Skip to main content

Abstract

Data quality represents a major strategic asset for organisations and privacy is one of the main influencing factors impacting on organisations ‘practices related to customers’ data collection. Other elements which affects this relationship are individuals handling data within the organisation and their different needs, however there is limited research focussing on these aspects. This work presents early findings of an empirical qualitative research using focus groups within a social constructivist approach to delve into managers’ perception of data quality and to understand the impact of privacy on organisational practices. Focus groups have been widely adopted in academic research as an exploratory method to collect people’s opinion. This study shows how some features, like involving pre-existing groups, the adoption of questionnaires and the workshops’ setting can positively influence focus groups’ outcome, encouraging participants’ co-operative interaction, helping them to clarify concepts and raising awareness about privacy and data quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data from LinkedIn official website, http://press.linkedin.com/about/ [accessed on May 5th 2011].

  2. 2.

    The discussion is available here: http://tinyurl.com/linkedin-dataquality [created on 20th May 2011].

  3. 3.

    Participants’ professional experience ranged between 7 and 25 years.

References

  1. Albrecht, T. L., Johnson, G. M. & Walther, J. B. (1993). Understanding Communication Processes in Focus Groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful Focus Groups (pp. 51–63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arazy, O., Oded, N., Patterson, R., & Yeo, L. (2011). Information Quality in Wikipedia: The Effects of Group Composition and Task Conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems 27(4), 71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakhtin, M. M., Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (1986). Speech genres, and other late essays. Austin,: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data quality: concepts, methodologies and techniques. Berlin; New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charreire, Petit, S., & Huault, I. (2008). From Practice-based Knowledge to the Practice of Research: Revisiting Constructivist Research Works on Knowledge. Management Learning, 39(1).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport Hughes, C. (1954). Accuracy in Statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 3(3), 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duran, E. (2009). Customer data management: the impacts of poor customer data quality on customer relationship management and organizations. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs, A. (1997). Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups. from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html

  11. Grabowski, M., Massey, A. P., & Wallace, W. A. (1992). Focus groups as a group knowledge acquisition technique. Knowledge Acquisition, 4(4), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho, D. (2006). The Focus Group Interview: Rising to the Challenge in Qualitative Research Methodology Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 5.1–5.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollander, J. A. (2004). The Social Contexts of Focus Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (1999). The discourse reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kenett, R. S., & Shmueli, G. (2011). On Information Quality. R. H. Smith School Research Paper No. 06–100.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interactions between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing Focus Groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Munday, J. (2006). Identity in focus: The use of focus groups to study the construction of collective identity. Sociology, 40(1), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27(1), 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olson, J. E. (2003). Data quality : the accuracy dimension. San Francisco, Calif.; London: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vannan, E. (2001). Quality Data: An Improbable Dream? Educause Quarterly, 24(1), 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, R. J., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Warr, D. J. (2005). “It was fun… but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 200–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Whitley, E. A. (1996). Confusion, Social Knowledge and the Design of Intelligent Machines. Journal of experimental and theoretical artificial intelligence, 8(3/4), 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wibeck, V., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Öberg, G. (2007). Learning in focus groups: an analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Bertini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bertini, P. (2012). Focus Groups, Meaning Making and Data Quality. In: De Marco, M., Te'eni, D., Albano, V., Za, S. (eds) Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics