Governing Public Service Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda

  • Andrea Calabrò
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


Critical issues and problem areas in governing public service organizations are increasingly discussed and the challenge is to develop good governance systems. However, the concept of governance is monopolizing the debate on Public Administration and Management. As a result, there are often overlaps, misuse and superficiality. The aim of this systematic literature review is to assess the state of the art on public service organizations governance structures and mechanisms analysing past, present and future evolutions. The arguments advanced in Osborne’s article (2006) that Public Administration and Management has actually passed through three dominant modes (Public Administration, New Public Management, and New Public Governance) are used. Drawing on this classification, 184 published (from 1970 to 2009) journal articles are quantitatively analysed. The results show significant associations between theories, research settings, sources of data, countries of analysis, and different governance regimes. Thus, moving from what has already been done, we identify critical areas that need further attention and insightful introspection.


Public Service Systematic Literature Review Public Management Network Governance Governance Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexander, J., & Nank, R. (2009). Public-nonprofit partnership realizing the new public service. Administration and Society, 41(3), 364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, O. J. (2004). Public-private partnerships: Organizational hybrids as channels for local mobilization and participation? Scandinavian Political Studies, 27(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, P. (1997). Performance standards and evaluation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(3), 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2010). Partial privatisation in local services delivery: An empirical analysis of the choice of mixed firms. Local Government Studies, 36(1), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benington, J. (2000). The modernization and improvement of government and public services. Public Money and Management, 20(2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boaz, A., Hayden, C., & Bernard, M. (1999). Attitudes and aspirations of older people: Reviews of the literature. Social security report no 101. Leeds: Department of Social Security.Google Scholar
  9. Bognetti, G., & Robotti, L. (2007). The provision of local public services through mixed enterprises: The Italian case. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 78(3), 415–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourgon, J. (2008). The future of public service: A search for a new balance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowman, J. S., Berman, E. M., & West, J. P. (2001). The profession of public administration: An ethics edge in introductory textbooks? Public Administration Review, 61(2), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyne, G., & Walker, R. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bozeman, B. (2009). Public values theory: Three big questions. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5), 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cafferata, R. (1995). Italian state-owned holdings, privatization and the single market. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 66(4), 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cafferata, R. (2008). L’ impresa pubblica nell’Unione europea. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
  21. Chapman, J., & Duncan, G. (2007). Is there now a new “New Zealand model”? Public Management Review, 9(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Checchi, D., Florio, M., & Carrera, J. (2009). Privatisation discontent and utility reform in Latin America. Journal of Development Studies, 45(3), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chew, C., & Osborne, S. P. (2009). Exploring strategic positioning in the UK charitable sector: Emerging evidence from charitable organizations that provide public services. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Christensen, T. (2003). Narratives of Norwegian governance: Elaborating the strong state tradition. Public Administration, 81(1), 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clarke, J., & Glendinning, C. (2002). Partnerships and the remaking of welfare governance. In C. Glendinning, M. Powell, & K. Rummery (Eds.), Partnerships, new labour and the governance of welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Collin, S. O., & Vagnoni, E. (2002). The governance of voluntary work in the public sector: Institutional differences and invariant traits. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(4), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Considine, M. (2002). The end of the line? Accountable governance in the age of networks, partnerships, and joined-up services. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
  30. Considine, M. (2003). Governance and competition: The role of non-profit organisations in the delivery of public services. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Cox, H. (2008). Public enterprises and service providers in institutional competition and undergoing structural change: New challenges to the theory of public economics and public services in Germany. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(3–4), 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. D’Aveni, R. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1994). Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(49), 643–657.Google Scholar
  35. David, R. J., & Han, S. K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (2000). What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money and Management, 19(1), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DeLeon, L., & Denhardt, R. (2000). The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dewey, M. E. (1983). Coefficients of agreement. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 143(1), 487–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Esmark, A. (2009). The functional differentiation of governance: Public governance beyond hierarchy, market and networks. Public Administration, 87(2), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Farrell, C. M. (2009). Governance, consumers and citizens: Agency and resistance in contemporary politics. Public Administration, 87(4), 986–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ferlie, E., Hartley, J., & Martin, S. (2003). Changing public service organizations: Current perspectives and future prospects. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fischbacher, M., & Beaumont, P. B. (2003). PFI, public-private partnerships and the neglected importance of process: Stakeholders and the employment dimension. Public Money and Management, 23(3), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gerxhani, K. (2003). The informal sector in developed and less developed countries: A literature survey. Public Choice, 120(3–4), 267–300.Google Scholar
  45. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gregory, R., & Hicks, C. (1999). Promoting public service integrity: A case for responsible accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58(4), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grossi, G., & Mussari, R. (2009). The effects of corporatisation on financial reporting: The experience of the Italian local governments. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(3–4), 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grout, P. A., & Stevens, M. (2003). The assessment: Financing and managing public services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.Google Scholar
  51. Hartley, J., Donaldson, C., Skelcher, C., & Wallace, M. (2008). Managing to improve public services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hodges, R., Wright, M., & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate governance in the public services: Concepts and issues. Public Money and Management, 16(2), 7–13.Google Scholar
  54. Hood, C. (1997). Which contract State? Four perspectives on over-outsourcing for public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(3), 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hood, J., & McGarvey, N. (2002). Managing the risks of public-private partnerships in Scottish local government. Policy Studies, 23(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hood, C., Dixon, R., & Beeston, C. (2008). Rating the rankings: Assessing international rankings of public service performance. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 298–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hudson, J., & Lowe, S. (2004). Understanding the policy process: Analysing welfare policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M., & Wistow, G. (1999). In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in the public sector: What is the contribution of theory and research? Public Management, 1(2), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Hysing, E. (2009). Governing without government? The private governance of forest certification in Sweden. Public Administration, 87(2), 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Joassart-Marcelli, P., & Musso, J. (2005). Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 492–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jorgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kakabadse, A., Korac-Kakabadse, N., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Ethics, values and paradox: Comparison of three case studies examining the paucity of leadership in government. Public Administration, 81(3), 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kelly, J. (2007). Reforming public services in the UK: Bringing in the third sector. Public Administration, 85(4), 1003–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kickert, W. J. M. (1997). Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to Anglo-American “managerialism”. Public Administration, 75(4), 731–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kickert, W. J. M. (2003). Beneath consensual corporatism: Traditions of governance in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 81(1), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kinchin, N. (2007). More than writing on a wall: Evaluating the role that codes of ethics play in securing accountability of public sector decision-makers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 504–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2000). Politicians and interactive decision making: Institutional spoilsports or playmakers. Public Administration, 78(2), 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Klijn, E. H., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money and Management, 23(3), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Klijn, E. H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kooiman, J. (1996). Research and theory about new public services management: Review and agenda for the future. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5–6), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kooiman, J. (1999). Socio-political governance: Overview, reflections and design. Public Management, 1(1), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  78. Lane, J. (2000). New public management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Lane, J. (2005). Public administration and public management the principal-agent perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Lonti, Z., & Gregory, R. (2007). Accountability or countability? Performance measurement in the New Zealand public service, 1992-2002. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lourdes, T., & Vicente, P. (2003). Changes in public service delivery in the EU countries. Public Money and Management, 22(4), 41–48.Google Scholar
  83. Lundqvist, L. J. (2001). Implementing from above: The ecology of power in Sweden’s environmental governance. Governance, 14(3), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Meier, H. E. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Moore, A., Nolan, J., & Segal, G. F. (2005). Putting out the trash: Measuring municipal service efficiency in U.S. cities. Urban Affairs Review, 41(2), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mulgan, R. (2006). Government accountability for outsourced services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. O’Toole, L. J. (1996). Rational choice and the public management of inter-organizational networks. In F. K. Donald & H. B. Milvard (Eds.), The state of public management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  91. O’Toole, L. J., Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Managing upward, downward and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Osborne, S. P. (1998). The innovative capacity of voluntary organisations: Managerial challenges for local government. Local Government Studies, 24(1), 19–40.Google Scholar
  93. Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Osborne, S. P. (2009). Debate: Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
  95. Osborne, S. P., & Kaposvari, A. (1998). Non-governmental organizations and the development of social services. Meeting social needs in local communities in post-communist Hungary. Public Administration and Development, 18(4), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Osborne, S. P., & McLaughlin, K. (2004). The cross-cutting review of the voluntary sector: Where next for local government voluntary sector relationships? Regional Studies, 38(5), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Osborne, S. P., Chew, C., & McLaughlin, K. (2008). The once and future pioneers? The innovative capacity of voluntary organisations and the provision of public services: A longitudinal approach. Public Management Review, 10(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Osborne, S. P., Jenei, G., Fabian, G., & Kuti, E. (2005). Government/non-profit partnerships, public services delivery, and civil society in the transitional nations of Eastern Europe: Lessons from the Hungarian experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 767–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Painter, M., & Mok, K. H. (2008). Reasserting the public in public service delivery: The de-privatization and de-marketization of education in China. Policy and Society, 27(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Perry, J. L. (2007). Democracy and the new public service. American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pestoff, V. (2008). A democratic architecture for the welfare state. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pettigrew, A. (2005). The character and significance of management research on the public services. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pierre, J. (2009). Reinventing governance, reinventing democracy? Policy and Politics, 37(4), 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5–6(3–4), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pollitt, C. (2009). Structural change and public service performance: International lessons? Public Money and Management, 29(5), 285–291.Google Scholar
  108. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  110. Poulsen, B. (2009). Competing traditions of governance and dilemmas of administrative accountability: The case of Denmark. Public Administration, 87(1), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 17(3), 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ranade, W., & Hudson, B. (2003). Conceptual issues in inter-agency collaboration. Local Government Studies, 29(3), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Reichard, C. (2006). Strengthening competitiveness of local public service providers in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(4), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2002). Putting people back into networks. Australian Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., & Lutz, K. (2006). A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications, 22(1), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Robinson, M. (2007). Does decentralisation improve equity and efficiency in public service delivery provision? Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies, 38(1), 7–17.Google Scholar
  120. Ruter, R. X., Sahr, K., & Waldersee, G. G. (2005). Public corporate governance. Ein Kodex für öffentliche Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  121. Skelcher, C. (2007). Does democracy matter? A transatlantic research design on democratic performance and special purpose governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Skelcher, C. (2010). Fishing in muddy waters: Principals, agents, and democratic governance in Europe. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2004). Effective partnership and good governance: Lessons for policy and practice. Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies.Google Scholar
  124. Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83(2), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Snape, S., & Taylor, P. (2004). Partnerships between health and local government. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  126. Sorensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(4), 693–720.Google Scholar
  127. Sorensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 98–114.Google Scholar
  128. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  129. Stone, M. M., & Sandfort, J. R. (2009). Building a policy fields framework to inform research on nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(6), 1054–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchel, J. (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  131. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Treib, O., Baehr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: A note towards conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public-private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wilkinson, M., & Craig, G. (2002). New roles for old: Local authority members and partnership working. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  136. Woods, N. D. (2009). Promoting participation? An examination of rulemaking notification and access procedures. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 518–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Yang, K., Hsieh, J. Y., & Li, T. S. (2009). Contracting capacity and perceived contracting performance: Nonlinear effects and the role of time. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 681–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Yapp, C., & Skelcher, C. (2007). Improvement boards: Building capability for public service improvement through peer support. Public Money and Management, 27(4), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business StudiesUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations