Advertisement

Reducing Choice Conflict for Complex Products through Categorization

  • Tobias Langner
  • Martin Krengel
Part of the European Advertising Academy book series (EAA)

Abstract

Today, consumers face a huge diversity of products and services. An ordinary American supermarket sells about 285 types of cookies, 120 types of pasta sauces, 175 types of salad dressings and an incredible amount of 275 types of cereal (Schwartz, 2005). Online stores like Amazon offer 10.000 different hand bags and 180.000 products for gardening (Hielscher, 2009). A typical electronic store like the European electronics store Media Markt offers a total of 100.000 stock keeping units (Berke et al., 2012). At Media Markt, customers can choose among 80 different mobile phones, 100 fridges, 32 dishwashers, 146 coffee machines,81 printers, 54 computer screens, 285 notebooks, and 271 digital cameras (Mediamarkt.de).

Keywords

Cell Phone Product Category Complex Product Category Label Choice Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alba, J. and W. Hutchinson (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berke, J.; Hielscher H. and C. Schlesig (2012), “Die Media-Markt-Masche,” in: Wirtschaftswoche, 8, 40–48.Google Scholar
  3. Bettman, J. R.; Luce, M. F. and J. W. Payne (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broniarczyk, S. M.; Hoyer, W. D. and L. McAlister (1998), “Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chernev, A. (2003a), “Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chernev, A. (2003b), “When More is Less and Less is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan, N. (2001), “The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity,” in: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhar, R. (1997), “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans M., Moutinho L. and W. F. van Raaij (1997), “Applied Consumer Behaviour,” London: Addi- son-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Gourville, J. T. and S. Soman (2005), “Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires,” in: Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herpen, E. and R. Pieters (2002), “The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute- Based Approach,” in: Marketing Science, 21(3), 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hielscher, H. (2009), “Bison und Bucher: Der Online-Handler Amazon wird mit Erfolg zu dem, was Quelle eins war,” in: Wirtschaftswoche, 44, 79.Google Scholar
  13. Hoch, S. J.; Bradlow, E. T. and B. Wansink (1999), “The Variety of an Assortment,” in: Marketing Science, 18(4), 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iyengar, S. S. and M. R. Lepper (2000), “When Choice is Demotivating: Can one Desire too Much of a Good Thing?,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iyengar, S. S.; Jiang, W. and G. Huberman (2004), “How Much Choice is too Much: Determinants of Individual Contributions in 401 K Retirement Plans,” in: Mitchell, O. S.; Utkus, S. (2004) (eds.): Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–97.Google Scholar
  16. Kahn, B. E. and B. Wansink (2004), “The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lurie, N. (2004), “Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: The Role of Information Structure,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mediamarkt.de (2012),http://www.mediamarkt.de, accessed 15 March 2012.
  19. Miller, G. A. (1956), “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information,” in: Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mogilner, C.; Rudnick T. and S. S. Iyengar (2008), “The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers’ Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne, J. W. (1976) “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,” in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Redelmeier, D. A. and E. Shafir (1995), “Medical Decision Making in Situations that Offer Multiple Alternatives,” in: Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4), 302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rossiter, J. and L. Percy (1998), “Advertising and Promotion Management,” Boston: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  24. Schwartz, B. (2000), “Self-Determination: The Tyranny of Freedom,” in: American Psychologist, 55(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwartz, B. (2005), “The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less,” Harper Perennial, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Shugan, S. (1980), “The Cost of Thinking,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tversky, A. and Shafir, E. (1992), “Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision,” in: Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vaughn, R. (1986), “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, 26(1), 57–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Langner
    • 1
  • Martin Krengel
    • 2
  1. 1.Bergische University WuppertalGermany
  2. 2.Bergische University WuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations