Integrity Check of Remote Computer Systems Trusted Network Connect

  • Marian Jungbauer
  • Norbert Pohlmann


The economic dependence on fast and inexpensive exchange of information that has arisen as a result of globalisation is leading to ever increasing levels of networking. The internet provides a communication infrastructure that is available worldwide. However, it does not provide for trustworthy communication, as it is not possible to assess the computer systems in the network with respect to their system integrity and trustworthiness. The same also applies to intranets. Visitors and field workers who use their computer systems both inside and outside the company network represent a threat to the company through these computer systems. By using the computer systems outside the company network they are also working outside the protective measures and control area of the company’s IT. Solution approaches such as Trusted Network Connect (TNC) provide methods for determining the integrity of end points which serve as a basis for trustworthy communication. The configurations of the end points can be measured on both the software and hardware level. It is possible to realise policy-controlled access control through the reconciliation of defined safety rules.


Computer System Connection Request Trusted Platform Module Trust Network Access Requestor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Cisc04]
    Cisco Systems GmbH, Die Evolution des Self-Defending Network, 2004 AT/pdfs/prospekte/Securtiy_CNAC_032004.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. [Emsc07]
    Das EMSCB-Projekt, www.emscb.deGoogle Scholar
  3. [Heis07]
    News: Ciscos Netzwerkzugangskontrolle NAC ausgetrickst — März 2007 newsticker/meldung/mai 1/87663Google Scholar
  4. [Hart05]
    Michael Hartmann, Trusted Network Connect — Netzwerkhygiene auf hohem Niveau, 2005, Datens-chutz und Datensicherheit (DuD)Google Scholar
  5. [Ietf07]
    Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements, Mai 2007 internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-requirements-02.txtGoogle Scholar
  6. [JuPo06]
    M. Jungbauer, N. Pohlmann: „Vertrauenswürdige Netzwerkverbindungen mit Trusted Computing-Sicher vernetzt?“ IT-Sicherheit — Management und Praxis, DATAKONTEXT-Fachverlag, 6/2006Google Scholar
  7. [MicrOöa]
    Microsoft Corporation, Network Access Protection — Homepage 2006 technet/network/nap/default.mspxGoogle Scholar
  8. [Micr06b] Microsoft Corporation, Cisco and Microsoft Unveil Joint Architecture forNAC-NAP Interoperability, 2006 Scholar
  9. [Trus06]
    Trusted Computing Group: Trusted Network connect Subgroup, 2006 Scholar
  10. [Tru+06]
    Trusted Computing Group, TCG Trusted Network Connect TNC Architecture for Interoperability, 2006 https://www. tru s/TNC/TNC_Architecture_vl_2_r4.pdGoogle Scholar
  11. [Trus07a] Microsoft and Trusted Computing Group Announce Interoperability, Mai 2007 ss/TNC_NAP_interop_release_final_may_l 8.pdGoogle Scholar
  12. [Trus07b] TCG TNC IF-TNCCS: Protocol Bindings for SoH, Mai 2007 specs/TNC/IF-TNCCS-SOHv L0_r8.pdGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian Jungbauer
    • 1
  • Norbert Pohlmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachhochschule GelsenkirchenGermany

Personalised recommendations