Differences and Opportunities of THA in the USA, Asia and Europe

  • Hartmuth Kiefer
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


There are several differences for total hip arthroplasty in USA, Asia and Europe. Primary osteoarthritis is the mean indication for hip replacement in Europe and USA, while in Asia secondary osteoarthritis encounters for most hip diseases and elective THA. Different needs for implant sizes have been solved for Asian countries since many developments of the 90s respected the needs for smaller patients and different bone morphology. However, the challenges with younger patients and an increased number of revision surgeries are the same for all orthopaedic surgeons. Consequent result documentation as it is in European hip registers in Scandinavia, is not yet established in other countries. Differences in implant selection and surgeon’s preference are still obvious and influenced by education and experience. Different approval processes and the economic environment influence the availability of new implants or material and technology developments.


Direct Anterior Approach Periprosthetic Bone Remodel Supine Patient Position Ceramic Modular Head 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86-A(5):963–974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanfilippo JA, Austin MS. Implants for total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 Nov;3(6):769–776.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenberg AG. Fixation for the millennium: the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17 (4 Suppl 1):3–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Effenberger H, Imhof M, Richolt J, Rehart S. [Cement-free hip cups. Current status] [Article in German] Orthopade. 2004 Jun;33(6):733–750; quiz 751.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Effenberger H, Imhof M, Witzel U, Rehart S. [Cementless stems of the hip. Current status] [Article in German] Orthopade. 2005 May;34(5):477–500.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, Sangl J, Bright RA. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89(3):526–533.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, Phillips CB, Mahomed NN, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Nov;83-A(11): 1622–1629.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4): 780–785.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmuth Kiefer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryLukas HospitalBuendeGermany

Personalised recommendations