• Lidia Diappi


This last chapter draws some conclusions from all the studies presented in this book. A first issue concerns the structural characteristics of emergence: spatial scale, temporal spans, abrupt changes and discontinuities, threshold effects.

Moreover an attempt to put together the common findings on residential choice and gentrification is carried out by synthesizing the more relevant results in the different chapters.

Probably the most important message of this chapter is that, beside the emergence in residential mobility, which is the topic of this book, other relevant phenomena in housing market could benefit of the micro bottom up perspective pointed out in this book.

The most relevant are cycles and bubbles. These are emergent phenomena, caused by a myriad of interacting investors and buyers. The unsatisfied demand triggers increasing investments, but, as the construction takes time, investors risk to overshot the demand and prices/rents fall. Cycles and bubbles can be explained in terms of time lag between demand and supply. This assumption merits to be verified and could contradict the prevailing view of economists, by which cycles are dismissed as being the outcome of macroeconomic factors.


Real Estate House Price Housing Market Urban Space Physical Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abraham J, Hendershott PH (1996) Bubbles in metropolitan housing market. J Housing Res 7:191–207Google Scholar
  2. Anglin P (2006) Local dynamics and contagion in real estate market. Preliminary Draft, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Copernicus, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Capozza D, Hendershott P, Mack C (2004) An anatomy of price dynamics in illiquid markets: analysis and evidence from local housing markets. Real Estate Econ 32(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case KE, Shiller RJ (2003) Is there a bubble in the housing market? An analysis. Brookings papers on economic activity, vol 2003 n2 pag 299–342Google Scholar
  6. Dendrinos D, Sonis M (1990) Chaos and socio-spatial dynamics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diappi L, Bolchi P (2006) Gentrification waves in the inner-city of Milan: a multi agent/cellular automata model based on Smith’s rent gap theory. In: van Leeuwen JP, Timmermans HJP (eds) Innovations in design & decision support systems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Diappi L, Bolchi P (2008) Smith’s rent gap theory and local real estate dynamics: a multi- agent model. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32(1):6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiPasquale D, Weaton WC (1996) Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. J Urban Econ 35(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ettema D, De Jong K, Timmermans H, Bakema A (2006) PUMA: multi-agent modeling of urban systems. In: Koomen E, Bakema A, Stillwell J, Scholten H (eds) Land use modeling. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Flood RP, Hodrick RJ (1990) On testing speculative bubbles. J Econ Perspect 4(2):85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galster G, Quercia R (2000) Threshold effects and neighbourhood change. J Plann Edu Res 20(2):146–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasparova D, White M (2001) The responsiveness of house prices to macroeconomic forces: A cross-country comparison. European Journal of Housing Policy 1(3):385–416Google Scholar
  14. Levin EJ, Wright RE (1997) The impact of speculation on house prices in the United Kingdom. Econ Model 14(4):567–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller EJ, Hunt JD, Abraham JE, Salvini PA (2004) Microsimulating urban systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28:9–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moeckel R, Wegener M, Schwarze B (2005) Simulating land use change by modeling persons, households and dwellings. Paper presented at CUPUM conference, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller GR (1995) Understanding real estate’s physical and financial market cycles. Real Estate Finance 12(1):47–52, Institutional Investors, IncGoogle Scholar
  18. Müller GR (2002) What will the next real estate cycle look like? J Real Estate Portfolio Manag 8(2):115–125Google Scholar
  19. Nijkamp P, Reggiani A (1990) Interaction, evolution and Chaos in space. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Sullivan A (2003) Urban Economics. McGraw-Hill, IrwinGoogle Scholar
  21. Pyhrr SA, Webb JR, Born WL (1990) Analyzing real estate asset performance during periods of market disequilibrium under cyclical economic conditions. Research in real estate, vol 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, ConnGoogle Scholar
  22. Roehner B (1999) Spatial analysis of real estate price bubbles: Paris, 1984–1993. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith N (1979) Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people. APA J 45:538–548Google Scholar
  24. Stevenson S (2008) Modeling housing market fundamentals: empirical evidence of extreme market conditions. Real Estate Econ 36(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stiglitz JU (1990) Symposium on bubbles. J Econ Perspect 4:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tirtiroglu D (1992) Efficiency in housing markets: temporal and spatial dimensions. J Housing Econ 2(3):276–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waddeln P, Borning A, Noth M, Freier N, Becke M, Ulfarsson G (2003) Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: design and implementation of urbanSim. Netw Spat Econ 3:43–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wheaton WC (1987) The cyclic behavior of the national office market. AREUEA J 15(4):281–299Google Scholar
  29. Wheaton WC (1999) Real estate cycles: some fundamentals. Real Estate Econ 27(2):209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou WX, Sornette D (2006) Is there a bubble in the US? Physica A 361:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and PlanningPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations