The Role of the State in Qualitative Growth – A Consideration of Regional Innovation Clusters in Gangwon Province (South Korea)
Among the more recent instruments of spatial planning in South Korea is the designation of innovation clusters. Gangwon province, a partner province of Hanns-Seidel-Foundation, has designated three clusters for life sciences/biotechnology, new materials and medical science. Given the enormous center-periphery problems in Korea, where the capital region (Seoul, Incheon, Gyeonggi province) comprises nearly than half of the population of the country, such strategies to implement high technology production into the province are understandable. However, can it be successful and sustainable? This paper discusses the cluster strategy of Gangwon province and the challenges of innovation clusters in a peripheral region.
KeywordsIndustrial Policy Innovative Activity Capital Region Regional Innovation System Asian Crisis
- Boschma R (2004) Some reflections on regional innovation policy, paper prepared for the expert group meeting on “constructing regional advantage”, Brussels, 7 Dec 2004. Internet file: http://econ.geo.uu.nl/boschma/brusselmeetingpolicy.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2010.
- Den B, Frank AG, Seung-Gyo J (2009) Pros and Cons of “Backing Winners” in innovation policy, MPRA Paper no. 17658. Internet file: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17658/1/MPRA_paper_17658.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2010
- Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Ketels C-, Lindqvist G, Orjan S (2006) Cluster initiatives in developing and transition countries. Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Kim W-B (2003) The evolution of regional income disparities in Korea. Korea J 43(2(summer)):55–80Google Scholar
- Korea Times (2009) W126 Tril. Set for regional development, 17 Sep 2009, p 10Google Scholar
- Maincent E, Navarro L (2006) A policy for industrial champions: from picking winners to fostering excellence and the growth of firms. Industrial Policy and Economic Reforms Papers No. 2, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General, European Commission. Internet file: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/competitiveness. Accessed 1 Sep 2009
- OCED (2006) OCED territorial reviews: Seoul, Korea. OCED policy brief, April 2006Google Scholar
- Rodrik D (2004) Industrial policy for the 21st century. Internet file: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/unidosep.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2009
- Seliger B (2004) Südkorea als wirtschaftliche Drehscheibe Ostasiens? Kritische Anmerkungen zu einem aktuellen Konzept (South Korea as the hub of East Asia? Critical remarks on an actual concept). In: Patrick K (ed) Korea 2004 – Politik, Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft. Institut für Asienkunde, Hamburg, pp 67–89Google Scholar
- Sölvell Ö, Lindqvist G, Ketels C (2003) The cluster initiative greenbook. Ivory Tower, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Staber U (2009) Collective learning in clusters: mechanisms and biases. Entrep Reg Dev 21(5–6):553–573Google Scholar