Charnley-Kerboull Total Hip Arthroplasty Combining Zirconia on Polyethylene A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Prospective Study

  • M. Hamadouche
  • F. Madi
  • L. Kerboull
  • J. -P. Courpied
  • M. Kerboull
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


Polyethylene wear and polyethylene particles induced periprosthetic osteolysis remains currently the major limitation to the long-term performance of total hip arthroplasty. To reduce polyethylene wear, P. Boutin introduced alumina ceramic femoral heads in the early 1970’s. However, the relative brittle nature of alumina was responsible for a high rate of fracture. Improvement in the manufacturing process with a low grain size and grain distribution dramatically decreased the risk of crack propagation and rate of fracture. Despite these improvements, the use of 22.2-mm diameter alumina ceramic femoral head is not recommended in Europe.


Femoral Head Radiolucent Line Polyethylene Wear Proc Inst Zirconia Particle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Allain J, Le Mouel S, Goutallier D, Voisin MC (1999) Poor eight-year survival of cemented zirconia-polyethylene total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81-B:835–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boutin P (1972) Arthroplastie totale de la hanche par prothèse en alumine fittée. Etude expérimentale et premères applications cliniques. Rev Chir Orthop 58:229–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cales B (2000) Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data. Clin Orthop 379:94–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caton J, Merabet Z, Reynaud P, Termanian PJ (2001) Etude comparative de l’usure de deux séries de prothèses totales de hanche (tête 22,225 mm, zircone/PE et métal/PE). Proceedings of the 76th SoFCOT, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christel P (1992): Biocompatibility of surgical-grade dense polycrystalline alumina. Clin Orthop 282:10–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke IC, Gustafson A (2000) Clinical and hip simulator comparisons of ceramic-on-polyethylene and metal-on-polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop 379:34–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Lee J, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121: 20–32.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Derbyshire B, Fisher J, Dowson D, Hardaker C, Brummitt K (1994) Comparative study of the wear of UHMWPE with zirconia ceramic and stainless steel femoral heads in artificial hip joints. Med Eng Phys 16:229–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldsmith AA, Dowson D (1999) A multi-station hip joint simulator study of theperformance of 22 mm diameter zirconia-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene total replacement hip joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng 213: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldsmith AA, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Lancaster JG (2000) A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng 214:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodman S, Huie P, Song Y, et al. (1997) Loosening and osteolysis of cemented joint arthroplasties. A biologic spectrum. Clin Orthop 337:149–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141: 17–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamada Y, Horiuchi T, Sano Y, Usui I (1999) The wear of a polyethylene socket articulating with a zirconia ceramic femoral head in canine total hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res 48:301–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haraguchi K, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki, H, Oka, K, Yoshikawa, H (2001) Phase transformation of a zirconia ceramic head after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:996–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiranek WA, Machado M, Jasty M, et al. (1993) Production of cytokines around loosened cemented acetabular components. Analysis with immunohistochemical techniques and in situ hybridization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75: 863–879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH (2001) A comparison of polyethylene wear in hips with cobaltchrome or zirconia heads. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:742–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar P, Oka M, Ikeuchi K, et al. (1991) Low wear rate of UHMWPE against zirconia ceramic (Y-PSZ) in comparison to alumina ceramic and SUS 316L alloy. J Biomed Mater Res 25:813–828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lancaster JG, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Fisher J (1997) The wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sliding on metallic and ceramic counterfaces representative of current femoral surfaces in joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng 211:17–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Livermore J, IIstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:518–528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu Z, McKellop H (1997) Frictional heating of bearing materials tested in a hip joint wear simulator. Proc Inst Mech Eng 211: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lu Z, McKellop H, Liao P, Benya P (1999) Potential thermal artifacts in hip joint wear simulators. J Biomed Mater Res 48:458–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Harris WH, Galante, JO, Callaghan, JJ (1990) Endosteal erosion in association with stable uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1025–1034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merled’Aubigné R (1970) Cotation chiffreé de la fonction de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 56:481–486.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piconi C, Burger W, Richter HG, et al. (1998) Y-TZP ceramics for artificial joint replacements. Biomaterials 19:1489–1494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Semlitsch M, Willert HG (1997) Clinical wear behaviour of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cups paired with metal and ceramic ball heads in comparison to metal-on-metal pairings of hip joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng 211:73–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hamadouche
  • F. Madi
  • L. Kerboull
  • J. -P. Courpied
  • M. Kerboull

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations