Advertisement

Hip Resurfacing — a superior articulation concept?

  • R. M. Streicher
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)

Keywords

Wear Rate Surface Replacement Articular Surface Replacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Semlitsch MF, Streicher RM, Weber H (1989), Verschleissverhalten von Pfannen und Kugeln aus CoCrMo-Gusslegierung bei langzeitig implantierten Ganzmetall-Hüftprothesen. Orthopäde 18: 36–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coleman RF, Herrington UJ, Scales IT (1973) Concentration of wear products in hair, blood and urine after total hip replacement. Br Med J 1: 527–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Revell PA (1982) Tissue reactions to joint prostheses and the product of wear and corrosion. In: Berry CL (ed) Bone and Joint Disease. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–101.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Saadatzadeh MR, Ingham E, Stone MH, Farrar R, Fisher J (2001) Quantative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. Bio-Med Mat Eng 11: 143–157.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walter L, Lee TS (2002) Serum Cr and Co levels with Birmingham Resurfacing Hip replacement. Abstracts XXII SICOT/SIROT World Congress.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMinn D (2002) Biological aspects of Hip Resurfacing. Transactions Engineers & Surgeons — Joined at the Hip Vol 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanisch U, Neumeister V, Witzleb WC (2002) Histopathological findings and metal ion concentrations in MetaSUL and Birmingham Hip Resuracing metal-on-metal bearings. Transactions Engineers & Surgeons — Joined at the Hip Vol 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke MT, Lee PTH, Villar RN (2003) Levels of metal ions after small-and large-diameter metal-on-metal arthroplasty. J Bone joint Surg 85-B(6): 913–917.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heisel C, Silva M, Skipor AK, Jacobs JJ, Schmalzried TP (2005) The relationship between activity and ions in patients with metal-metal bearing hip prosthesis.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moroni A, Savarino L, Cadossi M, Greco M, Baldini N, Giannini S (2006) ion release from MoM hip resurfacing does not differ from standard MoM hip replacement. Transaction 52nd ORS: 0514.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antoniou J, Petit A, Mwale F, Zukor DJ, Huk OL (2006) Metal ion concentration in blood of patients with articular surface replacements: a comparison with MoM hip prostheses. Transaction 52nd ORS: 0507.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cleland D, Leung F (2003) Metal-on-metal versus PE in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orth Rel Res 406: 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Anderson S, Reddy A, Jacobs JJ (2005) Metal sensitivity responses are not MHC II restricted, a new paradigm for metal-induced lymphocyte activityGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park Y-S, Monn Y-W, Lim S-J, Yang J-M, Ahn G, Choi Y-L (2005) Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A(7): 1515–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg 87-A(1): 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Streicher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations