Skip to main content

Comparison of polythene liners with alumina liners in hydroxyapatite hip arthroplasty

  • Conference paper
Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty

Part of the book series: Ceramics in Orthopaedics ((CIO))

  • 817 Accesses

Conclusion

Alumina/alumina bearings will give good service for a long time and that they should be used for patients with a life expectancy of more than 20 years. With further follow-up it may become evident that more ceramic/polythene couples are failing in which case the threshold for routinely using ceramic/ceramic couples may be changed to patients with a life expectancy of 25 years or more. Alumina on polythene will ultimately wear out but, if the patient’s life expectancy is limited, use of this couple would be justified on grounds of easier surgery and cost.

There is a small risk of fracture with alumina/alumina which has to be balanced against a much greater risk of progressive wear in the ceramic/polythene couple. The newer Biolox Delta material should further reduce the incidence of ceramic component failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradley JG, Andrews CM. Furlong calcium Hydroxyapatite coated cementless prosthesis versus Charnley cemented prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81-B;(Suppl):9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buchanan JM. Ceramic on Ceramic Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Key Engineering Materials. Vols. 240–242 (2003);) pp. 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchanan JM,. Key Engineering Materials. Vols. 309–311 (May 2006) pp. 1341–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan JM, Malcolm AJ. 15 Year Review of Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Coated Hip Implants; a Clinical and Histological Evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004: 86-B: SUPP 111.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979:246.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devane PA, Robinson EJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH Nayak NN, Horne JG Measurement in Polyethylene Wear in Acetabular Components Inserted with and without Cement. A randomised trial.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher J, Ingham E, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Barbour PSM, Besong AA, Tipper JL, Matthews JB, Firkins PJ, Nevelos AB, Nevelos JE. Wear and Debris Generation in Artificial Hip Joints: 78–81 in: Sedel L, Willman G (ed) Reliability and Long-term Results of Ceramics in Orthopaedics: Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geesink RGT, de Groot K, Klein CPAT. Bonding of Bone to Apatite Coated Implants.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwald and Garino Alternative Bearing Surfaces: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Supplement 2, Part 2 J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83-A. 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop. 1979; 141: 17–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty: An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969; 51A:737–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McNally SA, Shepperd JAN, Mann CV, Walczak JP. The Results of twelve years use of a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stem, J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2000, 82-B: 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Røkkum M, Brandt M, Bye K, Hetland KR, Waage S, Reigstad A.: Polyethylene wear, Osteolysis and Acetabular loosening with an HA Coated Hip Prosthesis, A Follow-up of 94 Consecutive Arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81-B. Number 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sedel L, Nizard RS, Kerboull L et al. Alumina-Alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin Orthop 298: 175–183 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Urban JA, Garvin KL, Boese CK, Bryson L, Pederson DR, Callaghan JJ, Miller RK Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty, Seventeen to Twenty-one-Year Results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83-A; 1688–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Willman G, Schikora N, Pitto RP. Retrieval of Ceramic Wear Couples in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Key Engineering Materials. Vols. 240–242 (2003); 813–816.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon TR, Rowe SM, Jung ST, Seon KJ, Maloney WJ.: Polythene Wear in Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 80-A. 1459–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buchanan, J.M. (2006). Comparison of polythene liners with alumina liners in hydroxyapatite hip arthroplasty. In: Benazzo, F., Falez, F., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_31

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1634-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1635-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics