Auszug
Das kritische Ereignis in der Pathophysiologie der akuten Lungenembolie ist das Ausmaß der durch die Pulmonalwiderstandserhöhung bedingten rechtsventrikulären Dysfunktion, in dessen Folge es bedingt durch den erhöhten Sauerstoffbedarf, der induzierten myokar dialen Ischämie und der verminderten linksventrikulären Vorlast zu einem Abfall des Herzminutenvolumens kommen kann und in Folge zur Ausbildung eines kardiogenen Schocks. Diese klinische Situation stellt eine Notfallsituation dar mit einer Mortalität > 50%. Größere kontrollierte Studien zur prognostischen Bedeutung einer fibrinolytischen Therapie bei diesen Hochrisikopatienten liegen nicht vor, jedoch besteht Konsens, dass eine fibrinolytische Therapie die Therapie der Wahl darstellt bei Patienten mit massiver Lungenembolie und hämodynamischer Instabilität, wenn nicht absolute Kontraindikationen gegen eine solche Therapie vorliegen. In diesem Fall oder wenn unter der fibrinolytischen Therapie keine hämodynamische Stabilisierung möglich ist, stellen operative Embolektomie oder die kathetergestützte Thrombusfragmentation bzw. Thrombusaspiration gegebenenfalls in Kombination mit einer lokalen Thrombolyse eine therapeutische Alternative dar, auch wenn nur wenige Daten zu ihrer Effektivität und Sicherheit zugrunde gelegt werden können. Hingegen wird kontrovers diskutiert, inwieweit hämodynamisch stabile Patienten mit einer akuten Rechtsherzbelastung von einer thrombolytischen Therapie im Vergleich zu einer alleinigen Heparintherapie profitieren. Zwar steigen mit dem Nachweis der Rechtsherzbelastung auch beim hämodynamisch stabilen Patienten das Mortalitäts- als auch das Komplikationsrisiko, es stellt sich jedoch die Frage, ob dieses Risiko durch eine fibrinolytische Therapie gesenkt werden kann. Inwieweit durch die Kombination des Nachweises der Rechtsherzbelastung in der Bildgebung (Echokardiographie, Computertomographie) und der kardialen Biomarker Troponin T/I oder natriuretische Peptide Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) und N-terminal-proBNP als Hinweis auf eine myokardiale Schädigung diejenigen Patienten zuverlässiger erfasst werden können, die im Hinblick auf eine Verbesserung der Prognose von einer thrombolytischen Therapie profitieren, ist Gegenstand derzeit laufender und zukünftiger Studien.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Oger E (2000) Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 83:657–660
Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1998) Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 158:585–593
Tsai AW, Cushman M, Rosamond WD, Heckbert SR, Polak JF, Folsom AR (2002) Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Arch Intern Med 162:1182–1189
Alpert JS, Smith R, Carlson J, Ockene IS, Dexter L, Dalen JE (1976) Mortality in patients treated for pulmonary embolism. JAMA 236:1477–1480
Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A et al (1992) The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 326: 1240–1245
Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353:1386–1389
Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A et al (1997) Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1165–1171
Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (1992) Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Lancet 340:873–876
Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism (2000) Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 21:1301–1336
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism (2003) Thorax 58:470–483
Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Management of massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 112:e28–32
The urokinase pulmonary embolism trial. A national cooperative study (1973) Circulation 47:II1–108
Tibbutt DA, Davies JA, Anderson JA et al (1974) Comparison by controlled clinical trial of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of life-threatening pulmonay embolism. Br Med J 1:343–347
Marini C, Di Ricco G, Rossi G, Rindi M, Palla R, Giuntini C (1988) Fibrinolytic effects of urokinase and heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. Respiration 54:162–173
Levine M, Hirsh J, Weitz J et al (1990) A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 98:1473–1479
Tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. A collaborative study by the PIOPED Investigators (1990) Chest 97:528–533
Dalla-Volta S, Palla A, Santolicandro A et al (1992) PAIMS 2: alteplase combined with heparin versus heparin in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Plasminogen activator Italian multicenter study 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:520–526
Goldhaber SZ, Haire WD, Feldstein ML et al (1993) Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: randomised trial assessing right-ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion. Lancet 341:507–511
Urokinase-streptokinase embolism trial (1974) Phase 2 results. A cooperative study (1974) JAMA 229:1606–1613
Meyer G, Sors H, Charbonnier B et al (1992) Effects of intravenous urokinase versus alteplase on total pulmonary resistance in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a European multicenter double-blind trial. The European Cooperative Study Group for Pulmonary Embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:239–245
Goldhaber SZ, Kessler CM, Heit J et al (1988) Randomised controlled trial of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Lancet 2:293–298
Meneveau N, Schiele F, Metz D et al (1998) Comparative efficacy of a two-hour regimen of streptokinase versus alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism: immediate clinical and hemodynamic outcome and one-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 31: 1057–1063
Sors H, Pacouret G, Azarian R, Meyer G, Charbonnier B, Simonneau G (1994) Hemodynamic effects of bolus vs 2-h infusion of alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Chest 106:712–717
Verstraete M, Miller GA, Bounameaux H et al (1988) Intravenous and intrapulmonary recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in the treatment of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 77:353–360
Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, Heinrich F, Kasper W (2002) Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 347:1143–1150
Kanter DS, Mikkola KM, Patel SR, Parker JA, Goldhaber SZ (1997) Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and associated risk factors. Chest 111:1241–1245
Goldhaber SZ, Kessler CM, Heit JA et al (1992) Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus a novel dosing regimen of urokinase in acute pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:24–30
Geibel A, Olschewski M, Zehender M, et al (2007) Possible gender-related differences in the risk-to-benefit ratio of thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 99:103–107. Epub 2006 Nov 9
Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ (2006) Massive pulmonary embolism. Circulation 113:577–582. Epub 2006 Jan 23
Wan S, Quinlan DJ, Agnelli G, Eikelboom JW (2004) Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Circulation 110:744–749. Epub 2004 Jul 19
Aklog L, Williams CS, Byrne JG, Goldhaber SZ (2002) Acute pulmonary embolectomy: a contemporary approach. Circulation 105:1416–1419
Augustinos P, Ouriel K (2004) Invasive approaches to treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 110:127–34
Reekers JA, Baarslag HJ, Koolen MG, Van Delden O, van Beek EJ (2003) Mechanical thrombectomy for early treatment of massive pulmonary embolism. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:246–250
Konstantinides S, Tiede N, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H, Kasper W (1998) Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for resolution of major pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 82:966–970
Dalen JE, Banas JS Jr, Brooks HL, Evans GL, Paraskos JA, Dexter L (1969) Resolution rate of acute pulmonary embolism in man. N Engl J Med 280:1194–1199
Kasper W, Geibel A, Tiede N, Hofmann T, Meinertz T, Just H (1989) Echocardiography in the diagnosis of lung embolism. Herz 14:82–101
Goldhaber SZ (2002) Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 136:691–700
Kasper W, Geibel A, Tiede N et al (1993) Distinguishing between acute and subacute massive pulmonary embolism by conventional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 70:352–356
Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Tiede N, Krause T, Just H (1997) Prognostic significance of right ventricular afterload stress detected by echocardiography in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Heart 77:346–349
Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P et al (2000) Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 101:2817–2822
Vieillard-Baron A, Page B, Augarde R et al (2001) Acute cor pulmonale in massive pulmonary embolism: incidence, echocardiographic pattern, clinical implications and recovery rate. Intensive Care Med 27:1481–1486
Ribeiro A, Lindmarker P, Johnsson H, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Jorfeldt L (1999) Pulmonary embolism: one-year follow-up with echocardiography doppler and five-year survival analysis. Circulation 99:1325–1330
Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Arch Intern Med 165: 1777–1781
ten Wolde M, Sohne M, Quak E, Mac Gillavry MR, Buller HR (2004) Prognostic value of echocardiographically assessed right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 164:1685–1689
Janata K, Holzer M, Laggner AN, Mullner M (2003) Cardiac troponin T in the severity assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism: cohort study. BMJ 326:312–313
Pruszczyk P, Bochowicz A, Torbicki A et al (2003) Cardiac troponin T monitoring identifies high-risk group of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 123: 1947–1952
Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M et al (2002) Importance of cardiac troponins I and T in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 106:1263–1268
Giannitsis E, Muller-Bardorff M, Kurowski V et al (2000) Independent prognostic value of cardiac troponin T in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism. Circulation 102:211–217
Bova C, Crocco F, Ricchio R, Serafini O, Greco F, Noto A (2005) Importance of troponin T for the risk stratification of normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism. A prospective, cohort study with a three-month follow-up. Haematologica 90:423–424
La Vecchia L, Ottani F, Favero L et al (2004) Increased cardiac troponin I on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in acute pulmonary embolism. Heart 90:633–637
Yalamanchili K, Sukhija R, Aronow WS, Sinha N, Fleisher AG, Lehrman SG (2004) Prevalence of increased cardiac troponin I levels in patients with and without acute pulmonary embolism and relation of increased cardiac troponin I levels with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 93:263–264
Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 108:2191–2194
Binder L, Pieske B, Olschewski M et al (2005) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or troponin testing followed by echocardiography for risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 112:1573–1579 Epub 2005 Sep 6
Kucher N, Printzen G, Doernhoefer T, Windecker S, Meier B, Hess OM (2003) Low pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels predict benign clinical outcome in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:1576–1578. Epub 2003 Mar 24
Kucher N, Printzen G, Goldhaber SZ (2003) Prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:2545–2547 Epub 2003 May 12
Pruszczyk P, Kostrubiec M, Bochowicz A et al (2003) N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 22:649–653
ten Wolde M, Tulevski, II, Mulder JW et al (2003) Brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism. Circulation 107:2082–2084. Epub 2003 Apr 21
Kruger S, Graf J, Merx MW et al (2004) Brain natriuretic peptide predicts right heart failure in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J 147:60–65
Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M et al (1997) Association between thrombolytic treatment and the prognosis of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. Circulation 96:882–888
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Steinkopff Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geibel, A., Bode, C., Konstantinides, S. (2008). Risikostratifikation und differenzierte Therapiekonzepte auf der Intensivstation bei Patienten mit akuter Lungenembolie. In: Trappe, HJ. (eds) Neues aus Kardiologie und Rhythmologie. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1886-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1886-5_9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Steinkopff
Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1885-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1886-5
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)