Organizational Aspects and Governance of a Learning Environment Aimed at a Common Curricula for European Senior Civil Servants

  • Nunzio Casalino
  • Laura Ricci
Conference paper


The purpose of this work is to investigate the benefits of the introduction of a specific online environment in the training process of European civil servants. It includes the final results and the organisational impact of a training course combining 24 h of e-learning courses and 30 h (1 week) of intensive in-class courses. For each module, the e-learning part provided general training contents to enhance participants background required for in-class sessions. Through the designed learning activities and the analysed project results we want to demonstrate the effectiveness of the overall system (tasks, contents and organizational aspects) and promote e-learning adoption in the European Public Administration field. With a view to stimulating co-operation and the exchange of experts’ experience and best practices in Europe, the goal is to identify and test an innovative model of trans-national collaborative learning environment supported by European schools, Public Administration Institutes and e-learning experts.


Civil Servant Public Administration European Union Country Blended Learning Senior Civil Servant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Casalino, N., D’Atri, A., Fadda, C. (2005) Organisational impact and exploitation of the results of an Italian research project for e-health and medical training, proceedings of “ECIS 2005 – European Conference on Information Systems”, Regensburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W., White, R.E. (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No.3, pp. 522–37.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dewhurst, F.W., Cegarra, J.G. (2004) External communities of practice and relational capital, The Learning Organization International Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodgson, M. (1993) Organizational learning: a review of some literatures, Organisation Studies, Vol. 14 No.3, pp. 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flynn, N. (1995) The Future of Public Sector Management. Are There Some Lessons from Europe?, in International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 8, pp. 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olsen, J.P. e Peters, B.G. (1996) Lessons From Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies, Oslo, Scandinavian Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rose, H.C. (1998) A plan for training evaluation, Training and Development Journal, n.5, p. 23–26.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rumble, G. (2000) The Globalisation of Open and Flexible Learning: Considerations for Planners and Managers. On-line J. of. D. L. Adm., 3, 3. State University of West Georgia.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sitkin, S.B. (1992) Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses, Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 14 No.1, p. 231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche ed AziendaliUniversità degli Studi Guglielmo MarconiRomeItaly
  2. 2.International Relations CoordinatorUniversità degli Studi Guglielmo MarconiRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations