Noncommutative Geometry and Number Theory pp 205-216 | Cite as

# Phase transitions with spontaneous symmetry breaking on Hecke C^{*}-algebras from number fields

## Abstract

When one attempts to generalize the results of Bost and Connes [BC] to algebraic number fields, one has to face sooner or later the fact that in a number field there is no unique factorization in terms of primes. As is well known, this failure is twofold: the ring of integers has nontrivial units, and even if one considers integers modulo units, (equivalently the principal integral ideals), it turns out that factorization in terms of these can fail too, essentially because ‘irreducible’ does not mean ‘prime’. The first difficulty, with the units, already arises in the situation of [BC], Remark 33.b], but is easily dealt with by considering elements fixed by a symmetry corresponding to complex conjugation. In the existing generalizations the lack of unique factorization has been dealt with in various ways. It has been eliminated, through replacing the integers by a principal ring that generates the same field [HLe], it has been sidestepped, by basing the construction of the dynamical system on the additive integral adeles with multiplication by (a section of) the integral ideles [Coh], and it has been ignored, by considering an almost normal subgroup that makes no reference to multiplication [ALR]. These simplifications make the construction and analysis of interesting dynamical systems possible, but they come at a price. Indeed, the noncanonical choices introduced in [HLe] and [Coh] lead to phase transitions with groups of symmetries that are not obviously isomorphic to actual Galois groups of maximal abelian extensions, and have slightly perturbed zeta functions in the case of [HLe], while the units not included in the almost normal subgroup in [ALR], reappear as a (possibly infinite) group of symmetries under which KMS states have to be invariant, which causes severe difficulties in their computation.

## Keywords

Normal Subgroup Galois Group Class Number Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Double Coset## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [ALR]J. Arledge, M. Laca, I. Raeburn,
*Semigroup crossed products and Hecke algebras arising from number fields*, Doc. Math.**2**(1997) 115–138.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [Bi]M.W. Binder,
*Induced factor representations of discrete groups and their types*, J. Functional Analysis**115**(1993), 294–312.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [BC]J.-B. Bost and A. Connes,
*Hecke algebras, Type III factors and phase transitions with spontaneous symmetry breaking in number theory*, Sel. Math. (New Series)**1**(1995), 411–457.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [Coh]P. B. Cohen,
*A C*-dynamical system with Dedekind zeta partition function and spontaneous symmetry breaking*, Journées Arithmétiques de Limoges, 1997.Google Scholar - [CM]A. Connes and M. Marcolli,
*Quantum statistical mechanics of*Q*-lattices*, preprint (2004).Google Scholar - [HLe]D. Harari and E. Leichtnam,
*Extension du phénomène de brisure spontanée de symétrie de Bost-Connes au cas de corps globaux quelconques*, Sel. Math. (New Series),**3**(1997), 205–243.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [K]
- [L1]M. Laca,
*Semigroups of *-endomorphisms, Dirichlet series and phase transitions*, J. Funct. Anal.**152**(1998), 330–378.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [L2]M. Laca,
*From endomorphisms to automorphisms and back: dilations and full corners*, J. London Math. Soc.**61**(2000), 893–904.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [LLar1]M. Laca and N. S. Larsen,
*Hecke algebras of semidirect products*, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,**131**(2003), 2189–2199.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [LR1]M. Laca and I. Raeburn,
*Semigroup crossed products and the Toeplitz algebras of nonabelian groups*, J. Functional Analysis,**139**(1996), 415–440.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [LR2]M. Laca and I. Raeburn,
*A semigroup crossed product arising in number theory*, J. London Math. Soc.,(2)**59**(1999), 330–344.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [LvF]M. Laca and M. van Frankenhuijsen,
*Phase transitions on Hecke C*-algebras and classfield theory over*ℚ, preprint, 2004.Google Scholar - [N]S. Neshveyev,
*Ergodicity of the action of the positive rationals on the group of finite adeles and the Bost-Connes phase transition theorem*, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.**130**(2002), 2999–3003.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [Ni]A. Nica,
*C*-algebras generated by isometries and Wiener-Hopf operators*, J. Operator Theory**27**(1992), 17–52.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [Ta]J. T. Tate,
*Fourier Analysis in Number Fields and Hecke’s Zeta-Functions*, Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, N. J., 1950. (Reprinted in:*Algebraic Number Theory*, J. W. S. Cassels and A. Fröhlich (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1967, pp. 305–347.)Google Scholar - [Tz]K. Tzanev,
*Hecke C*-algebras and amenability*, J. Operator Theory**50**(2003), 169–178.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [We]A. Weil, Basic Number Theory, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.MATHGoogle Scholar