Skip to main content

Biomechanik und Arthrose

Unikompartimentale Gonarthrose: Pathomechanismus

  • Chapter
Die unikondyläre Schlittenprothese Pro & Contra

Zusammenfassung

Die Physiologie und Biomechanik des Kniegelenks sind Themen der medizinischen Forschung seit dem frühen 19. Jahrhundert. Heute ermöglichen uns In-vitro- und In-vivo-Methoden mathematische Modelle zur Auswertung der statischen und dynamischen Kniefunktion zu erstellen (Abb. 1) [1–3, 33].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. King D (1936) The function of semilunar cartilages. J Bone and Joint Surg 18:1069–1076

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karrholm J, Brandsson S, Freeman MAR (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 4: changes of axial tibial rotation caused by forced rotation at the weight-bearing knee studied by RSA. J Bone and Joint Surg. 82(B):1201–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks SA (1992) Model based 3D kinematic estimation from 2D perspective silhouettes: application with total knee prostheses. PhD Dissertation. Massachusetts Institutte of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthetic design. J Bone and Joint Surg 60(B):358–369

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grelsamer RP (1995) Current concept review. Unicompartmental Osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone and Joint Surg 77(A):278–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen PR, Denham RA, Swan AV (1984) Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. J Bone and Joint Surg 66(B):666–671

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD (2001) The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 286(2):188–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Macnicol MF, Thomas NP (2000) The knee after meniscectomy (editorial). Journ Bone and Joint Surg 82(B):157–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone and Joint Surg 30(B):664–670

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reimann I (1973) Experimental osteoarthritis of the knee in rabbits induced by alteration of the load-bearing. Acta Orthop Scandinavica 44:496–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tetsworth K, Paley D (1994) Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthop Clin North America 25:367–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu DD, Burr DB, Boyd RD, Radin EL (1990) Bone and cartilage changes following experimental varus or valgus tibial angulation. J Orthop Res 8:572–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Radin EL, Burr DB, Caterson B, Fyhrie D, Brown TD, Boyd RD (1991) Mechanical determinants of osteoarthrosis. Sem Arthrit And Rheumat 21 (Suppl 2):12–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer GC, Insall J, Koshimo T (1969) Tibial osteotomy in gonarthrosis (osteo-arthritis of the knee). J Bone and Joint Surg 51(A):1545–1563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrington IJ (1983) Static and dynamic loading patterns in knee joints with deformities. J Bone and Joint Surg 65(A):247–259

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chao EY, Neluheni EV, Hsu RW, Paley D (1994) Biomechanics of malalignment. Orthop Clin North America 25:379–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson F, Leitl S, Waugh W (1980) The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements. J Bone and Joint Surg 62(B):346–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrington IJ (1976) A bioengeneering analysis of force actions at the knee in normal and pathological gait. Biomed Eng 11:167–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison JB (1968) Bioengeneering analysis of force actions transmitted by the knee joint. Biomed Eng 3:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paul JP (1970) The effect of walking speed on the force actions trasmitted at the hip and knee joints. Proc Roy Soc Med 63:200–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Current concept review. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone and joint Surg 71(A):145–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Noyes FR, Schipplein OD, Andreacchi TP, Saddemi SR, Waise M (1992) The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee with varus alignment. An analysis od gait adaptation and dynamic joint loadings. Am J Sports Med 20:707–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Romagnoli S (1996) The unicompartmental knee prosthesis and the rotatory gonarthrosis kinematic. Curr. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR (eds) Concepts in Primary and Revision Total knee Arthroplasty. Lippincot-Raven Pubb, Phil (MR), pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eckhoff DG, Johnston RJ, Stamm ER, Kilcoyne RF, Wiedel JD (1994) Version of the osteoarthritic knee. J Arthroplasty 9:73–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stussi E (1980) Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone and Joint Surg 62(B):238–242

    Google Scholar 

  26. Staheli LT (1977) Torsional deformity. Pediatr Clin North America 24:799–811

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Turner MS, Smillie IS (1981) The effect of tibial torsion on the pathology of the knee. J Bone and Joint Surg 63(B):396–398

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yagi T, Sasaki T (1986) Tibial torsion in patients with medial-type osteoarthritis knee. Clin Orthop 213:177–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morscher E (1985) Pathophysiology of posttraumatic deformities of the lower extremity. In: Hierholzer G, Müller KH (eds) Corrective Osteotomy of the Lower Extremity after trauma. Springer, New York, pp 3–8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Zucman J, Maurer P (1969) Two-level fractures of the tibia. Results in thirty-six cases treated by blind nailing. J Bone and Joint Surg 51(B):686–693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cooper C, Snow S, McAlindon TE, Kellingray S, Stuart B, Coggon D, Dieppe PA (2000) Risk factors for the incidence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthrit Rheumat 43:995–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cooper C, McAlindon TE, Snow S, Vines K, Young P, Kirwan J, Dieppe PA (1994) Mechanical and constitutional risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: differences between medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral disease. Journ Rheumatol 21:307–313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Banks SA, Boniforti F, Fregly BJ, Rahman H, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S (2003) The kinematics of deep flexion in bi-cruciate retaining resurfacing knee arthroplasty. Ann Meet Orthop Res Soc, New-Orleans LA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romagnoli, S., Boniforti, F., Cavazzuti, G., Castelnuovo, N., Verde, F. (2005). Biomechanik und Arthrose. In: Buckup, K. (eds) Die unikondyläre Schlittenprothese Pro & Contra. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1939-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1939-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62171-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1939-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics