Abstract
Data quality represents a major strategic asset for organisations and privacy is one of the main influencing factors impacting on organisations ‘practices related to customers’ data collection. Other elements which affects this relationship are individuals handling data within the organisation and their different needs, however there is limited research focussing on these aspects. This work presents early findings of an empirical qualitative research using focus groups within a social constructivist approach to delve into managers’ perception of data quality and to understand the impact of privacy on organisational practices. Focus groups have been widely adopted in academic research as an exploratory method to collect people’s opinion. This study shows how some features, like involving pre-existing groups, the adoption of questionnaires and the workshops’ setting can positively influence focus groups’ outcome, encouraging participants’ co-operative interaction, helping them to clarify concepts and raising awareness about privacy and data quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Data from LinkedIn official website, http://press.linkedin.com/about/ [accessed on May 5th 2011].
- 2.
The discussion is available here: http://tinyurl.com/linkedin-dataquality [created on 20th May 2011].
- 3.
Participants’ professional experience ranged between 7 and 25 years.
References
Albrecht, T. L., Johnson, G. M. & Walther, J. B. (1993). Understanding Communication Processes in Focus Groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful Focus Groups (pp. 51–63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arazy, O., Oded, N., Patterson, R., & Yeo, L. (2011). Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems 27(4), 71–98
Bakhtin, M. M., Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (1986). Speech genres, and other late essays. Austin,: University of Texas Press.
Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data quality: concepts, methodologies and techniques. Berlin; New York: Springer.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Charreire, Petit, S., & Huault, I. (2008). From Practice-based Knowledge to the Practice of Research: Revisiting Constructivist Research Works on Knowledge. Management Learning, 39(1).
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
Davenport Hughes, C. (1954). Accuracy in Statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 3(3), 146–149.
Duran, E. (2009). Customer data management: the impacts of poor customer data quality on customer relationship management and organizations. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
Gibbs, A. (1997). Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups. from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
Grabowski, M., Massey, A. P., & Wallace, W. A. (1992). Focus groups as a group knowledge acquisition technique. Knowledge Acquisition, 4(4), 407–425.
Ho, D. (2006). The Focus Group Interview: Rising to the Challenge in Qualitative Research Methodology Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 5.1–5.19.
Hollander, J. A. (2004). The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 35.
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (1999). The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
Kenett, R. S., & Shmueli, G. (2011). On Information Quality. R. H. Smith School Research Paper No. 06–100.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–116.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing Focus Groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Munday, J. (2006). Identity in focus: The use of focus groups to study the construction of collective identity. Sociology, 40(1), 16.
Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27(1), 85–111.
Olson, J. E. (2003). Data quality : the accuracy dimension. San Francisco, Calif.; London: Morgan Kaufmann.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Allen Lane.
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vannan, E. (2001). Quality Data: An Improbable Dream? Educause Quarterly, 24(1), 56–58.
Wang, R. J., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
Warr, D. J. (2005). “It was fun… but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 200–225.
Whitley, E. A. (1996). Confusion, Social Knowledge and the Design of Intelligent Machines. Journal of experimental and theoretical artificial intelligence, 8(3/4), 365–381.
Wibeck, V., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Öberg, G. (2007). Learning in focus groups: an analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bertini, P. (2012). Focus Groups, Meaning Making and Data Quality. In: De Marco, M., Te'eni, D., Albano, V., Za, S. (eds) Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2788-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2789-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)