Advertisement

Minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting via partial inferior sternotomy

  • K. Hakim
  • J. Börgermann

Abstract

Today, treatment of single vessel coronary artery disease is primarily the realm of catheter intervention. A number of current studies compared revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA, with or without stent placement) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the internal thoracic artery (ITA). The PTCA groups showed higher reintervention rates and in some studies an increased incidence of postinterventional myocardial infarctions [8-10]. Despite these observations and although the long-term results of ITA grafts are excellent [13, 14], most patients will favor the less invasive approach when given the choice between PTCA and CABG. Yet surgical revascularization of the LAD with an ITA graft can also be accomplished via a minimal invasive approach without extracorporeal circulation (ECC), using a technique called minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB). This technique could fill a gap in the treatment options and may at the same time allow surgical myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients. Initial data of a current randomized study show that on 6-month follow-up, revascularization by MIDCAB compares favorably with catheter interventional stent implantation when freedom of angina pectoris (79 vs. 62%) and reintervention rates (8 vs. 29%) are used as endpoints [7].

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Left Anterior Descend Right Coronary Artery Internal Mammary Artery Internal Thoracic Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Acuff TE, Landreneau RJ, Griffith BP, Mack MJ (1996) Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 61(1):135–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM (1996) Mini-sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 61(4):1271–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer M, Pasic M, Ewert R, Hetzer R (2001) Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: no difference in postoperative pulmonary function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121(4):702–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benetti FJ, Ballester C (1995) Use of thoracoscopy and a minimal thoracotomy, in mammary-coronary bypass to left anterior descending artery, without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 2 cases. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 36(2):159–161Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, Gallina S, Maddestra N, Paloscia L, et al (1998) Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (LAST operation). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(4):763–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Thalhammer M, Schutz A, Reichart B (2001) Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques — minithoracotomy or sternotomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19(4):464–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, Hambrecht R, Spyrantis N, Sick P, et al (2002) Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 347(8):561–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goy JJ, Eeckhout E, Moret C, Burnand B, Vogt P, Stauffer JC, et al (1999) Five-year outcome in patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis treated by angioplasty or left internal mammary artery grafting. A prospective trial. Circulation 99(25):3255–3259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goy JJ, Kaufmann U, Goy-Eggenberger D, Garachemani A, Hurni M, Carrel T, et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: the SIMA trial. Stenting vs Internal Mammary Artery. Mayo Clin Proc 75(11):1116–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hueb WA, Bellotti G, de Oliveira SA, Arie S, de Albuquerque CP, Jatene AD, et al (1995) The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 26(7):1600–1605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Izzat MB, Yim AP, El-Zufari MH, Khaw KS (1998) Upper T ministernotomy for aortic valve operations. Chest 114(1):291–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolessov VI (1967) Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54(4):535–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loop FD (1996) Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 334(4):263–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al (1986) Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 314(1):l–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moreno-Cabral RJ (1997) Mini-T sternotomy for cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 113(4):810–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robinson MC, Gross DR, Zeman W, Stedje-Larsen E (1995) Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a new method using an anterior mediastinotomy. J Card Surg 10(5):529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Subramanian VA (1996) Clinical experience with minimally invasive reoperative coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10(12):1058–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trehan N, Malhotra R, Mishra Y, Shrivastva S, Kohli V, Mehta Y (2000) Comparison of ministernotomy with minithoracotomy regarding postoperative pain and internal mammary artery characteristics. Heart Surg Forum 3(4):300–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walterbusch G (1998) Partial sternotomy for cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(1):256–258PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hakim
  • J. Börgermann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations