Advertisement

Korea’s New Techno-Scientific Strategy: Realigning State, Market and Society to Move Beyond Technological Catch-Up

  • Jitendra Uttam
Chapter

Abstract

Being a late-late industrializing country, Korea carefully designed a unique model of technological catch-up led by a ‘developmental state’ (Johnson 1982) and spearheaded by chaebol. The model became operational in two distinct but mutually reinforcing phases: first, an imitation-driven GRI System based on reverse engineering of foreign technologies; and second, a chaebol-led, private sector funded system of corporate R&D. During both phases, an uninterrupted inflow of foreign technology to Korea was supported by Cold War era ‘strategic constraints’ to maintain the U.S.-led ‘alliance system’ aimed at containing the perceived Soviet threat. The dynamic interplay between foreign technology and indigenous R&D efforts paved the way for Korea to substantially bridge its technological divide with the developed world, particularly in the manufacturing sector.1 Korean products from ships to chips, from computers to semiconductors acquired global recognition. Reflecting fierce competition with technologically advanced economies, the R&D budget of Korea has witnessed a phenomenal rise2.

Keywords

Reverse Engineering Developmental State Semiconductor Industry Dynamic Random Access Memory Foreign Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cho D (1991) Hanguk chaebol yongu [A study of the Korean chaebol]. Maeil Kyongje Sinmunsa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho D, Kim D, Rhee D (1998) Latecomer strategies: evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Organ Sci 9(4):489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi HS (1984) Industrial research in less developed countries. ESCAP, Regional Centre for Technology Transfer, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi HS (1988) Direction for technological self reliance: Korean approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 33:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu DY (1992) Bondoche Sanup eui Keupkyukhan Byunwha wa Urieui Daeung [Rapid changes in the semiconductor industry and our response]. Korea Maekyung Press, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung S (1999) Unification of National Innovation Systems: How Should it be Different between Germany and Korea?, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosi G (ed) (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Printer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Eros JL, Park WH (1989) The adoption and diffusion of imported technology. Croom Helm, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman C (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: PinterGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson C (1982) MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy 1925-1975. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim D (1986) Daejung Gyeongjeron [Mass-participatory economy]. Chongsa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim L-S (1997) Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim L, Lee J (1997) Korea’s entry into the computer industry and its acquisition of technological capability. Technovation 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim L (1999) Learning and innovation in economic development. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, Linsu (2003) “Crisis, Reform, and national Innovation in south Korea,” (pp.86–107), in William W. Keller and Richard J. Samuels (ed.), Crisis and Innovation in Asian Technology, Cambridge Online BooksGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee C (2005) Korea’s national innovation system . Proceedings of the ASIALICS 2nd international conference, Jeju, Korea, 17–20 Apr 2005Google Scholar
  17. Lim Y (2000) Development of the public sector in the Korean innovation system. Int J Technol Manage 20(5/6/7/8):684–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundvall B (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahlich J, Pascha W (2007) Innovation and technology in Korea: challenges of a newly advanced economy. Physica, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson R (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (1999) Managing national innovation systems. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel P, Pavitt K (1994) The nature and economic importance of the national innovation system, STI review 14. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Samsung Electronics (1989) Samsung Jeonja Ishipnyunsa [Samsung Electronics twenty-years]. Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  24. Shin T, Kim H (1994) Research foresight activities and technological development in Korea: science and technology policies in national R&D programs. Technol Forecast Soc Change 9(1):31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song SH (2009) R&D spending jumped 10 percent last year, Korea Herald, 16 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  26. Suh JH (2000) Korea’s innovation system: challenges and new policy agenda. Paper presented at INTECK, United Nations University, 2000-4, Maastricht, 7–10 Nov 2000Google Scholar
  27. Uttam, Jitendra (2006) Korea’s New Techno-Scientific State: Mapping a Strategic Change in the ‘Developmental State’, China Report (42)3:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for East Asian Studies, School of International StudiesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations