Skip to main content

Anastomotic engineering bei femorosupragenualen Bypässen — Erste Ergebnisse mit der Dynaflo™-Prothese

  • Chapter
Läsionen der Becken- und Oberschenkelarterien

Part of the book series: Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe ((BERLINGEFÄß,volume 9))

  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

Introduction: Due to anastomotic engineering, the Dynaflo™ prosthetic graft, like the Distaflo®prosthesis, offers a precuffed distal anastomotic site similar to the Miller cuff aiming at optimized hemodynamics within the distal termino-lateral anastomosis particularly for femoropopliteal supragenual bypasses. Graft thrombosis and subendothelial myointimal hyperplasia may thus be reduced. The aim of the present study is to obtain the first clinical results with this new prosthetic graft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Alcocer F, Jordan WD Jr, Wirthlin DJ, Whitley D (2004) Early results of lower extremity infrageniculate revascularization with a new polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Vascular 12:318–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballotta E, Renon L, Toffano M, Da Giau G (2003) Prospective randomized study on bilateral above-knee femoropopliteal revascularization: Polytetrafluoroethylene graft versus reversed saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 38:1051–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berglund J, Bjorck M, Elfstrom J, SWEDVASC Femoro-popliteal Study Group (2005) Long-term results of above knee femoro-popliteal bypass depend on indication for surgery and graft-material. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:412–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Verbist J, Schroe H, Lauwers G, Lansink W, Peeters P (2006) Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft for femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypass grafting: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg 43:313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan LA, Enzler MA, da Silva A, How TV, Harris PL (1996) New graft design to inhibit myointimal hyperplasia in small vessel anastomoses. Br J Surg 83:1383–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burger DHC, Kappetein AP, van Bockel JH, Breslau PJ (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing vein with polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 32:278–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch M, Meinhart J, Fischlein T, Preiss P, Zilla P (1999) Clinical autologo us in vitro endothelialization of infrainguinal ePTFE grafts in 100 patients: a 9-year experience. Surgery 126:847–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Faries PL, LoGerfo FW, Arora S, Hook S, Pulling MC, Akbari CM, Campbell DR, Pomposelli FB Jr (2000) A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: all-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg 32: 1080–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher RK, How TV, Carpenter T, Brennan JA, Harris PL (2001) Optimising Miller cuff dimensions. The influence of geometry on anastomotic flow patterns. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:251–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher RK, How TV, Toonder IM, Hoedt MTC, Brennan JA, Gilling-Smith GL, Harris PL (2001) Harnessing haemodynamic forces for the suppression of anstomotic intimai hyperplasia: the rationale for precuffed grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21: 520–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher RK, Kirkpatrick UJ, How TV, Brennan JA, Gilling-Smith GL, Harris PL (2003) The Distaflo graft: a valid alternative to interposition vein? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 25:235–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths GD, Nagy J, Black D, Stonebridge DA, on behalf of the Joint Vascular Research Group (2004) Randomized clinical trial of distal anastomotic interposition vein cuff in infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting. Br J Surg 91:560–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heise M, Krüger U, Rückert RI, Rad F, Scholz H, Neuhaus P, Settmacher U (2003) Correlation between angiographie runoff and intraoperative hydraulic impedance with regard to graft patency. Ann Vasc Surg 17:509–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansen KH, Watson, JC (2004) Dacron femoral-popliteal bypass grafts in good-risk claudicant patients. Am J Surg 187:580–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klinkert P, Post PN, Breslau PJ, van Bockel JH (2004) Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:357–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mills JL Sr (2000) P values may lack power: The choice of conduit for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 32:402–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Panneton JM, Hollier LH, Hofer JM, and the Distaflo Trial Investigators (2004) Multicenter randomized prospective trial comparing a pre-cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene graft to a vein cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene graft for infragenicular arterial bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 18:199–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Post S, Kraus T, Müller-Reinartz U, Weiss C, Kortmann H, Quentmeier A, Winkler M, Husfeldt KJ, Allenberg JR (2001) Dacron vs. polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomised multicentre trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:226–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rückert RI, Settmacher U, Krüger U, Scholz H (2000) Femorodistal PTFE bypass grafting for severe limb ischaemia: results of a prospective clinical study using a new distal anastomotic technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 20:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tilanus HW, Obertop H, van Urk H (1985) Saphenous vein or PTFE for femoro-popliteal bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 202:780–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, White-Flores S, Samson RH, Scher LA, Towne JB, Bernhard VM, Bonier P, Flinn WR, et al (1986) Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wijeshinghe LD, Mahmood T, Scott DJA (1999) Axial flow fields in cuffed end-to-side anastomoses: Effect of angle and disease progression. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 18: 240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Steinkopff Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsilimparis, N. et al. (2008). Anastomotic engineering bei femorosupragenualen Bypässen — Erste Ergebnisse mit der Dynaflo™-Prothese. In: Gussmann, A., RÜckert, R.I. (eds) Läsionen der Becken- und Oberschenkelarterien. Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe, vol 9. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1717-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1717-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1716-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1717-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics