Advertisement

Effects of valve repair on long-term patient outcomes after mitral valve surgery

  • M.A. Daneshmand
  • J.G. Gaca
  • J.S. Rankin
  • C.A. Milano
  • D.D. Glower
  • W.G. Wolfe
  • P.K. Smith

Abstract

Over the past decade, techniques for mitral valve repair have expanded considerably, so that most mitral pathologies now can be repaired routinely. A question still exists, however, whether patients would benefit from more liberal application of repair, and if so, in what disease categories and clinical situations. One way to address this problem, or at least to gain insights, would be to review experiences with previous patient cohorts. Faced with this question 5 years ago, the authors began a systematic analysis of mitral surgery patients receiving care at Duke University over the past 20 years. Because all surgical patients had been entered into a prospective databank over that time, the opportunity existed to examine long-term outcomes, using multivariable analysis methodology. The purpose of this paper is to review those studies, with the goal of summarizing the benefits of mitral valve repair on patient outcomes observed in our clinical experience.

Keywords

Mitral Valve Valve Replacement Mitral Valve Replacement Mitral Valve Repair Mitral Valve Surgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rankin JS, Alfery DD, Orozcoa R, et al. (2008) Techniques of artificial chordal replacement for mitral valve repair: use in multiple pathologic disorders. Operat Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rankin JS (2009) Artificial chordal replacement in complex mitral valve repair, at CTSNet: http://www.ctsnet.org/sections/clinicalresources/videos/vg2009_rankin_ACRinComplexMVR.html
  3. 3.
    Rankin JS, Burrichter CA, Walton-Shirley MK, et al. (2009) Trends in mitral valve surgery: a single practice experience. J Heart Valve Dis 18:359–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daneshmand MA, Milano CA, Rankin JS, et al. (2010) Influence of patient age on procedural selection in mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90:1479–1486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackstone EH (2002) Comparing apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cox D (1972) Regression model and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–220Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glower D, Tuttle R, Shaw L, et al. (2005) Patient survival characteristics after routine mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:860–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milano CA, Daneshmand MA, Rankin JS, et al. (2008) Survival prognosis and surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 86:735–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daneshmand MA, Milano CA, Rankin JS, et al. (2009) Mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: a 20-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 88:1828–1837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.A. Daneshmand
    • 1
  • J.G. Gaca
    • 1
  • J.S. Rankin
    • 2
  • C.A. Milano
    • 1
  • D.D. Glower
    • 1
  • W.G. Wolfe
    • 1
  • P.K. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cardiac SurgeryVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations