Sutureless anastomotic devices for vascular surgery


Over the past ten years, vascular surgeons have witnessed very few changes in their domain, with the exception of the endovascular treatment of some vascular diseases, probably because they are traditionally conservative adopters of new technologies. However, they are now more receptive than ever to any new devices and procedures that can potentially facilitate their everyday work and increase patients’ benefits. The introduction of minimally invasive techniques for major vascular reconstructions is a potential solution that could both save the vascular surgeon’s core activity and reduce patient trauma. In this context, the medical industry can consistently help the surgeon in dealing with vascular reconstructions that are more and more complex due to the aging population and the increasing number of patients’ comorbidity. Performing standard suture techniques for vascular anastomosis construction by endoscopic means, requires tremendous surgical ability, has a very long learning curb and it is a time consuming procedure. Furthermore, it is a matter of fact that when the surgical procedure becomes very technically demanding the surgical risk increases as well. Therefore, to make the endoscopic approach widely accepted, surgeons need an alternative way to construct vascular bypass in order to reduce the technical demand and speed up the procedure. It is mandatory that the clinical outcome remain the same if not improve.


Patency Rate Vascular Reconstruction Vascular Anastomosis PTFE Graft Vascular Join 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zhu YH, Kirsch WM, Cushman R et al. (1985) Comparison of suture and clip for microvascular anastomoses. Surg Forum 36:492–495Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Hardesty RA et al. (1993) Nonpenetrating clips successfully replacing sutures in base of skull surgery. Skull Base Surg 3:171–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu YH, Steckel R, Kirsch WM (1994) Comparative evaluation of suture and nonpenetrating metal clips for vascular reconstruction. Surg Forum 45:593–597Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Gaskill D et al. (1992) Tissue reconstruction with nonpenetrating arcuate-legged clips: potential endoscopic applications. J Repr Med 37:581–586Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Hardesty RA, Chapolini R (1992) A new method for microvascular anastomosis: report of experimental and clinical research. Am Surg 58:722–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu YH, Kirsch WM (1992) A new surgical technique for venous reconstruction: the nonpenetrating clip. In: Chang JB (ed) Modern vascular surgery, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 425–463Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z, Cushman R (1993) Instrumentation. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z, Hardesty RA (1993) Microvascular anastomoses: surgical technique. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 73–78Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) Morphologic events during healing of microvascular anastomoses. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 79–88Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Hardesty RA et al. (1993) The non-penetrating arcuate-legged clip: clinical applications. In: Lee S (ed) Color atlas of microsurgery. IEA Publishers, St. Louis, pp 89–101Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) The anastomoses of small arteries and veins by clips: a description of instruments. In: Wang Z-G (ed) Vascular surgery. International Academic Publishers, Beijing, pp 41–46Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirsch WM, Zhu YH, Boukouvalas Z et al. (1993) Microvenous anastomoses and arterial grafting: comparison of clip suture. In: Wang Z-G (ed) Vascular surgery. International Academic Publishers, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeebregts CJ, Kirsch WM, van den Dungen JJ, Zhu YH, van Schilfgaarde R (2004) Five years’ world experience with nonpenetrating clips for vascular anastomoses. Am J Surg 187(6):751–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hammond SJ, Kirsch WM, Wahlstrom PGE et al. (1995) A multi-centered controlled clinical trial comparing clips to suture for construction of vascular access sites for hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Surg 3(1):136Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schild AF (1997) Use of a vascular staple device for creation of AV fistulas and bridge grafts for hemodialysis. In: Henry ML, Ferguson RM (eds) Vascular access for hemodialysis-V. WL Gore & Assoc and Precept Press, Chicago, pp 95–102Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerbault O, Arrouvel C, Servant J-M (1998) Anastomoses par microagrafes VCS sur des vaisseaux de diamètre inférieur á 2 millimètres: étude expérimentale préliminaire chez le rat. Ann Chir Plast Esthét 43:27–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akita M, Takenaka H, Harada M (2002) Can nonpenetrating vascular closure staples and hepatocyte growth factor prevent intimal hyperplasia following ePTFE grafting of the carotid artery in rabbits. Surg Today 32:618–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leppäniemi A, Wherry D, Pikoulis E (1997) Arterial and venous repair with vascular clips: comparison with suture closure. J Vasc Surg 26:24–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeebregts C, van den Dungen J, Buikema H (2001) Preservation of endothelial integrity and function in experimental vascular anastomosis with non-penetrating clips. Br J Surg 88:1201–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Komori K, Shoji T, Furuyama T (2001) Non-penetrating vascular clips anastomosis inhibited intimal thickening under poor runoff conditions in canine autogenous vein grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baguneid MS, Goldner S, Fulford PE (2001) A comparison of para-anastomotic compliance profiles after vascular anastomosis: nonpenetrating clips versus standard sutures. J Vasc Surg 33:812–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zeebregts C, Acosta R, Bölander L (2002) Clinical experience with nonpenetrating vascular clips in free flap reconstructions. Br J Plast Surg 55:105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papalois VE, Romagnoli J, Hakim NS (1998) Use of vascular closure staples in vascular access for dialysis, kidney and pancreas transplantation. Int Surg 83:177–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cook JW, Schuman ES, Standage BA, Heinl P (2001) Patency and flow characteristics using stapled vascular anastomoses in dialysis grafts. Am J Surg 181:24–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cooper BZ, Flores L, Ramirez JA (2001) Analysis of nonpenetrating clips versus sutures for arterial venous graft anastomosis. Ann Vasc Surg 15:7–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones JW (1998) A new anastomotic technique in renal transplants reduces warm ischemia time. Clin Transplant 12:70–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirsch WM, Cavallo C, Anton T (2001) An alternative system for cerebrovascular reconstructions: non-penetrating arcuate-legged clips. Cardiovasc Surg 9:531–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aarnio P, Järvinen O, Varjo P (2000) Vascular clips in anastomoses of femoropopliteal arterial reconstruction. Int J Angiol 9:62–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nataf P, Hinchliffeb P, Manzo S, Simpson J, Kirsch WM, Yong Hua Zhu, Anton Th (1998) Facilitated vascular anastomoses: the one-shot device. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1041–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nataf P, Kirsch WM, Hill A et al. (1997) Nonpenetrating clips for coronary anastomoses: initial clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 63:S135–S137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2007

Personalised recommendations