Happiness and the Family 2.0 Paradigm

  • Rodica Mocan
  • Stefana Racorean


Does new media technology have the potential to make us happier? This paper explores the influence of new information communication technologies on family life satisfaction while analyzing some of the factors that determine changes in the way we live our lives in the information age. Family 2.0 is the new paradigm of family life and the emergence of Web 2.0 type of applications is at the very core of its existence.


Technology Adoption Information Communication Technology Computer Mediate Communication Work Related Activity Family Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Crossley, A.; Langdridge, D. (2005), „Perceived Sources of Happiness: A Network Analysis“, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. English-Lueck, J. A., (1998). “Technology and Social Change: The Effects on Family and Community”, COSSA Congressional Seminar, Scholar
  3. Jaffe, J. M., Aidman, A. (1998). “Families, Geographical Separation, and the Internet: A Theoretical Prospectus”, U.S. Department of Education, Educational Resources Information Center, pp. 177–187.Google Scholar
  4., August 2007Google Scholar
  5. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay T., Szczypula J., Kiesler S., Scherlis (1999). “Information and Communication: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households”, in Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, no.4, December, pp.287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6., August 2007Google Scholar
  7. Legget, C., Clark, T. (2007). “Yahoo! And OMD Research Shows Resurgence of Traditional Values among Today’s Tech-Savvy Families”, Press Release., August 30, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Mocan, R., Racorean, S. (2006), New media technologies and communication in families separated through migration, Second International Conference of Family Psychotherapy and Systemic Practice, Timisoara.Google Scholar
  9. Olsen, Stephanie. (2006). “Here Come the Family 2.0’ sites, in ZDNet News, Jun. 2,, august 2007Google Scholar
  10. Racorean, S., Axente, A. (2006). “Approaches of happiness: Implications for couple and family therapy”, Second International Conference of Family Psychotherapy and Systemic Practice, Timisoara.Google Scholar
  11. Rompaey V. V., Roe K. (2001). “Families’ Conception of Space and the Information and Communication Technologies in the Home”, U.S. Department of Education, Educational Resources Information Center, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
    nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED453556&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED453556, August 2007Google Scholar
  13. Ryan, R.; Deci, E. (2001), “On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being”, Annual Revue of Psychology, 52: 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schnell Jim. (2005), “The Impact of New Communication Technologies and Channels on the Historically Basic Channels of Communication”Google Scholar
    nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED490655&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=eric_accno&accno=ED490655, august 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Todd Kappelman, (updated 2002, July). Marshall McLuhan: “The Medium is the Message”,, October 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Weatherall, A., Ramsay, A. (2006), ‘New Communication Technologies and Family Life“, Blue Skies Fund,, 30 Aug. 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Vieweg+Teubner | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodica Mocan
    • 1
  • Stefana Racorean
    • 1
  1. 1.Romania

Personalised recommendations