Skip to main content

Why Organizations Systematically Engage in Employer Branding: A Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III)

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

Abstract

‘An organization has two important key factors: its brand and its employees. Both are not imitable and basically unique’. This quote by one of the interviewees in our study described in this paper (the CEO of a well-known international organization) clearly statesF the importance of organizational focus being on employees in order to succeed in a complex and fast moving environment. In recent years employer branding has significantly grown in relevance. Especially practitioners research on the topic of employer branding has received increasing attention (e.g., Andreassen and Lanseng, 2010; Edwards, 2010). Next to an expanding number of practitioners literature, different studies in the field of employer branding have been conducted, like for example the Q12 Workplace Survey (Gallup). The major task of the employer brand is to attract and retain superior employees (Berthon et al., 2005). With regard to the frequently cited ‘war for talent’ (e.g., Ewing et al., 2002; Lievens and Highhouse, 2003; Moroko and Uncles, 2008) a strong employer brand is seen essential to become an ‘employer of choice’ to attract prospective and retain existing employees (Martin et al., 2005). Especially inexperienced job seekers may rely upon the employer’s brand image as making a comparison based on job and company attributes can be difficult for them and furthermore they are not familiar with all workplace attributes (Agrawal and Swaroop, 2007). Indeed not only inexperienced job seekers have to manage with incomplete information. In fact, all employees have to accept a certain amount of missing information due to the fact that the complete assessment of an employer is not possible prior to employment with the organization (Moroko and Uncles, 2008). A strong employer brand can help to attract prospective and retain existing employees. However, even though the benefits and the importance of branding and brand building in the labor market have been discussed and acknowledged by many authors (e.g., Agrawal and Swaroop, 2007; Andreassen and Lanseng, 2010; Collins and Stevens, 2002), little is known regarding the factors that drive employer branding activities in organizations. Hence this paper focuses on the following research question to extend the research area of employer branding and to identify insights which have not yet been empirically examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Excerpts are followed by the employer branding level of the organization to which the interviewee belongs. Levels were identified based on interview data and secondary data. On the one hand the evaluation is based on the self-esteem of the interviewees. Additionally, high-level organizations show strong organizational anchoring of the employer brand with clearly demarcated responsibilities (e.g., employer brand managers). On the other hand the level of external communication of the employer brand (e.g., homepage, advertisements) was remarkably higher in high-level organizations. Low-level organizations in contrast, handle employer branding topics in terms of projects within the HR-Departments, don’t have clear responsibilities and do not communicate their employer brand externally.

References

  • Agrawal, R. K. and P. Swaroop (2007), “Effect of Employer Brand Image on Application Intentions of B-School Undergraduates,” in:The Journal of Business Perspective, 13(3), 41-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T. and S. Barrow (1996), “The Employer Brand,”, in:PAN`AGRA Working Papger. London: London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, T. W. and E. J. Lanseng (2010), “Service Differentiation: A Self-Image Congruency Perspective on Brand Building in the Labor Market,” in:Journal of Service Management, 21(2),212-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K. and S. Tikoo (2004), “Conceptualizing and Researching Employer Branding,” in:Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” in:Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. and A. Parasuraman (1991), Marketing Services. Competing Through Quali, New York:The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P.; Ewing, M. and L. L. Hah (2005), “Captivating Company: Dimensions of Attractiveness in Employer Branding,” in:International Journal, 24(2), 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmann, C. and S. Zeplin (2005), “Building Brand Commitment: A Behavioural Approach to Internal Brand Management,” in:Brand Management, 12(4), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M. and M. E. Graham (2000), “The Determinants of Organizational Reputation: A Job Search Perspective,” in:Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21(8), 929–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Walgren, C. J.; Ruble, C. A. and N. Donthu (1995), “Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent,” in:Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. J. and C. K. Stevens (2002), “The Relationship Between Early Recruitment-related Activities and the Application Decisions of New Labor-market Entrants: A Brand Equity Approach to Recruitment,” in:Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1121–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2008), “Employer Branding and its Influence on Managers,” in:European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E.; Dukerich, J. M. and C. V. Harquail (1994), “Organizational Images and Member Identification,” in:Administration Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. R. (2010), “An Integrative Review of Employer Branding and OB Theory,” in:Personnel Review, 39(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, M. T.; Pitt, L. F.; De Bussy, N. M. and P. Berthon (2002), “Employment Branding in the Knowledge Economy,” in:International Journal of Advertising, 21(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (2007), “Involving Stakeholders in Developing Corporate Brands: The Communication Dimension,” in:Journal of Marketing Management, 23(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J. and M. Schultz (2003), “Bringing the Corporation into Corporate Branding,” in:European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1041–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, R. H. (1980), “Clothing as Communication: an Empirical investigation,” in:Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-based Brand Equity,” in:Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. and S. Highhouse (2003), “The Relation of Instrumental and Symbolic Attributes to a Company’s Attractiveness as an Employer,” in:Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum, S. (2000), “Highly Skilled Globetrotters: Mapping the International Migration of Human Capital,” in:R&D Management, 30(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G.; Beaumont, P.; Doig, R. and J. Pate (2005), “Branding: A New Performance Discourse for HR?,” in:European Management Journal, 23(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and M. A. Huberman (1994), “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook,”, 338. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroko, L. and M. D. Uncles (2008), “Characteristics of Successful Employer Brands,” in:Journal of Brand Management, 16(3), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. (1961), Reality in Advertising, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S. and G. Davies (2007), “The Corporate Brand: Dealing with Multiple Stakeholders,” in:Journal of Marketing Management, 23(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smidts, A.; Pruyn, A. T. H. and C. B. M. Van Riel (2001), “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification,” in:Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. (1994), “Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research,” in:Journal of Consumer Research, 21(12), 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. (2004), “The 8 Elements of a Successful Employment Brand,” ER Daily, [http://www.ere.net/2004/02/].

  • Turban, D. W. and D. W. Greening(1996), “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees,” in:Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, K. and M. Poole (1997), “Organizing Employ ement for High Performance: Theories, Evidence and Policy,” in:Organization Studies, 18(5), 745–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windolf, P. (1986), “Recruitment, Selection, and Internal Labour Markets in Britain and Germany;” in:Organization Studies, 7(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hochegger, S., Terlutter, R. (2012). Why Organizations Systematically Engage in Employer Branding: A Conceptual Framework. In: Eisend, M., Langner, T., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III). European Advertising Academy. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4291-3_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics