Advertisement

Long-Run Protection: Determining Key Features of Growth and Sustainability in Northeast Asia

  • Matthew A. Shapiro
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter attempts to advance understanding of the crucial links among growth, technological change, human capital accumulation, and openness and their impact on greenhouse gas (GHG)-related research and development (R&D) output in East Asia, specifically China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Looking at the 1952–2004 period, I test not only for the impacts of a science and technology (S&T) and innovation set of GHG-output related inputs, but also test for the presence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) in terms of the GDP-CO2 emissions relationship. This research builds upon the works of various important growth theorists, including Solow (1956, 1957), Nelson and Phelps (1966), Mankiw et al. (1992) and especially Benhabib and Spiegel (1994, 2002). The latter demonstrated the role of human capital on technological development (or more specifically technology catch-up) between 72 and 86 nations over extended periods of time, 1965–1985 and 1960–1995, respectively. In all of these studies, however, there is a limited role for openness to trade, capital, or technology in explaining variations in growth rates across countries. Nevertheless, and although certainly still controversial, many of the studies that have been done on East Asia and its so-called “economic miracle” argue that it is greater openness to trade, capital flows, and technology that have distinguished the East Asian experience from that of Latin America, Africa or other regions of developing countries.

Keywords

Technology Transfer Energy Intensity Environmental Kuznets Curve Asia Development Bank Northeast Asian Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amsden A (1989) Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxord University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow KJ, Bert B, Robert C, Partha D, Carl F, Holling CS, Bengt-Owe J, Simon L, Karl-Goran M, Perrings C, David P (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecol Appl 15:91–95Google Scholar
  4. Asia Development Bank (ADB) (2006) Carbon market initiative: the Asia Pacific carbon fund.Google Scholar
  5. Asia Development Bank (ADB) (2009) New ADB policy targets secure, Clean energy for Asia.Google Scholar
  6. Barro RJ, Lee J-W (2000) International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. CID Working Paper, No. 42Google Scholar
  7. Benhabib J, Spiegel MM (2002) Human capital and technology diffusion. FRBSF Working Paper 2003-02Google Scholar
  8. Benhabib J, Spiegel MM (1994) The role of human capital in economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross-country data. J Monetary Econ 34:143–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borensztein E, De Gregorio J, Lee JW (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? J Int Econ 45:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brajer V, Mead RW, Xiao F (2008) Health benefits of tunneling through the Chinese Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Ecol Econ 66:674–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock WA, Scott TM (2004) The green Solow model. Social Science Research Institute Working Paper No. 2004–16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ezproxy.gl.iit.edu/abstract=555262
  12. Bruvoll A, Foehn T (2006) Transboundary effects of environmental policy: Markets and emission leakages. Ecol Econ 59:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (2009) Terrestrial carbon management data sets and analyses. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/carbonmanagement/
  14. Chen S-H (2008) Elevated vision, enhanced illumination allowing energy policy to shine forth again in obscurity. http://www.tier.org.tw/eng2008/eng_analysis/EA200806_4.asp
  15. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2002) Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Lit 16:147–168Google Scholar
  16. Courtenay P (2007) Taiwan sets sights on clean energy. Taiwan Today Google Scholar
  17. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel Kortum (1994) International patenting and technology diffusion, NBER Working Paper No. 4931Google Scholar
  20. Edwards S (1998) Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? Econ J 108:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2009), International energy statistics. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=6&pid=29&aid=12&cid=&syid=1980&eyid= 2008&unit=BKWH
  22. Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, de Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  23. Findlay R (1978) Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: A simple dynamic model. Q J Econ 92:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F (2006) Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecol Econ 57:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene WH (2002) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  26. Gu K, Liu J, Wang Y (2009) Relationship between economic growth and water environmental quality of Anshan City in Northeast China. Chin Geogr Sci 19:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2009) Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries’ environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecol Econ 68:2168–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrison A (1996) Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. J Dev Econ 48:419–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2006) Penn world table Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang B-N, Hwang MJ, Yang CW (2008a) Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach. Ecol Econ 67:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang WM, Lee GWM, Wu CC (2008b) G.H.G. Emissions, G.D.P. Growth and the Kyoto Protocol: A revisit of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Policy 36:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones CI (2002) Introduction to economic growth. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim L (2003) Technology transfer & intellectual property rights: The Korean experience. In: UNCTAD-ICTSD (ed) Intellectual property rights and sustainable development. UNCTAD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim J-I, Lau L (1994) The sources of growth of the east Asian newly industrialized countries. J Jap Int Econ 8:235–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, SukJoon (2009) Strategy for low-carbon green growth in Korea, AAAS annual meeting, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28Google Scholar
  37. Langloi RN, Foss NJ (1997) Capabilities and governance: The rebirth of production in the theory of economic organization. DRUID Working Paper No. 97–2Google Scholar
  38. Lee HY, Ricci LA, Rigobon R (2004) Once again, is openness good for growth? J Dev Econ 75:451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu X, Helilig GK, Chen J, Heino M (2007) Interactions between economic growth and environmental quality in Shenzhen, China’s first special economic zone. Ecol Econ 62:559–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luzzati T, Orsini M (2009) Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 34:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mansfield E (1995) Intellectual property protection, direct investment, and technology transfer: Germany, Japan, and the United States. International Finance Corporate Discussion Paper, No. 27Google Scholar
  43. Millimet DL, List JA, Stegnos T (2003) The environmental Kuznets curve: Real progress of misspecified models? Rev Econ Stat 85:1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ministry of the Environment (MOE) of Japan, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (2008) Issues paper, The Second Asia 3R Conference, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) PRC (2009) China pursues leadership in new energy solutionsGoogle Scholar
  46. Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) PRC (2009) MEP releases emission reduction results of all provinces and five major power groupsGoogle Scholar
  47. Ministry of the Environment (MOE) of Japan (2007) Becoming a leading environmental nation in the 21st Century: Japan’s strategy for a sustainable societyGoogle Scholar
  48. Na J-J (2009) Korea to cut greenhouse gas emission by 30%. Korea Times, 4 August 2009Google Scholar
  49. Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson RR, Phelps ES (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 56:69–75Google Scholar
  51. OECD (2009) Main science and technology indicators (MSTI). www.sourceoecd.org2009
  52. Pascha W, Mahlich J (eds) (2007) Innovation and technology in Korea: Challenges of a newly advanced economy. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: A Skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. In: Bernanke B (ed) NBER macro annual 2000. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Political Econ 98:S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Romero-Avila D (2008) Questioning the empirical basis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: New evidence from a panle stationarity test robust to multiple breaks and cross-dependence. Ecol Econ 64:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rongping M (2009) Innovative policy for sustainable development in China. Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  57. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. USAID, and Asian Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Network (AECEN) (2008) Strengthening legal and policy frameworks for addressing climate change in Asia. AECEN Secretariat, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  61. USAID, and Environmental Cooperation-Asia (ECO-Asia) (2009) Financing secured through USAID’s support will help Slash 17 million tons of CO2 emissions from Chinese and Indian power plants. USAID/ECO-Asia e-Newletter 4: 1Google Scholar
  62. Wacziarg R (2001) Measuring the dyanmic gains from trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15:393–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wada T (2009) Recent developments in S&T policies after the lost decade. Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang J-Y (1990) Growth, technology transfer, and the long-run theory of international capital movements. J Int Econ 29:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang G, Maskus KE (2003) Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2973Google Scholar
  66. Yuan, Republic of China (Taiwan) Executive (2004) Taiwan Agenda 21: Vision and strategies for national sustainable development. Approved at the 18th Council Meeting of the Council for National Sustainable Development, Executive YuanGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang X, Zou H-F (1995) Foreign technology imports and economic growth in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1412Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations