Skip to main content

Gender, Wages, and Productivity: An Analysis of the Tourism Industry in Northern Portugal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Methods in Tourism Economics

Abstract

Tourism represents a major economic activity in Portugal, with an enormous wealth and employment growth potential. A significant proportion of jobs in the industry tourism are occupied by women, given that this industry is characterized by a relatively higher percentage of female employees. Despite the evidence of female progress with regard to their role in the Portuguese labor market, women continue to earn less than their male counterparts. This is clearly the case of the tourism industry, where statistics reveal a persistent gender wage gap. The objective of this paper is to provide empirical evidence on the determinants of gender wage inequality in the tourism industry in northern Portugal. Relying on firm-level wage equations and production functions, gender wage and productivity differentials are estimated and then compared. The comparison of these differentials allows inferring whether observed wage disparities are attributable to relatively lower female productivity, or instead disparities are due to gender wage discrimination. This approach is applied to tourism industry data gathered in the matched employer-employee data set Quadros de Pessoal (Employee Records). The main findings indicate that female employees in the tourism industry in northern Portugal are less productive than their male colleagues and that gender differences in wages are fully explained by gender differences in productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The tourism industry is represented by observations regarding the economic sector “hotels and restaurants”, defined by the Portuguese classification of economic activities (Instituto Nacional de Estatística 2003).

  2. 2.

    In terms of tourism, the North region is known as the Oporto and North region.

  3. 3.

    Hellerstein and Neumark (1995) use the same data and empirical framework to compare wage and productivity differentials among workers of different age groups.

  4. 4.

    Ilmakunnas and Maliranta (2005) conclude that this result is not robust with regard to fixed effects estimation.

  5. 5.

    By focusing on firm-level wage equations, it is possible to jointly estimate wage equations and production functions. This joint estimation allows for formal tests on the equality of the coefficients of the wage equations and production functions. Hellerstein et al. (1999) consider that by jointly estimating firm-level wage equations and production functions, potential biases introduced by unobservable effects regarding wages and production will affect the estimations in a similar manner.

  6. 6.

    As referred earlier on, the current study applies an empirical framework similar to that of Hellerstein and Neumark (1999) and Hellerstein et al. (1999). However, rather than estimating firm-level wage equations and production functions based on non-linear regression methods, this study performs the estimations using linear methods as in McDevitt et al. (2009).

  7. 7.

    The firm’s total wage bill represents the aggregation of the individual-level wage equation over all workers employed at the firm (Hellerstein et al. 1999). The individual-level wage equation is expressed as W i  = w m M i  + w f F i , where W i represents the average wage of employee i, M i and F i are dummy variables for male and female employees, respectively, and w m and w f are the average paid male and female wages. Summing this equation over all workers employed at the firm yields the firm’s total wage bill (14.1).

  8. 8.

    As in Hellerstein et al. (1999), it is assumed that wage differentials between two types of employees within one demographic group are equal to the wage differentials between those same two types of employees within another demographic group. For example, the wage differentials between young aged women and young aged men are assumed to be equal to the wage differentials between old aged women and old aged men. Similarly, the wage differentials between young aged women and old aged women are assumed to be equal to the wage differentials between young aged men and old aged men. It is also assumed that the share of employees in a firm defined by one demographic group is constant across all other demographic groups.

  9. 9.

    In this case, labor input is measured in male equivalent units.

  10. 10.

    Haltiwanger et al. (1999, 2007) also use the variable turnover as a proxy for value added in the production function specification applied in their investigation of the relationship between the firm’s productivity levels and labor force composition.

  11. 11.

    The firm’s employees are divided into different groups based on five demographic characteristics: gender, education, age, tenure, and occupation. Hence, the employees are classified into two gender groups, five education groups, three age groups, three tenure groups, and eight occupation groups.

  12. 12.

    Given the joint estimation of the firm-level wage equation and production function, a formal test on the equality of the female coefficients (that is, a formal test on the equality of gender wage and productivity differentials) is performed. The null hypothesis of equal coefficients is rejected with a p-value of 0.000.

References

  • Ashraf J, Ashraf B (1993) Estimating the gender wage gap in Rawalpindi city. J Dev Stud 29(2):365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Ind Labor Relat Rev 55(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte (2008) Plano de Acção para o Desenvolvimento Turístico do Norte de Portugal. Ministério do Ambiente, do Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento Regional, Coimbra

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeland T, Klette TJ (1999) Do higher wages reflect higher productivity? Education, gender, and experience premiums in a matched plant-worker data set. In: Haltiwanger JC, Lane JI, Spletzer JR, Theeuwes JJ, Troske KR (eds) The creation and analysis of employer-employee matched data. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 231–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger JC, Lane JI, Spletzer JR (1999) Productivity differences across employers: the roles of employer size, age, and human capital. Am Econ Rev 89(2):94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger JC, Lane JI, Spletzer JR (2007) Wages, productivity, and the dynamic interaction of businesses and workers. Labour Econ 14(3):575–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein JK, Neumark D (1995) Are earnings profiles steeper than productivity profiles? Evidence from Israeli firm-level data. J Hum Resour 30(1):89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein JK, Neumark D (1999) Sex, wages, and productivity: an analysis of Israeli firm-level data. Int Econ Rev 40(1):95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein JK, Neumark D (2007) Production function and wage equation estimation with heterogeneous labor: evidence from a new matched employer-employee data set. In: Berndt ER, Hulten CR (eds) Hard-to-measure goods and services: essays in honor of Zvi Griliches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 31–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, Troske KR (1999) Wages, productivity, and worker characteristics: evidence from plant-level production functions and wage equations. J Labor Econ 17(3):409–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmakunnas P, Maliranta M (2005) Technology, labour characteristics, and wage-productivity gaps. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 67(5):623–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2003) Classificação portuguesa das actividades económicas (CAE – Rev. 2.1). Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker BF, Santos MC (1991) Human capital and earnings in Portugal. Econ Educ Rev 10(3):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunze A (2008) Gender wage gap studies: consistency and decomposition. Empirical Econ 35(1):63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes ER (coord) (2010) A constelação do turismo na economia portuguesa. Edições Jornal Sol, Mirandela

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt CL, Irwin JR, Inwood K (2009) Gender pay gap, productivity gap, and discrimination in Canadian clothing manufacturing in 1870. East Econ J 35(1):24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes R (2007) Gender wage inequality in the Portuguese labor market. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Braga

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes R (2009) Gender wage differentials and occupational distribution. Notas Econó 29:26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Economia e da Inovação (2007) Plano Estratégico Nacional do Turismo. Turismo de Portugal, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade Social (2007) Quadros de Pessoal, Data in magnetic media

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk-Turner E, Turner CT (2001) Sex differentials in earnings in the South Korean labor market. Fem Econ 7(1):63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman S, Weisberg J (1998) Gender wage differentials and discrimination among Israeli managers. Int J Manpower 19(3):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca R (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14(3):693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plasman R, Sissoko S (2004) Comparing apples with oranges: revisiting the gender wage gap in an international perspective, Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion paper 1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos MC, González MP (2003) Gender wage differentials in the Portuguese labor market. Research Center in Industrial, Labour, and Managerial Economics Discussion paper 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos L, Varejão J (2006) Employment, pay and discrimination in the tourism industry. Research – work in progress FEP – N° 205, Universidade do Porto, Porto. http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.02.25_WP205_santosvarejao.pdf

  • Vieira JAC, Pereira PT (1993) Wage differential and allocation: an application to the Azores islands. Economia 17(2):127–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira JAC, Cardoso AC, Portela M (2005) Gender segregation and the wage gap in Portugal: an analysis at the establishment level. J Econ Inequality 3(2):145–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward M (2001) The gender salary gap in British academia. Appl Econ 33(13):1669–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Portuguese Ministry of Labor and Social Solidarity for the access to the data set used in this paper. The access to the data was provided by the protocol signed between the Ministry and the University of Minho.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Mendes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

14.7 Appendix

14.7 Appendix

Variable

Description

Shmale

Share of male employees

Shfemale

Share of female employees

Shed4

Share of employees with highest completed degree of education ≤ 4 years

Shed6

Share of employees with highest completed degree of education = 6 years

Shed9

Share of employees with highest completed degree of education = 9 years

Shed12

Share of employees with highest completed degree of education = 12 years

Shed15

Share of employees with highest completed degree of education ≥ 15 years

Shyoung

Share of young aged employees (age ≤ 29 years)

Shprime

Share of prime aged employees (30 years ≤ age ≤ 54 years)

Shold

Share of old aged employees (age ≥ 55 years)

Shorten

Share of employees with short tenure (tenure ≤ 4 years)

Shmedten

Share of employees with medium tenure (5 years ≤ tenure ≤ 9 years)

Shlongten

Share of employees with long tenure (tenure ≥ 10 years)

Shtopman

Share of executive civil servants, industrial directors, and executives

Shprofscien

Share of professionals and scientists

Shmidmantec

Share of middle managers and technicians

Shadminist

Share of administrative and related workers

Shservsales

Share of service and sales workers

Shskllcrfts

Share of skilled workers, craftsmen, and similar

Shmachassem

Share of machine operators and assembly workers

Shunskllwrk

Share of unskilled workers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendes, R., Vareiro, L.C. (2013). Gender, Wages, and Productivity: An Analysis of the Tourism Industry in Northern Portugal. In: Matias, Á., Nijkamp, P., Sarmento, M. (eds) Quantitative Methods in Tourism Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2879-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics