Advertisement

Introduction to motion suppression and motion correction

  • Axel Bornstedt

Abstract

In an ideal world, the imaging object would not move during the magnetic resonance data acquisition. Motion leads to artifacts in the image, e.g., blurring or ghosting (multiple contours in phase encoding direction). Therefore, suitable measures have to be taken to inhibit motion and to suppress and/or correct for motion-related effects.

Keywords

Public Health Data Acquisition Imaging Object Motion Correction Suitable Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailes DR, Gilderdale DJ, Bydder GM et al (1985) Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artifacts in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9(4):835–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH (1999) Novel real-time R wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 42(2):361–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hackenbroch M, Hofer U, Yang A et al. (2002) 3D-Motion Adapted Gating (3D MAG): A New Navigator Technique for Accelerated Acquisition of Free Breathing Navigator Gated Coronary MR Angiography (MRA). MAGMA Vol. 15 Suppl. 1 Book of Abstracts ESMRMB 2002 # 172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jhooti P, Gatehouse PD, Keegan J et al. (2000) Phase Ordering With Automatic Window Selection (PAWS): a novel motion-resistant technique for 3D coronary imaging. Magn Reson Med 43:470–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kozerke S, Scheidegger MB, Pedersen EM et al. (1999) Heart motion adapted cine phase-contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve. Magn Reson Med 42:970–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li D, Kaushikkar S, Haacke EM et al. (1996) Coronary Arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with retrospective respiratory gating. Radiology 201:857–863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manke D, Nehrke K, Börnert P et al. (2002) Respiratory motion in coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a comparison of different motion models. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:661–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagel E, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B. et al. (1999) Optimization of realtime adaptive navigator correction for 3D magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Magn Reson Med 42:408–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Y, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL (1995) Respiratory motion of the heart: kinematics and the implications for the spatial resolution in coronary imaging. Magn Reson Med 33:713–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Bornstedt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations