Skip to main content

The Perceived Usefulness of Online Review Sets: The Role of Balance and Presentation Order

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III)

Abstract

Online consumer reviews are one of the various forms of eWOM that have challenged the interest of both researchers and practitioners. Such online articulation can contain evaluative information about a certain object and may be useful for potential consumers in determining whether they should or should not buy the product (Chen and Xie, 2008). Prospective consumers are more likely to use a brand recommended by satisfied previous users than marketing-related sources, because information coming from other consumers are considered more truthful and relevant (Bickart and Schindler, 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahluwalia, R. and Z. Gurhan-Canli (2000), “The Effects of Extensions on the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, M. (2000), “Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes,” in: European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R. (2000), “Behavioral Observation and Coding,” New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Sonsiderations,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickart, B. and R. M. Schindler (2001), “Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, G. C. and A. Kumar (2000), “Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1–2), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnkrant, R. E. and A. Cousineau (1975), “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A.; Liu, Y. and T. Mazumdar (2010), “The Differential Effects of Online Word-of- Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-Release Movie Evaluation,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and J. Xie (2008), “Online Consumer Review: A New Element of Marketing Communications Mix,” in: Management Science, 54(3), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K.; Lee, M. K. O. and N. Rabjohn (2008), “The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth – the Adoption of Online Opinions in Online Customer Communities,” in: Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A. and D. Mayzlin (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J.-S. and C. Cheng (2003), “Should a Company Have Message Boards on Its Web Sites?,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968), “Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit,” in: Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981), “On the Generality of Some Memory Laws,” in: Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M. and M. J. Watkins (1973), “The Role of Rehearsal in Short-Term Memory,” in: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. and R. A. Kaufman (1957), “Serial Effects in Recall of Unorganized and Sequentially Organized Verbal Material,” in: Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, S.-J. and J.-S. Hwang (2009), “How Consumers Evaluate Ewom (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) Messages,” in: Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W.; Gu, B. and A. B. Whinston, A. B. (2008), “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data,” in: Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M. and P. Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model – How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E. and D. Horowitz (2006), “Measuring Motivations for Online Opinion Seeking,” in: Journal of interactive advertising, 6(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T.; Moller Jensen, J. and H. Stubbe Solgaard (2004), “Predicting Online Grocery Buying Intention: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” in: International Journal of Information Management, 24(6), 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugtvedt, C. P. and D. T. Wegener (1994), “Message Order Effects in Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Perspective,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K. P.; Walsh, G. and D. D. Gremler (2004), “Electronic Word-of- Mouth Via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?,” in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A. L.; Krosnick, J. A.; Visser, P. S.; Gardner, W. L. and J. T. Cacioppo (2001), “Attitudes toward Presidential Candidates and Political Parties: Initial Optimism, Inertial First Impressions, and a Focus on Flaws, in: American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 930–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I.; Janis, I. L. and H. H. Kelley (1953), “Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change, “ New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. G. (1996), “Negativity in Impressions of Presidential Candidates Revisited: The 1992 Election,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H. E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Involvement,” in: Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavidge, R. J. and G. A. Steiner (1961), “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” in: Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.; Park, D.-H. and I. Han (2008), “The Effect of Negative Online Consumer Reviews on Product Attitude: An Information Processing View,” in: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, D. M. and A. G. Asuncion (1990), “On-Line and Memory-Based Modification of Attitudes: Determinants of Message Recall-Attitude Change Correspondence,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1962), “The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall,” in: Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D.-H. and S. Kim (2008), “The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Via Online Consumer Reviews,” in: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnawirawan, N. A.; De Pelsmacker, P. and N. Dens (2010), “Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: The Wrap Effect,” 9th International Conference on Research in Advertising (Icoria) Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundus, D. and R. C. Atkinson (1970), “Rehearsal Processes in Free Recall: A Procedure for Direct Observation,” in: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(1), 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. A. (2002), “Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S. and T. K. Srull (1989), “Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context,” Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, D.; Bond, S. and H. Zhang (2010), “Are Bad Reviews Always Stronger Than Good? Asymmetric Negativity Bias in the Formation of Online Consumer Trust,” ICIS Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Purnawirawan, N., De Pelsmacker, P., Dens, N. (2012). The Perceived Usefulness of Online Review Sets: The Role of Balance and Presentation Order. In: Eisend, M., Langner, T., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III). European Advertising Academy. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4291-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics