E-Marketplaces for Professional e-Services: Trust, Reputation and Performance

  • Alberto Francesconi
  • Claudia Dossena
Conference paper


Currently, Professional Service Firms (PSFs) are becoming more and more important in a ‘knowledge-worker based’ society. This trend is supported by the development and diffusion of web-based technologies, encouraging firms to outsource a wider variety of business functions, especially those not included in the company’s core competencies. Many web-based platforms offering services for contractor management in the field of professional e-services emerged in these years. Reputation mechanisms are arising as key components for them because they help to build trust and to favour cooperation among loosely connected and geographically dispersed economic agents. In this work, we aim at exploring the relationship between online reputation of professionals (individuals, groups or PSFs, in brief PSFs) and their performance. We exploit one of the most widely used Web platforms for professional e-services and contractor management in the world, Elance. We try to reduce the research gap due to the fact that few previous works focused on e-marketplaces where rated and tested PSFs offer their e-services.


High Earning Business Area Feedback Rating Repeated Interaction Lower Earning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Rowley, J. (2006) An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda, Internet Research 16(3):339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. and Finkelstein, S. (1998) Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best, in Klein D.A, The strategic management of intellectual capital, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snir, E.M. and Hitt, L.M. (2003) Costly Bidding In Online Markets For IT Services, Management Science 49(11): 1504–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J. and Lockwood, K. (2006) The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment, Experimental Economics 9(2): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dellarocas, C. (2003) The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms. Management Science 49(10):1407–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dilaghi, G.C., Arenas, A.E. and Silva, L.M. (2007) Reputation-based trust management systems and their applicability to grids, CoreGRID Technical Report, Number TR-0064.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E. and Kuwabara, K. (2000) Reputation Systems, Communications of the ACM 43(12): 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dellarocas, C. (2005) How Often Should Reputation Mechanisms Update a Trader’s Reputation Profile?, Info. Sys. Research 16(2):209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whitley, R. (2000) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, 2nd ed., Oxford Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haugstad, B., Gjersvik R. and Bygdàs, A.L. (2009) Idea Work And Types Of Activity Systems, paper presented at 25thEgos Colloquium 2009, Barcelona, July.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resnick, P. and Zeckhauser, R. (2001) Trust Among Strangers in Internet Transactions: Empirical Analysis of eBay’s Reputation System, The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce 11:127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melnik, M. and Alm, J. (2002) Does a Seller’s E-commerce Reputation Matter? Evidence from eBay Auctions, Journal of Industrial Economics 50:337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Houser, D. and Wooders, J. (2006) Reputation in auctions: theory and evidence from eBay, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 15(2):353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allen, F. (1984) Reputation and Product Quality, Rand Journal of Economics 15:311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shapiro, C. (1983) Premier for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98:659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brady, M. and Cronin, J. (2001) Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach, Journal of Marketing 65:34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Escalas, J. and Luce, M. (2004) Understanding the Effects of Process-Focused versus Outcome-Focused Thought During Advertising, Journal of Consumer Research 31:274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spence, M. (1973) Job Market Signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fombrun, C.J. and Shanley, M. (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy, Academy of Management Journal 33: 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R. (2002) Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal 23(12):1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butler, R. and Gill, J. (1995) Learning and Knowledge in Joint-ventures, The Importance of Trust, paper presented at the British Academy of Management annual conference, Sheffield, September.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gulati, R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances, Academy of Management Journal 38(1):85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kollock, P. (1999) The Production of Trust in Online Markets, in Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 16), eds. E.J. Lawler, M. Macy, S. Thyne, and H.A. Walker, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Research DepartmentUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations