Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement: The American Experience with Stryker Implants

  • B. E. Bierbaum
  • J. D’Antonio
  • W. Capello
  • M. Manley
  • R. Deshmukh
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


A major challenge for total hip arthroplasty is to minimize wear and osteolysis in young, active patients. Alumina ceramic bearings have shown superior wear resistance and lubrication and do not carry the risk of ion release. In a prospective randomized study (ABC), 514 hips were implanted. All patients (average age, 53 years) received the same press-fit hydroxyapatite coated femoral stem; two thirds (345 hips) received alumina ceramic bearings, and one third (169 hips) received a cobalt-chrome-on-polyethylene bearing. A fourth arm (Trident) was included involving use of a metal-backed acetabular component implanted in 209 patients. At a mean follow-up of 35.2 months (range, 24–48 months), there was no significant difference in clinical performance between the patient cohorts. The cohort of patients included in the ABC, Trident, and extended access portion of the study represents a population of 2313 patients with no device related failures attributable to the ceramic on ceramic articulation used in these patients. This new experience involves the use of improved ceramic materials and new design considerations that eliminate the risks and complications of past experiences with ceramic implants and provides a safe bearing option for young patients.


Femoral Component Acetabular Component Radiolucent Line Acetabular Shell Ceramic Bearing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. l.
    Papatheofanis F: Technology report: prosthetic hip and knee arthroplasty. University Hospital Consortium (UHC) Technology Advancement Center, Oakbrook, IL, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black J: Prospects for alternate bearing surfaces in total replacement arthroplasty of the hip. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Ceramic Wear Couple, Stuttgart, Germany, 1997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, et al: Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old: clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1023, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahoney OM, Dimon JH: Unsatisfactory results with a ceramic total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:663, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeLee JG, Charnley J: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE: Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumbleton J: Wear and prosthetic joints. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1991Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Institute of Health: Total hip replacement. NIH Consensus Statement 1994. 12(5):1, 1994Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saikko VO, Paavolainen PO, Slatis PS: Wear of the polyethylene acetabular cup, metallic and ceramic heads compared in a hip simulator. Acta Orthop Scand 64:391, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris WH: Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geesink R, Hoefnagels N: Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:534, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmalzried T, Kwong L, Jasty M: Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: the role of polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:849, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M, et al: The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:575, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Giant TT, et al: Composition and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:60, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarke IC: Role of ceramic implants: design and clinical success with total hip prosthetic ceramic-to-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop 282:19, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sedel L, Kerboull L, Christel P, et al: Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement: results of survivorship in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:658, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lerouge S, Huk O, Yahia LH, et al: Ceramic-ceramic and metal-polyethylene total hip replacements: comparison of pseudomembranes after loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:135, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisher J, Besong AA, Firkins PJ, et al: Comparative wear debris generation in UHMWPE on ceramic metal on metal and ceramic on ceramic hip prostheses. Presented at 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, 2000Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skinner HB: Ceramic bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop 369:83, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Fritsch
    E, Gleitz M: Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 328:129, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Callaway GH, Flynn W, Ranawat C: Case report: fracture of the femoral head after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:855, 1995 MEDLINEPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Willmann
    G: Ceramic ball retrieval data. In: Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Ceramic Wear Couple, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heros RJ, Willmann G: Ceramics in total hip arthroplasty: history, mechanical properties, clinical results, and current manufacturing state of the art. Semin Arthroplasty 9:114, 1998Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heck DA, Partridge CM, Reuben JD, et al: Prosthetic component failures in hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 10:575, 1995 MEDLINEPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guarino J: Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements: back to the future. Orthopedic Special Edition 6, 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. E. Bierbaum
  • J. D’Antonio
  • W. Capello
  • M. Manley
  • R. Deshmukh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations