Skip to main content

Risikostratifikation und differenzierte Therapiekonzepte auf der Intensivstation bei Patienten mit akuter Lungenembolie

Risk stratification and therapy concepts for ICU patients with acute pulmonary embolism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neues aus Kardiologie und Rhythmologie

Auszug

Das kritische Ereignis in der Pathophysiologie der akuten Lungenembolie ist das Ausmaß der durch die Pulmonalwiderstandserhöhung bedingten rechtsventrikulären Dysfunktion, in dessen Folge es bedingt durch den erhöhten Sauerstoffbedarf, der induzierten myokar dialen Ischämie und der verminderten linksventrikulären Vorlast zu einem Abfall des Herzminutenvolumens kommen kann und in Folge zur Ausbildung eines kardiogenen Schocks. Diese klinische Situation stellt eine Notfallsituation dar mit einer Mortalität > 50%. Größere kontrollierte Studien zur prognostischen Bedeutung einer fibrinolytischen Therapie bei diesen Hochrisikopatienten liegen nicht vor, jedoch besteht Konsens, dass eine fibrinolytische Therapie die Therapie der Wahl darstellt bei Patienten mit massiver Lungenembolie und hämodynamischer Instabilität, wenn nicht absolute Kontraindikationen gegen eine solche Therapie vorliegen. In diesem Fall oder wenn unter der fibrinolytischen Therapie keine hämodynamische Stabilisierung möglich ist, stellen operative Embolektomie oder die kathetergestützte Thrombusfragmentation bzw. Thrombusaspiration gegebenenfalls in Kombination mit einer lokalen Thrombolyse eine therapeutische Alternative dar, auch wenn nur wenige Daten zu ihrer Effektivität und Sicherheit zugrunde gelegt werden können. Hingegen wird kontrovers diskutiert, inwieweit hämodynamisch stabile Patienten mit einer akuten Rechtsherzbelastung von einer thrombolytischen Therapie im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen Heparintherapie profitieren. Zwar steigen mit dem Nachweis der Rechtsherzbelastung auch beim hämodynamisch stabilen Patienten das Mortalitäts- als auch das Komplikationsrisiko, es stellt sich jedoch die Frage, ob dieses Risiko durch eine fibrinolytische Therapie gesenkt werden kann. Inwieweit durch die Kombination des Nachweises der Rechtsherzbelastung in der Bildgebung (Echokardiographie, Computertomographie) und der kardialen Biomarker Troponin T/I oder natriuretische Peptide Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) und N-terminal-proBNP als Hinweis auf eine myokardiale Schädigung diejenigen Patienten zuverlässiger erfasst werden können, die im Hinblick auf eine Verbesserung der Prognose von einer thrombolytischen Therapie profitieren, ist Gegenstand derzeit laufender und zukünftiger Studien.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Oger E (2000) Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 83:657–660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1998) Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 158:585–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai AW, Cushman M, Rosamond WD, Heckbert SR, Polak JF, Folsom AR (2002) Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Arch Intern Med 162:1182–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alpert JS, Smith R, Carlson J, Ockene IS, Dexter L, Dalen JE (1976) Mortality in patients treated for pulmonary embolism. JAMA 236:1477–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A et al (1992) The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 326: 1240–1245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353:1386–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A et al (1997) Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1165–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (1992) Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Lancet 340:873–876

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism (2000) Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 21:1301–1336

    Google Scholar 

  10. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism (2003) Thorax 58:470–483

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Management of massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 112:e28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The urokinase pulmonary embolism trial. A national cooperative study (1973) Circulation 47:II1–108

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tibbutt DA, Davies JA, Anderson JA et al (1974) Comparison by controlled clinical trial of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of life-threatening pulmonay embolism. Br Med J 1:343–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marini C, Di Ricco G, Rossi G, Rindi M, Palla R, Giuntini C (1988) Fibrinolytic effects of urokinase and heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. Respiration 54:162–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levine M, Hirsh J, Weitz J et al (1990) A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 98:1473–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. A collaborative study by the PIOPED Investigators (1990) Chest 97:528–533

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dalla-Volta S, Palla A, Santolicandro A et al (1992) PAIMS 2: alteplase combined with heparin versus heparin in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Plasminogen activator Italian multicenter study 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:520–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldhaber SZ, Haire WD, Feldstein ML et al (1993) Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: randomised trial assessing right-ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion. Lancet 341:507–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Urokinase-streptokinase embolism trial (1974) Phase 2 results. A cooperative study (1974) JAMA 229:1606–1613

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer G, Sors H, Charbonnier B et al (1992) Effects of intravenous urokinase versus alteplase on total pulmonary resistance in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a European multicenter double-blind trial. The European Cooperative Study Group for Pulmonary Embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:239–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldhaber SZ, Kessler CM, Heit J et al (1988) Randomised controlled trial of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Lancet 2:293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meneveau N, Schiele F, Metz D et al (1998) Comparative efficacy of a two-hour regimen of streptokinase versus alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism: immediate clinical and hemodynamic outcome and one-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 31: 1057–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sors H, Pacouret G, Azarian R, Meyer G, Charbonnier B, Simonneau G (1994) Hemodynamic effects of bolus vs 2-h infusion of alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Chest 106:712–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Verstraete M, Miller GA, Bounameaux H et al (1988) Intravenous and intrapulmonary recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 77:353–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, Heinrich F, Kasper W (2002) Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 347:1143–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanter DS, Mikkola KM, Patel SR, Parker JA, Goldhaber SZ (1997) Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and associated risk factors. Chest 111:1241–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldhaber SZ, Kessler CM, Heit JA et al (1992) Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus a novel dosing regimen of urokinase in acute pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:24–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Geibel A, Olschewski M, Zehender M, et al (2007) Possible gender-related differences in the risk-to-benefit ratio of thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 99:103–107. Epub 2006 Nov 9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ (2006) Massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 113:577–582. Epub 2006 Jan 23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wan S, Quinlan DJ, Agnelli G, Eikelboom JW (2004) Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Circulation 110:744–749. Epub 2004 Jul 19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Aklog L, Williams CS, Byrne JG, Goldhaber SZ (2002) Acute pulmonary embolectomy: a contemporary approach. Circulation 105:1416–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Augustinos P, Ouriel K (2004) Invasive approaches to treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110:127–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reekers JA, Baarslag HJ, Koolen MG, Van Delden O, van Beek EJ (2003) Mechanical thrombectomy for early treatment of massive pulmonary embolism. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:246–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Konstantinides S, Tiede N, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H, Kasper W (1998) Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for resolution of major pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 82:966–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dalen JE, Banas JS Jr, Brooks HL, Evans GL, Paraskos JA, Dexter L (1969) Resolution rate of acute pulmonary embolism in man. N Engl J Med 280:1194–1199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kasper W, Geibel A, Tiede N, Hofmann T, Meinertz T, Just H (1989) Echocardiography in the diagnosis of lung embolism. Herz 14:82–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldhaber SZ (2002) Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 136:691–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kasper W, Geibel A, Tiede N et al (1993) Distinguishing between acute and subacute massive pulmonary embolism by conventional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 70:352–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Tiede N, Krause T, Just H (1997) Prognostic significance of right ventricular afterload stress detected by echocardiography in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Heart 77:346–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P et al (2000) Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 101:2817–2822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Vieillard-Baron A, Page B, Augarde R et al (2001) Acute cor pulmonale in massive pulmonary embolism: incidence, echocardiographic pattern, clinical implications and recovery rate. Intensive Care Med 27:1481–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ribeiro A, Lindmarker P, Johnsson H, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Jorfeldt L (1999) Pulmonary embolism: one-year follow-up with echocardiography doppler and five-year survival analysis. Circulation 99:1325–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Arch Intern Med 165: 1777–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. ten Wolde M, Sohne M, Quak E, Mac Gillavry MR, Buller HR (2004) Prognostic value of echocardiographically assessed right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 164:1685–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Janata K, Holzer M, Laggner AN, Mullner M (2003) Cardiac troponin T in the severity assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism: cohort study. BMJ 326:312–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pruszczyk P, Bochowicz A, Torbicki A et al (2003) Cardiac troponin T monitoring identifies high-risk group of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 123: 1947–1952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M et al (2002) Importance of cardiac troponins I and T in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 106:1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Giannitsis E, Muller-Bardorff M, Kurowski V et al (2000) Independent prognostic value of cardiac troponin T in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism. Circulation 102:211–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bova C, Crocco F, Ricchio R, Serafini O, Greco F, Noto A (2005) Importance of troponin T for the risk stratification of normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism. A prospective, cohort study with a three-month follow-up. Haematologica 90:423–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. La Vecchia L, Ottani F, Favero L et al (2004) Increased cardiac troponin I on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in acute pulmonary embolism. Heart 90:633–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yalamanchili K, Sukhija R, Aronow WS, Sinha N, Fleisher AG, Lehrman SG (2004) Prevalence of increased cardiac troponin I levels in patients with and without acute pulmonary embolism and relation of increased cardiac troponin I levels with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 93:263–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 108:2191–2194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Binder L, Pieske B, Olschewski M et al (2005) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or troponin testing followed by echocardiography for risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 112:1573–1579 Epub 2005 Sep 6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kucher N, Printzen G, Doernhoefer T, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM (2003) Low pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels predict benign clinical outcome in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:1576–1578. Epub 2003 Mar 24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kucher N, Printzen G, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:2545–2547 Epub 2003 May 12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Pruszczyk P, Kostrubiec M, Bochowicz A et al (2003) N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 22:649–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. ten Wolde M, Tulevski, II, Mulder JW et al (2003) Brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:2082–2084. Epub 2003 Apr 21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kruger S, Graf J, Merx MW et al (2004) Brain natriuretic peptide predicts right heart failure in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J 147:60–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M et al (1997) Association between thrombolytic treatment and the prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. Circulation 96:882–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Steinkopff Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geibel, A., Bode, C., Konstantinides, S. (2008). Risikostratifikation und differenzierte Therapiekonzepte auf der Intensivstation bei Patienten mit akuter Lungenembolie. In: Trappe, HJ. (eds) Neues aus Kardiologie und Rhythmologie. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1886-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1886-5_9

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1885-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1886-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics