Advertisement

Diversity research—what do we currently know about how to manage diverse organizational units?

  • Eric Kearney
  • Sven C. Voelpel
Part of the ZfB-Special Issues book series (ZFB)

Abstract

Diversity with respect to demographic variables such as gender, age, and cultural background, as well as directly job-related characteristics such as tenure, educational specialization, and functional background is both a challenge and an opportunity. We review the extant literature on how best to manage diverse organizational units. We discuss the definition and conceptualizationof diversity, its direct effects on team performance and team member satisfaction, as well as the mediating variables that explain these effects and the moderating variables that determine when the positive effects of diversity are likely to prevail over the negative effects. We conclude by offering managerial suggestions on how to leverage diversity’s potential.

Keywords

Team heterogeneity Demographic diversity Job-related diversity Team performance Team member satisfaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agars MD, Kottke JL (2004) Models and practice of diversity management: a historical review and presentation of a new integration theory. In: Stockdale MS, Crosby FJ (eds) The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 55–77Google Scholar
  2. Bass BM, Riggio RE (2006) Transformational leadership. Erlbaum, MahwahCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biemann T, Kearney E (2010) Size does matter: how varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organ Res Methods 13:582–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers C, Pharmer JA, Salas E (2000) When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: a meta-analysis. Small Group Res 31:305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S (2007) Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: the information asymmetries model. Acad Manag Rev 32:459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein J, JarvisWBG (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychol Bull 119:197–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E (2004) Identifying the ingroup: a closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad Manag Rev 29: 180–202Google Scholar
  8. Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ Sci 3:179–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Adm Sci Q 46:229–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32:1199–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP (1998) Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad Manag J 41:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep- level diversity on group functioning. Acad Manag J 45:1029–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hays-Thomas KM (2004) Why now? The contemporary focus on managing diversity. In: Stockdale MS, Crosby FJ (eds) The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 31–52Google Scholar
  14. Homan AC, Van Knippenberg D, Kleef GA, de Dreu CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J Appl Psychol 92:1189–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Homan AC, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey S, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR,Van Kleef GA(2008) Facing differences with an open mind: openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad Manag J 51:1204–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J Manag 33:987–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson SF, Joshi A (2011)Work team diversity. In: Zedeck S (ed) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 1, APA, Washington, pp 651–686Google Scholar
  18. Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J Manag 29:801–830Google Scholar
  19. Jehn KE, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Adm Sci Q 44:741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: a meta-analytic review. Acad Manag J 52:599–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol 89:755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaas L, Manger C (2010) Ethnic discrimination in Germany’s labour market: a field experiment. Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 4741Google Scholar
  23. Kearney E, Gebert D (2009) Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. J Appl Psychol 94:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel S (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams: the importance of team members’ need for cognition. Acad Manag J 52:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 23:325–340Google Scholar
  26. Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Acad Manag J 48:645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrence BS (1997) The black box of organizational demography. Organ Sci 8:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: a new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and dis- integration in work teams. Acad Manag J 48:794–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mannix E, Neale MA(2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychol Sci Public Interest 6:31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milliken F, Martins L (1996) Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 21:402–433Google Scholar
  31. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Adm Sci Q 44:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rico R, Molleman E, Sànchez-Manzanares M, Van Der Vegt G (2007) The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration. J Manag 33: 111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberge M-É, van Dick R (2010) Recognizing the benefits of diversity: when and how does diversity increase group performance? Hum Resour Manag Rev 20:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sawyer JE, Houlette MA, Yeagley EL (2006) Decision performance and diversity structure: comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 99:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL,Wienk JA (2003) Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J Organ Behav 24:779–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin SJ, Zhou J (2007) When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J Appl Psychol 92:1709–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somech A (2006) The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. J Manag 32:132–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stahl GK, Maznevski ML, Voigt A, Jonsen K (2010) Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: a meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. J Int Bus Stud 41:690–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart GL (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J Manag 32:29–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stockdale MS, Cao F (2004) Looking back and heading forward: major themes of the psychology and management of workplace diversity. In: Stockdale MS, Crosby FJ (eds) The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 299–316Google Scholar
  41. Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: the effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decis Negot 12:217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van derVegt GS, Janssen O(2003) Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J Manag 29:729–751Google Scholar
  43. Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Acad Manag J 48:532–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Dick R, van Knippenberg D, Hagele S, Guillaume YRF, Brodbeck FC (2008) Group diversity and group identification: the moderating role of diversity beliefs. Hum Relat 61:1463–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007)Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol 58:515–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Knippenberg D,De Dreu CKW, Homan AC(2004)Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89:1008–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 40:145–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. J Manag 27:141–162Google Scholar
  49. Wegge J, Roth C, Neubach B, Schmidt K-H, Kanfer R (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. J Appl Psychol 93:1301–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. West MA (1996) Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: a conceptual integration. In: West MA (ed) Handbook of work group psychology.Wiley, London, pp 525–579Google Scholar
  51. Williams K, O’Reilly CIII (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of forty years of research. In: Sutton RI, BM Staw (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 20, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 77–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Gabler | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Kearney
    • 1
  • Sven C. Voelpel
    • 2
  1. 1.GISMA Business SchoolLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.EBS Business SchoolJacobs University BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations