Advertisement

A Ten Years Experience with Alumina-Alumina Hip Replacement

  • G. Solarino
  • L. Scialpi
  • M. D’Anello
  • N. Tartaglia
  • O. De Carolis
  • G. B. Solarino
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)

Abstract

Polyethylene wear, due to a cascade of events activated from macrophages, is the main reason of bone resorption and periprosthetic osteolysis and usually takes to the failure of the implant.

Keywords

Acetabular Component Ceramic Component Frictional Torque Periprosthetic Osteolysis Additional Screw 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. l.
    Bizot P et al — Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Prostheses in Patients 40 Years of Age or Younger, CORR, 379:68–76, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizot P et al — Press-fit Metal Backed Alumina Sockets. A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study, CORR, 379:134–142, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boutin P — Arthroplastie totale de hance par prothèse en alumine frittee. Rev Chir Orthop 58:229–46, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charnley J — Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag,, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC and Harris WH — The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study, JBJS 81A(1), 66–73, 1999Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisher J, Ingham E, Stone MH — Alternative bearing couples in total hip replacements: solutions for young patients. Hip International, Vol. 13, n.l (suppl.2) pp. S31–S35, 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garino JP — Ceramic-Ceramic total hip Replacement: Intraoperative Considerations — Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty, edited by Aldo Toni and Gerd Willmann — Proceedings 6th International BIOLOX Symposium, March 23/24, 2001Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mendes DG et al — Ten rules of Technique for ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty — Bioceramics in Hip Joint Replacement, edited by Gerd Willmann and Karl Zweymüller — Proceedings 5th International CeramTec Symposium, Febr. 18/19, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mittelmeier H — Zementlose Verankerung von Endoprothesen nach dem Tragrippenprinzip. Z. Orthop. 112: 27–33, 1977Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pitto RP et al — Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study, Chir Organi Mov. Apr-Jun:86(2):87–97, 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prudhommeaux F et al — Analysis of Wear Behavior of AI/AI Hip Prosthesis after 10 years of implantation, in Legeros RZ and Legeros JP eds: Proceedings of the 1 lth International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, 1998Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sedel L et al — Alumina-Alumina Hip Replacement in Patients Younger than 50 years old, CORR, 298:175–183, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Solarino
  • L. Scialpi
  • M. D’Anello
  • N. Tartaglia
  • O. De Carolis
  • G. B. Solarino

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations