Comparison of functional activity of hip resurfacing with total hip arthroplasty

  • J. D. Witt
  • V. Kannan
  • T. White
Conference paper
Part of the Ceramics in Orthopaedics book series (CIO)


Juvenile Arthritis UCLA Score Tegner Activity Score Excellent Short Term Result Function WOMAC Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Daniel J, Pynset P B, McMinn D J. Metal on Metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 2004,86-B: 177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amstutz HC, Beaule P B, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: 2–6 year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 2004,86-A: 28–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent P B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg, 2005, 87-B:167–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips, J Bone Joint Surg. 2005 87-B, 324–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh S, Trikha SP, Edge A J. Hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stems in young patients. A prospective ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004, 86-B:1118–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Witt
  • V. Kannan
  • T. White

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations