Skip to main content

Periarticular Reaction to Wear Debris of Different Ceramic Materials

  • Conference paper
Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

For the last 30 years Alumina and Zirconia ceramics constituted the ceramic materials used for the manufacturing of Total Joint Arthroplasty, thanks to the high biological and mechanical properties of these materials (Piconi and al, 2003; Piconi and Maccauro 1999). The new ceramic biocomposite ZPTA (Alumina Matrix Composites by Transformation Toughened and in situ Plateled Reinforcement) that is currently known as Biolox® delta, produced by CeramTec (namely ZPTA in the paper), improving the mechanical properties when compared to Alumina (Burger W. and Richter H.G. 2000), allowed to manufacture components which were not previously possible, and especially the small- diameter ball heads (<28 mm), thin-walled cup insert, knee and finger joints. Few paper reported the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility tests on this new material (Willmann, et al. 2000), and in particular as ceramic joints are intended for use in younger patient (Black 1997, Schmalzried 2001), hence the ones with longer life expectations, the study of the chronic effects of small particles, in term of local and systemic toxicity, including carcinogenesys becomes more and more relevant (Archimbeck et al. 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archibeck MJ, Jacobs JJ, Black J (2000) Alternate bearing surfaces in total joint arthroplasty: biologic considerations. Clin Orthop 379:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Black J (1997) Prospects for alternate Bearing surfaces in total hip replacement arthroplasty of the hip. In: Puhl W (ed) Performance of the wear couple BIOLOX Forte in hip arthroplasty, Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 2–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burger W, Richter HG (2000) High Strength and Toughness Alumina Matrix Composites by Transformation Toughened and in situ Plateled Reinforcement (ZPTA) — The New Generation of Bioceramics. Bioceramics 13: 545–548.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:649–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher J, Stone MH, Tipper JL, Ingham E. (2001) Wear debris generation with metal-on-polyethilene, Metal-on Metal, Ceramic-on-Ceramic hip prostheses. In: Rieker C, Oberholzer S, Wyss U (eds) World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty. Hans Huber, Bern, pp 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kubo T, Sawada K, Hirakava K, et al (1999) Histiocite reaction in rabbit femurs to UHMWPE, metal, and ceramic particles in different sizes. J Biomed Mater Res 45:363–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maccauro G, Piconi C, Muratori F, De Santis V, Burger W (2002) Tissue reactions to ceramic wear debris: clinical cases vs animal model (Proc. 8th BIOLOX Symp. Bioceramics in joint Arthroplasty, Zippel H and Dietrich M Eds) 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piconi C, Maccauro G., Muratori F., Brach del Prever E. (2003) Alumina and zirconia ceramics in joint replacements J. Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 1:19–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Piconi C. and Maccauro G. (1999) Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 20:1–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rae T (1986) The macrophage to implant materials with special reference to those used in Orthopaedics. CRC Crit Rev Biocomp 2: 97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ (1999) Current Concepts Review: Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A:115–136

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmalzried TP (2001) Patient activity and wear. In: Rieker C, Oberholzer S, Wyss U (eds) World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty. Hans Huber, Bern, 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sedel L (2001) Tribology of hip joint replacement. In: Surgical techniques in Orthopedics and Traumatology, Edition Scientifiques et Médicales Elsevier SAS, Paris, 55–430–E–l0

    Google Scholar 

  14. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, et al (2000) Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 82-A: 457–477

    Google Scholar 

  15. Willert MG, Broback LG, Buchan GM, et al (1996) Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacement. Clin Ortop 333:51–75

    Google Scholar 

  16. Willmann G, von Charnier W, Pfaff HG, Rock R (2000) Biocompatibility of a New Alumina Matrix Biocomposite AMG Bioceramics 13:569–572

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Yves Lazennec Martin Dietrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maccauro, G. et al. (2004). Periarticular Reaction to Wear Debris of Different Ceramic Materials. In: Lazennec, JY., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1462-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1968-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics