Industrial Policy for SMEs Renewal: The Opportunity of Service Platforms

  • Bruno Basalisco
  • Guido M. Rey
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


This work considers the application of a platform strategy in order to promote the adoption of advanced network infrastructures by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). First, we analyse the incentives of industrial players in a context where SMEs playing an important economic role and where traditional rather than high-tech sectors of activity are predominant – with specific reference to the Italian case. Second, we review the contributions of the economic and managerial literature on platforms or two-sided markets. We leverage this by proposing a policy application of the platform concept, showing its potential benefits in allowing the manufacturing sector to gain from access to the service economy. We classify platforms according to their function and identify those types which can serve the purpose of industrial promotion. This leads us to review governance aspects which are paramount to platform functioning given the policy context.


Supply Chain Professional Service Service Platform Italian Economy General Purpose Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acconcia A et al (2009) Adozione e diffusione delle Ict nelle imprese manifatturiere italiane. In: Rondi L, Silva F (eds) Produttività e cambiamento nell’industria italiana. il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonelli C (1997a) A regulatory regime for innovation in the communication industries. Telecommun Policy 21(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonelli C (1997b) New information technology and the knowledge-based economy. The Italian evidence. Rev Ind Organ 12(4):593–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 37(3):668–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies as ’engines of growth’? J Econometrics 65:83–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. Rand J Econ 34(2):309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesbrough H (2011) In: Di Minin A (ed) Open services innovation competere in una nuova era, Sxi Springer per l’Innovazione. Springer, MilanoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombo M, Grilli L (2006) Supporting high-tech start-ups: lessons from Italian technology policy. Int Entrepreneurship Manage J 2(2):189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colombo MG, Grilli L (2007) Technology policy for the knowledge economy: public support to young ICT service firms. Telecommun Policy 31(10/11):573–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans DS (2009) How catalysts ignite: the economics of platform-based start-ups. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, Chap. 5Google Scholar
  11. Ferdows K, Lewis M, Machuca J (2004) Rapid-fire fulfillment. Harvard Bus Rev 82(11):104–110Google Scholar
  12. Friedman TL (2006) The world is flat. The globalized world in the twenty-first century. Penguin books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1985) Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev Econ Stud 52(170):383Google Scholar
  14. Gawer A (2009) Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. In: Gawer A (ed) Platforms, markets and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press Books, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: evidence from Intel. J Econ Manage Strategy 16(1):1–34Google Scholar
  17. Ghemawat P (1991) Market incumbency and technological inertia. Market Sci 10(2):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giannakouris, M. Smihly (2010) ICT usage in enterprises. In: Data in focus, EUROSTAT, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc 78(6):1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta S, Jain DC, Sawhney MS (1999) Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: an application to digital television. Market Sci 18(3):396–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. Rand J Econ 37(3):720–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagiu A (2007) Merchant or two-sided platform? Rev Netw Econ 6(2):115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ISTAT (2011) Le tecnologie dell’informazione e della comunicazione nelle imprese, statistiche in breve. ISTAT, RomaGoogle Scholar
  24. Joskow P (1987) Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. Am Econ Rev 77(1):168–185Google Scholar
  25. Nye J (2006) Soft power: the means to success in world politics. Perseus Books Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design. Manage Sci 51(10):1494–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rey GM (2012) Once upon a time …: a reflection on the relationships between industry and services. Economia Internazionale, 1, vol. 65 (pp.109–147)Google Scholar
  28. Rey GM, Varaldo R (2011) Crescita economica e rinnovamento imprenditoriale. Econ Ital 3:741–781Google Scholar
  29. Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: a progress report. Rand J Econ 37(3):645–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruiz-Aliseda F, Zemsky PB (2006) Adoption is not development: first mover advantages in the diffusion of new technology. SSRN, sSRN eLibraryGoogle Scholar
  32. Sallusti F (2010) Relazioni fra imprese e reti: analisi e studi di caso. L’Industria 1:83–113Google Scholar
  33. Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2002) Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy? Ind Corp Change 11(1):39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Market 68(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weyl EG (2010) A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Am Econ Rev, Volume 100, Number 4, pp. 1642-1672(31)Google Scholar
  36. Yoffie DB, Kwak M (2006) With friends like these. Harvard Bus Rev 84(9):p88–p98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di ManagementPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations