Solution Approach

  • Thorben SeilerEmail author
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


A review of contributions suggesting measures to increase transportation efficiency was provided in the previous section. According to Stank and Goldsby (2000) in operative transportation decision making, primary cost saving opportunities include:


Planning Horizon Combination Scheme Freight Rate Original Order Transport Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albrecht W (2007) Neue Lösungsansätze aus der IT-Architektur. In: ten Hompel M (ed) Software in der Logistik. Huss-Verlag, München, pp 36–38Google Scholar
  2. Baker E, Joseph A, Rayco B (2005) Generating Set Partitioning Test Problems with known Optimal Integer Solutions. In: Golden BL, Raghavan S, Wasil E (eds) The Next Wave in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies. Springer Science and Business Media, Boston, MA, pp 29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bierwirth C, Schneider S, Kopfer H (2002) Elektronische Transportmärkte - Aufgaben, Entwicklungsstand und Gestaltungsoptionen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 44:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caputo A, Fratocchi L, Pelagagge P (2006) A genetic approach for freight transportation planning. Industrial Management & Data Systems 106:719–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du T, Wang F, Lu P (2007) A real-time vehicle-dispatching system for consolidating milk runs. Transportation Research Part E 43:565–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrer J, Karlberg J (2006) Mastering manufacturing innovation, Madrid,, [12.04.2010]
  7. Hall R (2003) Supply Chains. In: Hall RW (ed) Handbook of Transportation Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp 561–597Google Scholar
  8. House R, Jackson G (1995) Trends in computer applications in transportation and distribution management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 25:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liedtke G, Schepperle H (2004) Segmentation of the Transportation Market with Regard to Activity-based Freight Transport Modelling. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 7:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu J, Li C, Chan C (2003) Mixed truck delivery systems with both hub-and-spoke and direct shipment. Transportation Research Part E 39:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKinnon A, Ge Y (2006) The potential for reducing empty running by trucks: a retrospective analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 36:391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mentzer J (1986) Determining Motor Carrier Backhaul Markets. Industrial Marketing Management 15:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore E, Warmke J, Gorban L (1991) The Indispensable Role of Management Science in Centralizing Freight Operations at Reynolds Metals Company. Interfaces 21:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rider S (2003) Driving SCM Leadership. The advantages of integrating TMS to your SAP suite World Trade 16:62–63Google Scholar
  15. Stank T, Goldsby T (2000) A framework for transportation decision making in an integrated supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 16:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thonemann U, Behrenbeck K, Diederichs R, Großpietsch J, Küpper J, Leopoldseder M (2004) Supply Chain Champions. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  17. Trautmann A, Krause O (2007) Echtzeit und Serviceorientierung. In: ten Hompel M (ed) Software in der Logistik. Huss-Verlag, München, pp 39–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations