Sutureless anastomotic devices for vascular surgery
Over the past ten years, vascular surgeons have witnessed very few changes in their domain, with the exception of the endovascular treatment of some vascular diseases, probably because they are traditionally conservative adopters of new technologies. However, they are now more receptive than ever to any new devices and procedures that can potentially facilitate their everyday work and increase patients’ benefits. The introduction of minimally invasive techniques for major vascular reconstructions is a potential solution that could both save the vascular surgeon’s core activity and reduce patient trauma. In this context, the medical industry can consistently help the surgeon in dealing with vascular reconstructions that are more and more complex due to the aging population and the increasing number of patients’ comorbidity. Performing standard suture techniques for vascular anastomosis construction by endoscopic means, requires tremendous surgical ability, has a very long learning curb and it is a time consuming procedure. Furthermore, it is a matter of fact that when the surgical procedure becomes very technically demanding the surgical risk increases as well. Therefore, to make the endoscopic approach widely accepted, surgeons need an alternative way to construct vascular bypass in order to reduce the technical demand and speed up the procedure. It is mandatory that the clinical outcome remain the same if not improve.
KeywordsPatency Rate Vascular Reconstruction Vascular Anastomosis PTFE Graft Vascular Join
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Zhu YH, Kirsch WM, Cushman R et al. (1985) Comparison of suture and clip for microvascular anastomoses. Surg Forum 36:492–495Google Scholar
- 3.Zhu YH, Steckel R, Kirsch WM (1994) Comparative evaluation of suture and nonpenetrating metal clips for vascular reconstruction. Surg Forum 45:593–597Google Scholar
- 4.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Gaskill D et al. (1992) Tissue reconstruction with nonpenetrating arcuate-legged clips: potential endoscopic applications. J Repr Med 37:581–586Google Scholar
- 6.Zhu YH, Kirsch WM (1992) A new surgical technique for venous reconstruction: the nonpenetrating clip. In: Chang JB (ed) Modern vascular surgery, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 425–463Google Scholar
- 7.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z, Cushman R (1993) Instrumentation. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 63–71Google Scholar
- 8.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z, Hardesty RA (1993) Microvascular anastomoses: surgical technique. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 73–78Google Scholar
- 9.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) Morphologic events during healing of microvascular anastomoses. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 79–88Google Scholar
- 10.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Hardesty RA et al. (1993) The non-penetrating arcuate-legged clip: clinical applications. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 89–101Google Scholar
- 11.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) The anastomoses of small arteries and veins by clips: a description of instruments. In: Wang Z-G (ed) Vascular surgery. International Academic Publishers, Beijing, pp 41–46Google Scholar
- 12.Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) Microvenous anastomoses and arterial grafting: comparison of clip suture. In: Wang Z-G (ed) Vascular surgery. International Academic Publishers, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hammond SJ, Kirsch WM, Wahlstrom PGE et al. (1995) A multi-centered controlled clinical trial comparing clips to suture for construction of vascular access sites for hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Surg 3(1):136Google Scholar
- 15.Schild AF (1997) Use of a vascular staple device for creation of AV fistulas and bridge grafts for hemodialysis. In: Henry ML, Ferguson RM (eds) Vascular access for hemodialysis-V. WL Gore & Assoc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 95–102Google Scholar