Seven years of experience in MoM resurfacing: Results and open questions

  • M. Menge
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


Femoral Neck Femoral Head Femoral Neck Fracture Early Fracture Bone Density Test 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Back DL, R Dalziel, D Young, et al. (2005) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study on the first 230 hips. JBJS 87-B, 324–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dalton PA, R Nelson, S Krickler (2005) Up to 10-year results of hip resurfacing. Presented at the British Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress. Sept. 20–23, 2005. Birmingham.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniel J, PB Pynsent, DJW McMinn (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. JBJS 86-B, 177–84.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies, AP, HG Willert, PA Campbell, ID Learmonth, CP Case (2005) An Unusual Lymphocytic Perivascular Infiltration in Tissues Around Contemporary Metal-on-Metal Joint Replacements. JBJS 87-A, 18–27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graves S, D Davidson, L Ingerson, et al. (2005) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA ( Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herberts P, H Malchau, G Garrelick (2004) Annual Report. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howie DW, H Bhinda, M McGee (2006) Why Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty: An Australian Perspective. AAOS 2006 Annual Meeting Proceedings, 67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lachiewicz PF: Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Time to consider it again? No (2006) AAOS Annual Meeting Proceedings, 77.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMinn D, J Daniel, C Pradhan, et al. (2006) Transplacental Transfer of Cobalt and Chrome in Patients with Metal-on-Metal Bearings. AAOS Annual Meeting Proceedings, 484.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menge M (2004) Metal-on-Metal in Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Risks or Benefits? In: JY Lazennec, M Dietrich (ed.): Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. 9th Biolox Symposium, Proceedings. Steinkopff, 111–117.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menge M (2005) Oberflöchenersatz am Hüftgelenk — 6-Jahres-Erfahrungen mit der dritten Generation. Z. Orthop. 143, 377–81, 2005, ( Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schramm M, RP Pitto (2000) Clinical Relevance of Allergological Tests in Total Joint Replacement. In: G Willmann, K Zweymüller, (Hrsg.): Bioceramics in Hip Joint Replacement. Thieme, 101–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steffen RT, SR Smith, HS Gill et al (2005) Blood flow in the femoral head during metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Presented at the British Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress. Sept. 20–23, 2005, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schreiber A, HAC Jacob (1984) Loosening of the femoral component of the ICLH double cup hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop. Scand. 207, 55.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tharani R, FJ Dorey, TP Schmalzried (2001) The Risk of Cancer Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty. JBJS 83-A, 2001, 774–80.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas, P (2000) Allergological Aspects of Implant Biology. In: G Willmann, K Zweymüller (Hrsg.): Bioceramics in Hip Joint Replacement. Thieme, 117–21.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Treacy R: Hip Resurfacing — The UK-Experience. AAOS Annual Meeting Proceedings, 66, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Visuri T, et al. (1996) Cancer Risk After Metal on Metal and Polyethylene on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 329, 280–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Witzleb W-C, A Knecht, T Beichler, T Köhler, KP Günther (2004) Hüftgelenk-Oberflöchenersatzendoprothesen. Orthopäde, 1236–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Menge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations