Abstract
This paper considers issues of trust and privacy in healthcare around increased data-sharing through Electronic Health Records (EHRs). It uses a model structured around different aspects of trust in the healthcare organisation’s reasons for greater data-sharing and their ability to execute EHR projects, particularly any associated confidentiality controls. It reflects the individual’s personal circumstances and attitude to use of health records.
This model is extended by considering the relative gains and risks from greater data-sharing as viewed by population segments to give a range of ‘attitudes’: positive, negative, ambivalent/marginal, or contingent.
The model is compared with results from a recent literature survey by the authors published by the UK General Medical Council (GMC) on Public and Professional Attitudes to Privacy.
Various policy options are considered which may modify attitudes to make the proposal more or less attractive to patients, recognising that there are those that have little to gain or will always view the proposition of EHRs negatively, and that time and experience may be needed to resolve doubts.
The paper does not consider legal questions of privacy and medical confidentiality, although the authors are very familiar with these, preferring to focus on how to meet public expectations and concerns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
MORI: Trust in Professions, 2007: www.ipsos-mori.com/_assets/polls/2007/pdf/trust-in-professions-2007.pdf
MORI: The Use of Personal Health Information in Medical Research, Medical Research Council, 2007, www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC003810.
Medical Privacy and Confidentiality Survey by Princeton Associates: www.chcf.org/documents/healthit/survey.pdf
Holahan CJ, Slaikeu KA., Effects of contrasting degrees of privacy on client self-disclosure in a counselling setting. J Couns Psychol 1977;24: p. 55–59.
Harris Polls: The Harris Poll #27, 2007: Many U.S. Adults are Satisfied with Use of Their Personal Health Information www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=743
Singleton P, Lea N, Tapuria A, Kalra D. Public and Professional attitudes to privacy of healthcare data: a survey of the literature. General Medical Council 2008 www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/news_consultation/GMCPrivacy_Attitudes_Final_Report_with_Addendum.pdf
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party of Data Protection: Working Document on the processing of personal data relating to health in electronic health records (EHR), European Commission, 2007, http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wpl3l_en.pdf
Anderson, RJ. Security Engineering, Wiley 2001 - measures to avoid ‘blagging’ and other social engineering attacks [p167–168]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Vieweg+Teubner | GWV Fachverlage GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singleton, P., Kalra, D. (2009). Trust and Privacy in Healthcare. In: Gawrock, D., Reimer, H., Sadeghi, AR., Vishik, C. (eds) Future of Trust in Computing. Vieweg+Teubner. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9324-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9324-6_12
Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner
Print ISBN: 978-3-8348-0794-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-8348-9324-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)