The Economic Relations of Bosnia–Herzegovina and FYROM with the Other States that Emerged from the Breakup of Yugoslavia Considering the Ohrid and Dayton Agreements: The Phenomenon of Yugonostalgia in Trade and Economic Relations of Those Countries

Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


In the mid-1980s, in the former Yugoslavia, the phenomenon of the rise of nationalism among the ethnic groups that make up the country appeared. The revival of nationalistic passions led to the dissolution of the country in a particularly bloody ethnic conflict in the early 1990s. This process contributed greatly to the appearance in leadership positions of the Yugoslavian government structures of individuals who used the ethnic passions of the people of the country in order to reap personal benefits. The main passions were rooted in events that took place in Yugoslavia during the Second World War, the interwar period and the formation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, which was later renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. To resolve the ethnic conflict in the former Yugoslavia the international community had to intervene militarily in both cases of the conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo and politically in the conflicts in Bosnia and FYROM in an effort to achieve the Dayton and Ohrid agreements. In the years that followed the dismantling of Yugoslavia into the countries that was created by, a phenomenon appeared among people of different social groups: they felt nostalgic for their life in the years of Yugoslavia; this phenomenon has been termed in literature as “Yugonostalgia”. This study is an attempt to analyze not only the economic and trade relations between Bosnia-Herzegovina and FYROM with the other states which were parts of former Yugoslavia in light of the spirit of the Dayton and Ohrid agreements, but the phenomenon of “Yugonostalgia” as well. Since a large volume of trade of both countries is associated with the states that emerged from the breakup of Yugoslavia, we will consider if this is linked to the political-social climate that was shaped by the two agreements. We will also study if the phenomenon of the strengthened “Yugonostalgia” had obvious effects on the trade or if, instead, the constant and growing trade and economic relations are linked with the socioeconomic structures developed in Yugoslavia. Moreover, both the economic conditions of the degradation period of Yugoslavia and the transition of newcomers to the market economy are going to be examined.


Armed Conflict Territorial Integrity Commercial Transaction Free Trade Zone Framework Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anastasakis, O, Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic (2002) Balkan Regional Cooperation & European Integration. London, The Hellenic Observatory, The European Institute, The London School of Economics and Political Science: 86Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett W (2001) Regional co-operation in South-East Europe: panacea or dysfunction? Banka Mag, Zagreb, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett W (2003) Regional cooperation and economic development in South East Europe: obstacles and opportunities. Paper presented at the Second EACES Dubrovnik conference, Inter-University Centre, 10–12 AprGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchini S, Uvalic M (eds) (1997) The Balkans and the challenge of economic integration – regional and European perspectives. Longo Editore, RavennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Borovas G (2008) ‘Oι συμϕωνίεΑ Dayton και AχρίδαΑ ωΑ μοντέλα επίλυσηΑ εθνοτικών συγκρούσεων. Aξιολόγηση και σύγκριση [The Dayton and Ohrid agreements as models to resolve ethnic conflicts. Evaluation and comparison] (University of Western Macedonia)Google Scholar
  6. Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Foreign Trade Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, unpublished material, Sarajevo, 12 Jan 2000Google Scholar
  7. Christie E (2001) Potential trade in Southeastern Europe: a gravity model approach, Vienna, WIIW projects on ‘Long-Term Development in Southeast Europe’ and ‘Regionalism in Southeast Europe’ (
  8. Commission of the European Communities (2002) ‘Report from the commission – the stabilisation and association process for South East Europe – first annual report’, Brussels, 4 Apr, COM (2002) 163 FinalGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities (2003) Report from the commission – the stabilisation and association process for South East Europe – second annual report’, Brussels, 26 Mar, COM (2002) 139 FinalGoogle Scholar
  10. Damijan J, Masten I (2002) Time-dependent efficiency of free trade agreements: the case of Slovenia and the CEFTA agreement. LICOS discussion paper no. 117/2002, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS Centre for Transition EconomiesGoogle Scholar
  11. Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Forecast – Economies in Transition – Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union – Regional Overview, London, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  12. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2003) Transition report 2003. Integration and regional cooperation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gligorov V (1997) Trade in the Balkans. WIIW Monthly Report no. 3, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. Gligorov V (1998) Trade and investment in the Balkans. In: Vladimir G, Vidovic H (eds) On the way to normality – the states on the territory of former Yugoslavia in the Postwar period. WIIW Paper no. 250, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  15. Gligorov V, Kaldor M, Tsoukalis L (1999) Economic reconstruction and European integration. Paper presented at the LSE – WIIW conference reconstruction and integration in Southeast Europe – economic aspects, Vienna, WIIW, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinic B (1994) Ekonomski tokovi na prostoru SFRJ i modaliteti njihovog obnavljanja (‘Economic flows in the area of SFR Yugoslavia and means for their renewal’). In: Tomislav P (ed) Strategija povratka Jugoslavije na svetsko trziste (Strategy for Yugoslavia’s return to the world market). Institut ekonomskih nauka, Belgrade, pp 88–115Google Scholar
  17. Hristidis G (2003) Tα κομμουνιστικά Bαλκάνια. Eισαγωγή στην εσωτερική και εξωτερική πολιτική στην Aλβανία, Bουλγαρία, Γιουγκοσλαβία και Pουμανία την περίοδο 1945–1989 [The communist Balkans. Introduction to domestic and foreign policy in Albania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Romania in the period 1945–1989]. Thessaloniki Vanias (in Greeks)Google Scholar
  18. Ivanović N (2002). Vlast i drzava. Beograd. s.nGoogle Scholar
  19. (IMF) I. M. F. (2003) International Monetary Fund (IMF). From
  20. (wiiw), T. V. I. f. I. E. S. (2003) The Vienna Institute for international economic studies (wiiw). From
  21. (I.M.F.) Direction of trade statistics yearbook, Washington, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  22. (I.M.F.) Direction of trade statistics quarterly, Washington, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  23. Jovicic M, Zdravkovic M, Dragutinovic Mitrovic R (2001) Federal Republic Yugosalvia: trade potentials and comparative advantages, Vienna, WIIW projects on ‘Long-Term Development in Southeast Europe’ and ‘Regionalism in Southeast Europe’ (
  24. Kaminski B, de la Rocha M (2002) Policy-induced integration in Balkans: policy options and their assessment, in World Bank (2002), JuneGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuzmanović B (1995) Social distance towards individual nation: ethnic distance. Society in crisis: Yugoslavia in the early 90s. L. Mladen. Beograd, VišnjićGoogle Scholar
  26. Lampe JR (2000) Yugoslavia as history. Twice there was a country. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Lijphart A (1977) Democracy in plural societies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Messerlin P, Miroudot S (2003) Trade liberalisation in South East Europe: from a network of 23 FTAs to a full free trade area? A summary. Paper presented at the WIIW conference, 21 NovGoogle Scholar
  29. Michalopoulos C (2002) The Western Balkans in world trade – an sesay in memoriam of Bela Balassa. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Miljovski J, Uzunov V (2001) International and regional economic integration in South East Europe – the case of Macedonia’, Vienna, WIIW projects on ‘Long-term development in Southeast Europe’ and ‘Regionalism in Southeast Europe’ (
  31. Miljković D, Vladimir Vučković (2006) Serbian Foreign Trade, Competitiveness and Exchange Rate Policy. Agora without frontiers 12(2):13Google Scholar
  32. Muço M, Frasheri A (2003) Does economic cooperation in the Balkans follow ethnic lines? An alternative. In: Franicevic V, Kimura H (eds) Globalisation, democratization and development – European and Japanese views of change in South East Europe. Masmedia, Zagreb, pp 325–348Google Scholar
  33. Ni Aiolain F (2001) The fractured soul of the Dayton peace agreement: A legal analysis. Reconstructing multiethnic societies: The case of Bosnia – Herzegovina. D. Š. F. Bieber. Hampshire, Ashgate Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen D (1995) Balkan odyssey. Gollancz Victor, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Papazoglou C (2005) Oι οικονομίες της Nότιο-Aνατολικής Eυρώπης [The economies of Southeast Europe]. s.i., Kritiki Publication (in Greek)Google Scholar
  36. Petrovic T (2007) The territory of the former Yugoslavia in the mental maps of former Yugoslavs: Nostalgia for space. Sprawy Narodowościowe, Seria NovaGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanimirović BM, Stanisavić (1987) Marksizam i Socijalisticko Samoupravljnje (Marxism and Socialist self-management) Beograd, Naučna Knjiga in SerbianGoogle Scholar
  38. Udovicki K (1996) Market forces and economic integration: lessons from Yugoslavia, 1970–1987. In: Crnobrnja M, Papic Z, Bogetic Z (eds) The cost of war in former Yugoslavia. Peace and Crisis Management Foundation/Europa Press, Paris and BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  39. UNECE, Economic survey of Europe, Geneva, various issuesGoogle Scholar
  40. Uvalic M (1992) Investment and property rights in Yugoslavia – the long transition to a market economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Uvalic M (1993) The disintegration of Yugoslavia: its costs and benefits. Communist Econ Ec Trans 5(3):273–293Google Scholar
  42. Uvalic M (1997a) European economic integration – what role for the Balkans? In: Bianchini, Uvalic (eds) pp 19–34Google Scholar
  43. Uvalic M (1997b) Economic problems and prospects of the successor states of former Yugoslavia. In: Bianchini, Uvalic (eds) pp 161–184Google Scholar
  44. Uvalic M (2001a) Regional co-operation in Southeastern Europe. In: Veremis T, Daianu D (eds) Balkan reconstruction. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Uvalic M (2001b) Regional co-operation in Southeast Europe. J Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 1(1):23–40Google Scholar
  46. Uvalic M (2002a) Economic integration in Southeastern Europe. Ekonomski Anali XLVI:121–147, October 2002Google Scholar
  47. Uvalic M (2002b) Regional cooperation and the enlargement of the European Union: lessons learned? Int Polit Sci Rev 23(3):319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uvalic M (2003a) Trade liberalisation in Southeastern Europe – recent controversies and open questions. In: Proceedings of the conference organised by the Peace and Crisis Management Foundation, Cavtat, Croatia, MayGoogle Scholar
  49. Uvalic M (2003b) Trade liberalisation in the Balkans – a blessing in disguise? In: Conference on trade & economic integration of the Western Balkan countries in the European Union organised by the Albanian Center for International Trade (ACIT) in cooperation with the Ministry of Economy, Tirana, ACIT Research Paper, Tirana, 12–13 Dec 2003 (
  50. World Bank (2002) Trade policies and institutions in the countries of South Eastern Europe in the EU association and stabilization process – regional report, Washington, 28 JuneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Balkan StudiesUniversity of Western MacedoniaFlorinaGreece

Personalised recommendations