Final discussion and implications

  • Philipp H. Hoff
Part of the Schriften zum europäischen Management book series (SEM)


The theoretical framework proposed the greentech financial innovation growth cycle as a way to integrate three distinct bodies of literature, in addition to political considerations. The framework was shown to clearly present the collected data. However, comparative analysis reveals a number of lessons to be learned. First, capital provided by friends and family seems to play a more important role than was originally anticipated. Second, inside finance remains the most important financing means throughout all phases, not only in the early days when a firm is becoming established. Third, the distinctions drawn between types of innovation did not yield sufficient insights. It does, however, appear that overall (incremental and non- incremental) innovation output increases up to the expansion state and diminishes thereafter. Fourth, firms in the early growth state and start-up firms experience the strongest firm growth. And lastly, government funds not only support early-state firms, but are also extensively used by expanding and even mature firms.


Venture Capital Financial Constraint Innovative Firm Innovation Output Capital Endowment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp H. Hoff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations