Acetabular cup revision: pitfalls and solutions

  • W. Mittelmeier
  • M. Haenle
  • J. Kircher
  • R. Bader
  • M. Hauschild
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


Femoral Head Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Femoral Stem Ceramic Head Acetabular Revision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bader R, Mittelmeier W et al (2005) Pitfalls in the use of acetabular reinforcement rings in total hip revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 125: 558–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bader R, Steinhauser E et al (2004) Differences between the wear couples metal-onpolyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15: 711–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Branson JJ, Goldstein WM (2003) Primary total hip arthroplasty. AORN J 78: 947–974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson JA (1993) Characteristics of metal and ceramic total hip bearing surfaces and their effect on long-term ultra high molecular weight polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop 294: 361–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Antonio J, Capello W et al (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243: 126–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Della Valle CJ, Berger RA et al. (2004) Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 420: 55–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drake C, Ace M et al. (2002) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Aorn J 76: 414–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garino JP (2001) Revision Strategies for Ceramic-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement. in Toni A, Willmann G (eds.) Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 52–57.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geipel U, Herrmann M (2004) Das infizierte Implantat. Teil 1: Bakteriologie, Orthopäde 33: 1411–1428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Good V, Widding K et al. (2004) Reducing Wear Using the Ceramic Surface on Oxidized Zirconium Heads. in Lazennec J-Y, Dietrich M (eds.): Ceramics in Orthopaedics 9th Biolox“Symposium Proceedings, Springer Heidelberg, 93–98.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauschild M, Bader R et al. (2005) Implantatauswahl in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik in Thümler P, Forst R, Zeiler G (eds.) Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks. Springer Heidelberg, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mittelmeier H (1964) Tissue reactions in allo-arthroplasty of the hip joint. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 306: 163–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mittelmeier H, Singer L (1956) Anatomical and histological studies on arthroplasty with plexiglass endoprosthesis; possibilities and limitations of reformation of joints. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 48: 519–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paprosky WG, Bradford MS et al. (1994) Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. Chir Organi Mov 79: 285–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paprosky WG, Perona PG et al. (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9: 33–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perdreau-Remington F, Stefanik D et al. (1996) A four-year prospective study on microbial ecology of explanted prosthetic hips in 52 patients with “aseptic” prosthetic joint loosening. Eur. J. Clin. Micobiol. Infect. Dis 15: 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puolakka TJ, Pajamaki KJ et al. (2001) The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 72: 433–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt RD (2002) Preoperative planning for revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 31: 179–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuh A, Mittelmeier W et al (2006) Severe damage ot the femoral head after dislocation and difficult reduction maneuvers after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 126(2): 134–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scifert CF, Noble PC et al (2001) Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Orthop Clin North Am 32: 553–67, vii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Willert HG (1977) Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 11: 157–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willert HG, Schreiber A (1969) Different reactions of osseous and soft supporting tissues to autopolymerizing plastic implants. Z Orthop 106: 231–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willmann G (1999) CeramTec’s Recommendations for Revision when Using BIOLOXrforte Femoral Heads. In Sedel L, Willmann G (eds.): Reliability and Long-term Results of Ceramics in Orthopaedics, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 64–66.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wright J, Pellicci P et al (2001) Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components. A prospective analysis with quantitive computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: 529–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Mittelmeier
  • M. Haenle
  • J. Kircher
  • R. Bader
  • M. Hauschild

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations