Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ceramics in Orthopaedics ((CIO))

Abstract

Wear and simulator testing are complicated tasks. Controlled wear testing should not be routinely done to qualify a material, but rather to elucidate wear mechanisms. What is meant by a simulator? It generally, may be described as a machine used to test a joint replacement under conditions approximating those occurring in the human body. Simulator tests, on the other hand, can be used to conduct accelerated protocols that replicate/simulate particularly extreme conditions, thereby establishing the limits of performance for the material. Simulators vary in their level of sophistication but, however, a hip joint simulator play an important role in pre-clinical validation of biomaterials used for orthopaedic implants. Simulators are necessary to perform wear tests on biomaterials prior the implantation in the human body in order to obtain quality control and to acquire further knowledge as to the tribological processes that involve joint prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calonius OSaikko V. Analysis of polyethylene particles produced in different wear conditions in vitro, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002; 219–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Lowenstein JD, Jasty M Syniuta WD. The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catelas I, Medley JB, Campbell PA, Huk OL Bobyn JD. Comparison of in vitro with in vivo characteristics of wear particles from metal-metal hip implants, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2004; 70:167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G Cochran GV. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait, J Orthop Res, 1989; 7:849–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking, J Orthop Res, 1990; 8:383–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bragdon CR, Jasty M, Muratoglu OK, O’Connor DO Harris WH. Third-body wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in a hip simulator, J Arthroplasty, 2003; 18:553–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paul JP McGrouther DA. Forces transmitted at the hip and knee joint of normal and disabled persons during a range of activities, Acta Orthop Belg, 1975; 41Suppl 1:78–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergmann G, Graichen F Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients, J Biomech, 1993; 26:969–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saikko V. A 12-station anatomic hip joint simulator, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith SL Unsworth A. A five-station hip joint simulator, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barbour PS, Stone MH Fisher J. A hip joint simulator study using simplified loading and motion cycles generating physiological wear paths and rates, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith AA Dowson D. Development of a ten-station, multi-axis hip joint simulator, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldsmith AA Dowson D. A multi-station hip joint simulator study of the performance of 22 mm diameter zirconia-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene total replacement hip joints, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  14. Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD, Chan FW, Lippincott A Tanzer M. Kinematics of the MATCO hip simulator and issues related to wear testing of metal-metal implants, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

  15. Affatato S, Torrecillas R, Taddei P, Rocchi M, Fagnano C, Ciapetti G Toni A. Advanced nanocomposite materials for orthopaedic applications. I. A long-term in vitro wear study of zirconia-toughened alumina, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mizoue T, Yamamoto K, Masaoka T, Imakiire A, Akagi M Clarke IC. Validation of acetabular cup wear volume based on direct and two-dimensional measurements: hip simulator analysis, J Orthop Sci, 2003; 8:491–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith SL Unsworth A. A comparison between gravimetric and volumetric techniques of wear measurement of UHMWPE acetabular cups against zirconia and cobaltchromium-molybdenum femoral heads in a hip simulator, Proc Inst Mech Eng

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt

About this paper

Cite this paper

Affatato, S., Leardini, W., Zavalloni, M. (2006). Hip Joint Simulators: State of the Art. In: Benazzo, F., Falez, F., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_27

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1634-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1635-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics