Skip to main content

Reducing Choice Conflict for Complex Products through Categorization

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III)

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

Abstract

Today, consumers face a huge diversity of products and services. An ordinary American supermarket sells about 285 types of cookies, 120 types of pasta sauces, 175 types of salad dressings and an incredible amount of 275 types of cereal (Schwartz, 2005). Online stores like Amazon offer 10.000 different hand bags and 180.000 products for gardening (Hielscher, 2009). A typical electronic store like the European electronics store Media Markt offers a total of 100.000 stock keeping units (Berke et al., 2012). At Media Markt, customers can choose among 80 different mobile phones, 100 fridges, 32 dishwashers, 146 coffee machines,81 printers, 54 computer screens, 285 notebooks, and 271 digital cameras (Mediamarkt.de).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alba, J. and W. Hutchinson (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke, J.; Hielscher H. and C. Schlesig (2012), “Die Media-Markt-Masche,” in: Wirtschaftswoche, 8, 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R.; Luce, M. F. and J. W. Payne (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, S. M.; Hoyer, W. D. and L. McAlister (1998), “Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev, A. (2003a), “Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev, A. (2003b), “When More is Less and Less is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2001), “The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity,” in: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. (1997), “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans M., Moutinho L. and W. F. van Raaij (1997), “Applied Consumer Behaviour,” London: Addi- son-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, J. T. and S. Soman (2005), “Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires,” in: Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herpen, E. and R. Pieters (2002), “The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute- Based Approach,” in: Marketing Science, 21(3), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hielscher, H. (2009), “Bison und Bucher: Der Online-Handler Amazon wird mit Erfolg zu dem, was Quelle eins war,” in: Wirtschaftswoche, 44, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, S. J.; Bradlow, E. T. and B. Wansink (1999), “The Variety of an Assortment,” in: Marketing Science, 18(4), 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S. and M. R. Lepper (2000), “When Choice is Demotivating: Can one Desire too Much of a Good Thing?,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S.; Jiang, W. and G. Huberman (2004), “How Much Choice is too Much: Determinants of Individual Contributions in 401 K Retirement Plans,” in: Mitchell, O. S.; Utkus, S. (2004) (eds.): Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B. E. and B. Wansink (2004), “The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, N. (2004), “Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: The Role of Information Structure,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediamarkt.de (2012),http://www.mediamarkt.de, accessed 15 March 2012.

  • Miller, G. A. (1956), “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information,” in: Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, C.; Rudnick T. and S. S. Iyengar (2008), “The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers’ Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1976) “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,” in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. A. and E. Shafir (1995), “Medical Decision Making in Situations that Offer Multiple Alternatives,” in: Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(4), 302–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. and L. Percy (1998), “Advertising and Promotion Management,” Boston: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2000), “Self-Determination: The Tyranny of Freedom,” in: American Psychologist, 55(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2005), “The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less,” Harper Perennial, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugan, S. (1980), “The Cost of Thinking,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Shafir, E. (1992), “Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision,” in: Psychological Science, 3(6), 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, R. (1986), “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, 26(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langner, T., Krengel, M. (2012). Reducing Choice Conflict for Complex Products through Categorization. In: Eisend, M., Langner, T., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III). European Advertising Academy. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4291-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics