Skip to main content

Design Parameter to Improve Range of Motion (ROM) in Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Conference paper
Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty

Part of the book series: Ceramics in Orthopaedics ((CIO))

Abstract

Dislocation represents, after aseptic loosening, the second most frequent complication [1] in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an occurrence of 2–3% following a primary THA and 10% in revision arthroplasties [2]. Factors contributing to impingement and dislocation include soft tissue, bone components, orientation of the prosthesis, design of the implants [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giurea A et al: Risk factors for dislocation of a cement-free total hip endoprosthesis — a statistical analysis, Z Orthop 2001; 139: 194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrey BF: Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. Clin. Orthop. 1997, 344: 179–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siebenrock KA, Ganz R: The impingement problem in total hip arthroplasty, in: World tribology forum in arthroplasty/Claude Rieker. (ed.) — Berne, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Huber, 2001, 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noble PC, Paravic V, Ismaily S: Are big heads the solution to dislocation after total hip replacement? 48th Annual Meeting of the ORS, 2002, paper 0129

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burroughs BR, Rubash HE, Harris WH: Femoral head sizes larger than 32mm against highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 405, 2002, 150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Mittelmeier W: The importance of prosthesis head design in terms of risk of dislocation following artificial hip replacement — a biomechanical analysis. Orthopädische Praxis 39, 7, 2003, 430–435

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rieker CR et al: In-vitro tribology of large metal-on-metal implants — influence of the clearance, 50th Annual Meeting of the ORS, 2004, paper 123

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saikko V, Pfaff HG: Low wear and friction in alumina/alumina total hip joint: a hip simulator study. Acta Orthop. Scand. 69, 1998, 443–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muratoglu OK et al: Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 16(8), Suppl. 1, 2002, 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Yves Lazennec Martin Dietrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oehy, J., Bider, K. (2004). Design Parameter to Improve Range of Motion (ROM) in Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: Lazennec, JY., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1462-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1968-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics