Skip to main content

Hybrid Space-Filling Designs for Computer Experiments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control ((FSQC,volume 10))

Abstract

Computer models play an increasingly important role in engineering design and in the study of complex systems, where physical experiments on the real system or even a prototype are prohibitively expensive. Both deterministic and stochastic computer models are used in these situations. A deterministic computer model is a set of complex equations whose solution depends on the input conditions and the levels of design factors or parameters but not on random elements. Examples include finite element models and computational fluid dynamics models. Space-filling designs are usually employed to study these deterministic computer models and often the modeling strategy involves fitting a spatial correlation or Kriging model (the Gaussian stochastic process model) to the data, because this model interpolates the experimental data exactly. We provide a survey of these designs and the modeling strategy, and propose a new type of hybrid space-filling design. The new design is a hybrid consisting of design points from a traditional space-filling design augmented by runs from a near saturated I-optimal design for a polynomial. We illustrate the construction of these designs with examples, and demonstrate their performance in response prediction for several situations. A comparison with standard space-filling designs is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, T. T., Bernshteyn, M. A., & Kabiri-Bamoradian, K. (2003). Constructing meta-models for computer experiments. Journal of Quality Technology, 35(3), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ankenman, B., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2008). Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. In Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, Miami (pp. 362–370).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bursztyn, D., & Steinberg, D. M. (2006). Comparison of designs for computer experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136, 1103–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen V., Tsui, K-L., Barton, R., & Meckensheime, M. (2006). A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments. IEE Transactions, 38, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fang, K. T., Li, R., & Sudjianto, A. (2006). Design and modeling for computer experiments. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hussain, M. F., Barton, R. R., & Joshi, S. B. (2002). Metamodeling: Radial basis functions, versus polynomials. European Journal of Operational Research, 138, 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, R. T., Montgomery, D. C., Jones, B., & Parker, P. A. (2010). Comparing computer experiments using high order polynomial metamodels. Journal of Quality Technology, 42(1), 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, R. T., Montgomery, D. C., & Jones, B. (2010). An empirical study of the prediction performance of space-filling designs. International Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, B., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). The design and analysis of the gaussian process model. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 25, 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loeppky, J.L., Sacks, J., & Welch, W. (2008). Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide. Technical Report Number 170, National Institute of Statistical Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKay, N. D., Conover, W. J., & Beckman, R. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Montgomery, D. C. (2009). The design and analysis of experiments, 7th ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morris, M. D., Mitchell, T. J., & Ylvisaker, D. (1993). Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics, 35, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2002). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd ed. New York: John.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., & Notz, W. I. (2003). The design and analysis of computer experiments. Springer series in statistics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Storlie, C. B., & Helton, J. C. (2008). Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: Example results. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Welch, W. J., Buck, R. J., Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Mitchell, T. J., & Morris, M. D. (1992). Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics, 34(1), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zahran, A., Anderson-Cook, C. M., & Myers, R. H. (2003). Fraction of design space to assess the prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas C. Montgomery .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, R.T., Montgomery, D.C., Kennedy, K.S. (2012). Hybrid Space-Filling Designs for Computer Experiments. In: Lenz, HJ., Schmid, W., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 10. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, vol 10. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2846-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics