mackie and Asuncion 1990), research on the effectiveness of brand placements should rather focus on attitude and behavior effects. This study investigates differences in respondents’ attitudes (affective) and purchase intention (conative) towards the placed brands, according to the placements’ varying levels of modality, prominence and plot connection. To explain these effects, we draw from Paivio’s dual-coding theory (1986), the Persuasion Knowledge Model (Friestad and Wright 1994) and Russell’s (in)congruency principle (2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Babin, L.A. and A.C. Burns (1997), “Effects of Print Ad Pictures and Copy Containing Instructions to Imagine on Mental Imagery that Mediates Attitudes,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26 (3), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, L.A. and S.T. Carder (1996), “Viewers’ Recognition of Brands Placed Within a Film,” in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 15 (2), 140–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S.K.; Karrh, J.A. and H. Patwardhan (2006), “Audience Responses to Product Placements,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 35 (3), 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971), “Psychological Modelling: Conflicting Theories,” Aldine Atherton, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, N.; Aksoy L. and S.A. Malkoc (2004), “Embedding Brands Within Media Content: The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficiency,” in: Shrum, L.J. (2004) (ed.): The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines between Entertainment and Media, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bone, P. F. and P. S. Ellen (1992), "The Generation and Consequences of Communication-Evoked Imagery," in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19 (1), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, I.; Dubas, K.M. and L. A. Babin (1999), "The Influence of Product-Placement Type & Exposure Time on Product-Placement Recognition," in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 18 (3), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M.C.; Keller, K.L.; Mick, D.G. and W.D. Hoyer (2003), “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30 (2), 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d'Astous, A. and F. Chartier (2000), "A Study of Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations and Memory of Product Placements in Movies," in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol: 22 (2), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Astous, A. and N. Séguin (1999), "Consumer Reactions to Product Placement Strategies in Television Sponsorship," in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 (9/10), 896–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J.; Romer D. and J. McQueen (1989), "Using Drama to Persuade," in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 (3), 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, R. and R.J. Avery (2000), “Brand Appearances on Prime-Time Television,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 22 (2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M. and P. Wright (1994), "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21 (1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. B. and S. J. Gould (2007), "Recall of Products Placed as Prizes Versus Commercials in Game Shows," in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 29 (1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P.B. and K.R. Lord (1998), “Product Placement in Movies: the Effect of Prominence and Mode on Audience Recall,” in: Journal of Current Issues in Advertising, Vol. 20 (1), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, E. and C. A. Dodd (2000), "Placements as Mediators of Brand Salience within a Uk Cinema," in: Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 6 (3), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrh, J.A. (1998), “Brand Placement: A Review,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 20 (2), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrh, J. A.; McKee, K. B. and C. J. Pardun (2003), "Practitioners' Evolving Views on Product Placement Effectiveness," in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 43 (2), 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Ferle, C. and S.M. Edwards (2006), “Product Placement: How Brands Appear on Television,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 35 (4), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H. and C. Mason (1999), “Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26 (2), 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M. and A. G. Asuncion (1990), "On-Line and Memory-Based Modification of Attitudes: Determinants of Message Recall-Attitude Change Correspondence," in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59 (1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, J.A. (2004), “Product Placement: The Nature of the Practice and Potential Avenues for Inquiry,” in: Shrum, L.J. (2004) (ed.): The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines between Entertainment and Media, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J. and A.M. Tybout (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R. (2002), "Recall of Brand Placements in Computer/Video Games," in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 42 (2), 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986), “Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach,” Oxford University Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, W. D. and L. E. Leigh (1989), "Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments," in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26 (2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puto, C. P. and W.D. Wells (1984), “Informational and Transformational Advertising: The Differential Effects of Time,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11 (1), 638–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehm, M. L.; Roehm H.A. and D. S. Boone (2004), "Plugs Versus Placements: A Comparison of Alternatives for within-Program Brand Exposure," in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 21 (1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C.A. (1998), “Toward a Framework of Product Placement: Theoretical Propositions,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25 (1), 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C.A. (2002), “Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29 (3), 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, K. B. and A. Guo (2005), "‘Leaving on a (Branded) Jet Plane’: An Exploration of Audience Attitudes Towards Product Assimilations in Television Content," in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 27 (1), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmers, S. and R. Mizerski (1994), "A Review and Investigation into the Effectiveness of Product Placement in Films," in: 1994 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, ed. K.W. King, Athens, GA: American Academy of Advertising, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M.; Roskos-Ewoldsen B. and D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (2004), "Mental Models for Brand Placement," in: Shrum, L.J. (2004) (ed.): The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines between Entertainment and Media, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ralf Terlutter Sandra Diehl Shintaro Okazaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Purnawirawan, N., Wouters, M., Pelsmacker, P. (2010). Brand Placements in Movies: The Impact of Modality, Prominence and Plot Connection on Attitude and Behavioral Intention. In: Terlutter, R., Diehl, S., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 1). Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6006-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics