Advertisement

The Ross operation: two decades of clinical experience

  • J. F. Matthias Bechtel
  • Hans-H. Sievers
  • T. Hanke
  • U. Stierle
  • A. J. J. J. C. Bogers
  • W. Hemmer
  • J. O. Böhm
  • J. G. Rein
  • C. A. Botha
  • R. Lange
  • J. Hörer
  • A. Moritz
  • T. Wahlers
  • U. F. W. Franke
  • M. Breuer
  • K. Ferrari-Kühne
  • Roland Hetzer
  • M. Hübler
  • G. Ziemer
  • A. W. Gorski
  • J. J. M. Takkenberg
  • M. Misfeld
  • on behalf of the German-Dutch Ross Registry

Abstract

Until today, no perfect valve substitute has been developed. Some essential requirements for a perfect valve substitute are proposed in Table 1. Regarding the aortic valve, the Ross procedure (pulmonary autograft operation) is closer to this ideal than any other substitute in many ways. For this reason, it was enthusiastically adopted by many surgeons after it became widely known in the late 1980s and was technically simplified by Stelzer and Elkins [27] (total root replacment, Fig. 1). In recent years, however, several groups report high reoperation rates and a worrysome tendency for the development of neoaortic regurgitation and/or ascending aortic aneurysms [7, 10, 16, 18, 20, 29]. A recent systematic review concluded that “durability limitations become apparent by the end of the first postoperative decade, in particular in younger patients” [28], and it was asked whether the ross procedure is a “Trojan horse” [15]. As a result of these newer data, many centers appear to have stopped performing the Ross procedure.
Table 1.

Proposed criteria of an ideal valve substitute

Fig. 1.

Schematic drawing of the Ross procedure. The diseased aortic valve is resected (1). Then, the autologous pulmonary root including the valve is harvested from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) (2). The autologous pulmonary valve can be implanted into the aortic position using different techniques

  • Full root replacement: this technique was popularized by Stelzer and Elkins and is the technique most often used worldwide. The autologous pulmonary root is implanted in the aortic position (3). With this technique, reimplantation of the coronary arteries into the neoaortic root is necessary, but the geometry of the pulmonary root can be easily preserved in its new position

  • Subcoronary implantation: this is the technique originally described by Ross and still preferred by the Luebeck group. The autologous pulmonary valve is implanted into the aortic root in a subcoronary position (4)

  • Cylinder inclusion technique: this technique combines features from the other two techniques. It is technically the most demanding and is only rarely used (5)

  • To complete the operation, the defect in the RVOT needs to be reconstructed, usually by implantation of a pulmonary allograft root (6)

Keywords

Aortic Valve Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Ross Procedure Allograft Valve Pulmonary Autograft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baskett RJF, Nanton MA, Warren AE, Ross DB (2003) Human leukocyte antigen-DR and ABO mismatch are associated with accelerated homograft failure in children: Implications for therapeutic interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126: 232–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bechtel JFM, Bartels C, Schmidtke C et al (2001) Anti-HLA class I antibodies and pulmonary homograft function after the Ross-procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 71:2003–2007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bechtel JFM, Bartels C, Schmidtke C et al (2001) Does histocompatibility affect homograft valve function after the Ross-procedure? Circulation 104 [suppl I]:I–25–I–28Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhm JO, Botha CA, Hemmer W et al (2003) Older patients fare better with the Ross operation. Ann Thorac Surg 75:796–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Böhm JO, Botha CA, Rein JG, Roser D (2001) Technical evolution of the Ross operation: midterm results in 186 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 71:S340–S343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brockbank KGM, Lightfoot FG, Song YC, Taylor MJ (2000) Interstitial ice formation in cryopreserved homografts: a possible cause of tissue deterioration and calcification in vivo. J Heart Valve Dis 9:200–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Fukui T, Rodefeld MD, Mahomed Y, Turrentine MW (2006) Fate of the autograft and homograft following Ross aortic valve replacement: reoperative frequency, outcome, and management. J Heart Valve Dis 15:253–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrel T, Schwerzmann M, Eckstein F, Aymard T, Kadner A (2008) Preliminary results following reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilatation after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:472–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chambers JC, Somerville J, Stone S, Ross DN (1997) Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series. Circulation 96:2206–2214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Kerchove L, Rubay J, Pasquet A et al (2009) Ross operation in the adult: long-term outcomes after root replacement and inclusion techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 87:95–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dignan R, O’Brien M, Hogan P et al (2003) Aortic valve allograft structural deterioration is associated with a subset of antibodies to Human Leucocyte Antigens. J Heart Valve Dis 12:382–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dignan R, O’Brien M, Hogan P et al (2000) Influence of HLA matching and associated factors on aortic valve homograft function. J Heart Valve Dis 9:504–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hanke T, Stierle U, Boehm JO et al (2007) Autograft regurgitation and aortic root dimensions after the Ross procedure: the German Ross Registry experience. Circulation 116 [Suppl I]:1251–1258Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoekstra F, Knoop C, Vaessen L et al (1996) Donor-specific cellular immune response against human cardiac valve allografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:281–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klieverik LM, Takkenberg JJ, Bekkers JA, Roos-Hesselink JW, Witsenburg M, Bogers AJ (2007) The Ross operation: a Trojan horse? Eur Heart J 28:1993–2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kouchoukos NT, Masetti P, Nickerson NJ, Castner CF, Shannon WD, Dávila-Román VG (2004) The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 78:773–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Legare JF, Lee TDG, Ross DB (2000) Cryopreservation of rat aortic valves results in increased structural failure. Circulation 102 [suppl III]:III75–III78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luciani GB, Favaro A, Casali G, Santini F, Mazzucco A (2005) Reoperations for aortic aneurysm after the Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 14:766–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nishizawa Y, Saeki K, Hirai H, Yazaki Y, Takaku F, Yuo A (1998) Potent inhibition of cell density-dependent apoptosis and enhancement of survival by dimethyl sulf-oxide in human myeloblastic HL-60 cells. J Cell Physiol 174:135–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pasquali SK, Cohen MS, Shera D, Wernovsky G, Spray TL, Marino BS (2007) The relationship between neo-aortic root dilation, insufficiency, and reintervention following the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1806–1812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pompilio G, Polvani G, Piccolo G et al (2004) Six-year monitoring of the donor-specific immune response to cryopreserved aortic allograft valves: implications with valve dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 78:557–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ross DN (1967) Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 2:956–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidtke C, Bechtel JFM, Noetzold A, Sievers HH (2000) Up to seven years of experience with the Ross procedure in patients >60 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1173–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shaddy RE, Lambert LM, Fuller TC et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial of azathioprine in cryopreserved valved allografts in children. Ann Thorac Surg 71:43–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sievers HH, Hanke T, Stierle U et al (2006) A Critical Reappraisal of the Ross Operation. Renaissance of the subcoronary implantation technique? Circulation 114 [suppl I]:1504–1511Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith JD, Ogino H, Hunt D, Laylor RM, Rose ML, Yacoub MH (1995) Humoral immune response to human aortic valve homografts. Ann Thorac Surg 60:S127–S130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stelzer P, Jones DJ, Elkins RC (1989) Aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft. Circulation 80 [Suppl III]:III209–III213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takkenberg JJ, Klieverik LM, Schoof PH et al (2009) The Ross procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 119:222–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takkenberg JJ, van Herweden LA, Galema TW et al (2006) Serial echocardiographic assessment of neo-aortic regurgitation and root dimensions after the modified Ross-procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 15:100–106 (discussion 106–107)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tominaga T, Kitagawa T, Masuda Y et al (2000) Viability of cryopreserved semilunar valves: An evaluation of cytosolic and mitochondrial activities. Ann Thorac Surg 70:792–795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yap CH, Skillington PD, Matalanis G et al (2008) Human leukocyte antigen mismatch and other factors affecting cryopreserved allograft valve function. Heart Surg Forum 11:E42–E45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Matthias Bechtel
    • 1
  • Hans-H. Sievers
    • 1
  • T. Hanke
  • U. Stierle
  • A. J. J. J. C. Bogers
  • W. Hemmer
  • J. O. Böhm
  • J. G. Rein
  • C. A. Botha
  • R. Lange
  • J. Hörer
  • A. Moritz
  • T. Wahlers
  • U. F. W. Franke
  • M. Breuer
  • K. Ferrari-Kühne
  • Roland Hetzer
    • 2
  • M. Hübler
  • G. Ziemer
  • A. W. Gorski
  • J. J. M. Takkenberg
    • 3
  • M. Misfeld
  • on behalf of the German-Dutch Ross Registry
  1. 1.Klinik für ChirurgieUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus LübeckLübeckGermany
  2. 2.Deutsches Herzzentrum BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Dept of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Bd563Erasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations