Ceramic on Ceramic Bearings Used with Proximal Modular Stems in THA

  • K. J. Keggi
  • J. M. Keggi
  • R. E. Kennon
  • T. McTighe
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


Introduction: Osteolysis generated by wear debris remains a problem in total hip arthroplasty. Alternate bearings surfaces are sought in an attempt to reduce debris particles and prolong prosthetic wear. Ceramic on ceramic surfaces have a long clinical history but have encountered a number of problems due to design and material properties. Impingement with malposition of the components, ceramic chipping, and ceramic fractures with malposition of the acetabular component have been problems.

Material: This paper will review 185 ceramic on ceramic bearings used with proximal modular stem designs. Two different stem designs and four different cup designs all utilizing ceramic heads and ceramic inserts manufactured by CeramTec were used.

Conclusion: The recent development of proximal femoral modular stem designs provides better surgical exposure and improved orientation of the prosthetic components. This will reduce the complications due to ceramic implants.


Acetabular Component Modular Design Ceramic Head Ceramic Liner Acetabular Liner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 152:255, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boutin P, Arthroplastie Totale de Hanche par Prosthes en Alumine Fritte, Rev Chir Orthop, Vol. 58:229–246, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Leary J., et al, Mittelmeier Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, Vol. 3:87–96, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahoney O., et al, Unsatisfactory Results with a Ceramic Total Hip Prosthesis, JBJS, Vol. 72-A:6623–671, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winter M, et al. Ten to 14 year results of a ceramic hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop, 282: 73–79, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mittelmeier H, Heisel J. Sixteen years of experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 282:64–72, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffinger SA, Keggi KJ, et al. Primary ceramic hip replacement: A prospective study of 119 Hips. Orthopedics. 14(5):523–31, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huo MH, Martin RP, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ. Total hip replacement using the ceramic Mittelmeier prosthesis. Clin Orthop 332:143–150, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DiCaprio M, Huo MH, Keggi JM, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in cementless THAs done in young patients: a 10-year follow-up study. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 69th Annual Meeting; February 13-17, 2002: Dallas, Texas. Paper 170Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toni A, et al. Ceramics in total hip arthroplasty. P1501-44. In: Wise DL, et al. (eds): Encyclopedic Handbook of Biomaterials and Bioengineering. Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willmann G. Ceramic Ball Head Retrieval Data, Reliability and Long-Term Results of Ceramics in Orthopaedics: 4th International CeramTec Symposium, 62–63, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garino J. Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacements: Back to the Future, Orthopedic Special Edition, Vol. 6 No. 1:41–43:2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Keggi
  • J. M. Keggi
  • R. E. Kennon
  • T. McTighe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations