Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hypersensitive Haut

  • Chapter
Dermatokosmetik

  • 3256 Accesses

Auszug

Empfindliche bzw. hypersensitive Haut ist keine Entität, sondern ein Symptom mit diversen endogenen oder exogenen Ursachen und stellt heute ein beachtliches dermatologisches Problem der Gesellschaft dar. So stuften in einer britischen Studie mehr als die Hälfte aller befragten Frauen und nahezu 40% der Männer ihre Haut als empfindlich ein, 10% der Frauen und etwa 6% der Männer beurteilten ihre Haut sogar als sehr empfindlich [44]. 23% der Frauen und etwa 14% der Männer gaben an, eine Überempfindlichkeitsreaktion auf ein persönliches Pflegeprodukt innerhalb der letzten 12 Monate vor Durchführung der Umfrage gehabt zu haben [44]. Ergebnisse einer eigenen Untersuchung an Probandinnen ergaben das Vorliegen eines empfindlichen Hautzustandes bei 44% [45]. Die Inzidenz empfindlicher Haut scheint auch in Amerika nicht niedriger zu sein als in Europa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adams RM, Maibach HI (1985) A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:1062–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agner T, Serup J (1989) Quantification of the DMSO-response — a test for assessment of sensitive skin. Clin Exp Dermatol 14:214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin S, Engasser P, Maibach HI (1998) Sensitive skin: What is it? In: Baran R, Maibach HI (eds) Textbook of Cosmetic Dermatology (2nd edn). Martin Dunitz, London, pp 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA (1993) A study of the relationship between susceptibility to skin stinging and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 29:185–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, Wilhelm KP, McFadden J (1996) Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 35:208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basketter D, Reynolds F, Rowson M, Talbot C, Whittle E (1997) Visual assessment of human skin irritation: a sensitive and reproducible tool. Contact Dermatitis 37:218–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Basketter DA, Gilpin G, Kuhn M, Lawrence D, Reynolds F, Whittle E (1998) Patch tests versus use tests in skin irritation risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 39:252–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumann L (2002) Cosmetic Dermatology — Principles and Practice. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benfeldt E, Serup J (1999) Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous penetration of salicylic acid in hairless rats: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function. Arch Dermatol Res 291:517–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1991) Sensitive and ethnic skin. A need for special skin-care agents? Dermatol Clin 9:89–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cotterill JA (1981) Dermatological non-disease: a common and potentially fatal disturbance of cutaneous body image. Br J Dermatol 104:611–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotterill JA (1983) Clinical features of patients with dermatological non-disease. Semin Dermatol 2:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Lacharriere O, Jourdain R, Bastien P, Garrigue JL (2001) Sensitive skin is not a subclinical expression of contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 44:131–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Draelos ZD (1997) Sensitive skin: perceptions, evaluation, and treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 8:67–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Draelos ZD (2000) Treating the patient with multiple cosmetic product allergies. A problemoriented approach to sensitive skin. Postgrad Med 107:70–72, 75–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Effendy I, Weltfriend S, Patil S, Maibach HI (1996) Differential irritant skin responses to topical retinoic acid and sodium lauryl sulphate: alone and in crossover design. Br J Dermatol 134:424–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Faller C, Bracher M, Dami N, Roguet R (2002) Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics. Toxicol In Vitro 16:557–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher A (1980) Cosmetic actions and reactions: therapeutic, irritant and allergic. Cutis 26:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Foy V, Weinkauf R, Whittle E, Basketter DA (2001) Ethnic variation in the skin irritation response. Contact Dermatitis 45:346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Francomano M, Bertoni L, Seidenari S (2000) Sensitive skin as subclinical expression of contact allergy to nickel sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 42:169–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (1977) A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goffin V, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE (1996) Sensitive skin and stratum corneum reactivity to household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis 34:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Issachar N, Gall Y, Borell MT, Poelman MC (1997) pH measurements during lactic acid stinging test in normal and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 36:152–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, Poelman MC (1998) Correlation between percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate and sensitive skin, using laser Doppler imaging. Contact Dermatitis 39:182–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jourdain R, Lacharriere O, Bastien P, Maibach HI (2002) Ethnic variations in self-perceived sensitive skin: epidemiological survey. Contact Dermatitis 46:162–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jourdain R, Bastien P, Lacharrière O, Rubinstenn G (2005) Detection thresholds of capsaicin: a new test to assess facial skin neurosensitivity. J Cosmet Sci 56:153–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann P, Neumann NJ (2000) Photodermatosen. Ein Leitfaden zur Diagnostik. Steinkopff, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maibach HI (1987) The cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Ear, Nose, Throat J 66:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maibach HI, Lammintausta K, Berardesca E, Freeman S (1989) Tendency to irritation: sensitive skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:833–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, Cooper K, Rowson M, Basketter DA (2005) The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 53:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mills OH Jr, Berger RS (1991) Defining the susceptibility of acne-prone and sensitive skin populations to extrinsic factors. Dermatol Clin 9:93–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morren M, Dooms-Goosens A, Heidbuchel M, Sente F, Damas MC (1991) Contact allergy to dihydroacetone. Contact Dermatitis 25:326–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH (1998) Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 9:170–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pierard GE, Arrese JE, Rodriguez C, Daskaleros PA (1994) Effects of softened and unsoftened fabrics on sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 30:286–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Plewig G, Jansen T, Schürer NY (1997) Das Stratum corneum. Hautarzt 48:510–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reilly DM, Parslew R, Sharpe GR, Powell S, Green M (2000) Inflammatory mediators in normal, sensitive and diseased skin types. Acta Derm Venereol 80:171–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Richard A, Rougier A (2002) A test battery to insure the safety of topical products especially designed for sensitive skin: application for the development of a daily cream. Eur J Dermatol 12:LIV–LV

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rietschel R, Fowler J (eds) (2001) Fisher’s contact dermatitis (5th edn). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson MK (2002) Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis 46:86–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Roussake-Schulze AV, Zafiriou E, Nikoulis D, Klimi E, Rallis E, Zintzaras E (2005) Objective biophysical findings in patients with sensitive skin. Drugs Exp Clin Res 31 (Suppl):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ruëff F (2000) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis. In: Braun-Falco O, Gloor M, Korting HC (Hrsg) Nutzen und Risiko von Kosmetika. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 90–99

    Google Scholar 

  42. Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L (1998) Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 38:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Vie K, Pons-Guiraud A, Dupuy P, Maibach H (2000) Tolerance profile of a sterile moisturizer and moisturizing cleanser in irritated and sensitive skin. Am J Contact Dermat 11:161–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. West I, Maibach HI (1995) Contact urticaria syndrome from multiple cosmetic components. Contact Dermatitis 32:121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharriere O, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdain R, Bastien P, Wilkinson JD (2001) Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 145:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Williams S, Krueger N, Kescharwazi M, Sievers E, Bayrhammer J, Kraus D, Hall I, Reuther T, Kerscher M (2005) Prävalenz „fettiger“, „trockener“, „normaler“ und „empfindlicher“ Haut in Deutschland. JDDG 3:161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wolf R (1994) Has mildness replaced cleanliness next to godliness? Dermatology 189:217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhai H, Hannon W, Hahn GS, Pelosi A, Harper RA, Maibach HI (2000) Strontium nitrate suppresses chemically induced sensory irritation in humans. Contact Dermatitis 42:98–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Steinkopff Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Hypersensitive Haut. In: Dermatokosmetik. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1739-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1739-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1546-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1739-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation